These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1141834)

  • 1. The role of orthographic and phonotactic rules in perceiving letter patterns.
    Spoehr KT; Smith EE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1975 Feb; 104(1):21-34. PubMed ID: 1141834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Orthographic regularity, positional frequency, and visual processing of letter strings.
    Massaro DW; Venezky RL; Taylor GA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1979 Mar; 108(1):107-24. PubMed ID: 528895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence from mutual masking for serial processing of tachistoscopic letter patterns.
    Nice DS; Harcum ER
    Percept Mot Skills; 1976 Jun; 42(3):991-1003. PubMed ID: 1272746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Phonological recoding and orthographic learning: A direct test of the self-teaching hypothesis.
    Share DL
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1999 Feb; 72(2):95-129. PubMed ID: 9927525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. From orthography to phonetics: ERP measures of grapheme-to-phoneme conversion mechanisms in reading.
    Proverbio AM; Vecchi L; Zani A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Mar; 16(2):301-17. PubMed ID: 15068599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cortical effects of shifting letter position in letter strings of varying length.
    Cornelissen P; Tarkiainen A; Helenius P; Salmelin R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Jul; 15(5):731-46. PubMed ID: 12965046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A cohort model of visual word recognition.
    Johnson NF; Pugh KR
    Cogn Psychol; 1994 Jun; 26(3):240-346. PubMed ID: 8033536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contrasting five different theories of letter position coding: evidence from orthographic similarity effects.
    Davis CJ; Bowers JS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Jun; 32(3):535-57. PubMed ID: 16822123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Homophone interference effects in visual word recognition.
    Ferrand L; Grainger J
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Apr; 56(3):403-19. PubMed ID: 12745841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A perceptual-economy account for the inverted-optimal viewing position effect.
    Vitu F; Lancelin D; Marrier d'Unienville V
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Oct; 33(5):1220-49. PubMed ID: 17924819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Two types of information in picture memory.
    Loftus GR; Bell SM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1975 Mar; 104(2):103-13. PubMed ID: 1141824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does letter position coding depend on consonant/vowel status? Evidence with the masked priming technique.
    Perea M; Acha J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Feb; 130(2):127-37. PubMed ID: 19081083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modelling relations between sensory processing, speech perception, orthographic and phonological ability, and literacy achievement.
    Boets B; Wouters J; van Wieringen A; De Smedt B; Ghesquière P
    Brain Lang; 2008 Jul; 106(1):29-40. PubMed ID: 18207564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How does interhemispheric communication in visual word recognition work? Deciding between early and late integration accounts of the split fovea theory.
    Van der Haegen L; Brysbaert M; Davis CJ
    Brain Lang; 2009 Feb; 108(2):112-21. PubMed ID: 18657313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Syllabic priming in lexical decision and naming tasks: the syllable congruency effect re-examined in French.
    Chetail F; Mathey S
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Mar; 63(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 19271815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preliminary letter identification in the perception of words and nonwords.
    McClelland JL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1976 Feb; 2(1):80-91. PubMed ID: 1262797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A model for multitalker speech perception.
    Srinivasan S; Wang D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Nov; 124(5):3213-24. PubMed ID: 19045805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual identity and uncertainty in repetition blindness.
    Brill GA; Glass AL; Rashid H; Hussey E
    Am J Psychol; 2008; 121(3):409-49. PubMed ID: 18792718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sublexical and lexical representations in speech production: effects of phonotactic probability and onset density.
    Vitevitch MS; Armbruster J; Chu S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Mar; 30(2):514-29. PubMed ID: 14979821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sensorimotor adaptation to feedback perturbations of vowel acoustics and its relation to perception.
    Villacorta VM; Perkell JS; Guenther FH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2306-19. PubMed ID: 17902866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.