These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11419624)

  • 21. Signal-to-noise ratio and spatial resolution in x-ray electronic imagers: is the MTF a relevant parameter?
    Moy JP
    Med Phys; 2000 Jan; 27(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 10659741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Early experience in the use of quantitative image quality measurements for the quality assurance of full field digital mammography x-ray systems.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Sep; 52(18):5545-68. PubMed ID: 17804881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. X-ray imaging using avalanche multiplication in amorphous selenium: investigation of depth dependent avalanche noise.
    Hunt DC; Tanioka K; Rowlands JA
    Med Phys; 2007 Mar; 34(3):976-86. PubMed ID: 17441244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Detective quantum efficiency of intensified CMOS cameras for Cherenkov imaging in radiotherapy.
    Alexander DA; Bruza P; Farwell JCM; Krishnaswamy V; Zhang R; Gladstone DJ; Pogue BW
    Phys Med Biol; 2020 Nov; 65(22):225013. PubMed ID: 33179612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A comparison of the performance of digital mammography systems.
    Monnin P; Gutierrez D; Bulling S; Guntern D; Verdun FR
    Med Phys; 2007 Mar; 34(3):906-14. PubMed ID: 17441236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comprehensive model for x-ray projection imaging system efficiency and image quality characterization in the presence of scattered radiation.
    Monnin P; Verdun FR; Bosmans H; Pérez SR; Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jun; 62(14):5691-5722. PubMed ID: 28557801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Perception of detail and greyscale range in X-ray fluoroscopy images captured with a personal computer and frame-grabber.
    Okkalides D
    Eur J Radiol; 1996 Sep; 23(2):149-58. PubMed ID: 8886729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Noise aliasing in interline-video-based fluoroscopy systems.
    Lai H; Cunningham A
    Med Phys; 2002 Mar; 29(3):298-310. PubMed ID: 11929012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A moving slanted-edge method to measure the temporal modulation transfer function of fluoroscopic systems.
    Friedman SN; Cunningham IA
    Med Phys; 2008 Jun; 35(6):2473-84. PubMed ID: 18649480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Characterization of a mammographic system based on single photon counting pixel arrays coupled to GaAs x-ray detectors.
    Amendolia SR; Bisogni MG; Delogu P; Fantacci ME; Paternoster G; Rosso V; Stefanini A
    Med Phys; 2009 Apr; 36(4):1330-9. PubMed ID: 19472640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. System considerations in CCD-based x-ray imaging for digital chest radiography and digital mammography.
    Hejazi S; Trauernicht DP
    Med Phys; 1997 Feb; 24(2):287-97. PubMed ID: 9048370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Image quality evaluation of flat panel and image intensifier digital magnification in x-ray fluoroscopy.
    Srinivas Y; Wilson DL
    Med Phys; 2002 Jul; 29(7):1611-21. PubMed ID: 12148744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Experimental and theoretical x-ray imaging performance comparison of iodine and lanthanide contrast agents.
    Cardinal HN; Holdsworth DW; Drangova M; Hobbs BB; Fenster A
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(1):15-31. PubMed ID: 8455493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Threshold contrast detail detectability curves for fluoroscopy and digital acquisition using modern image intensifier systems.
    Evans DS; Mackenzie A; Lawinski CP; Smith D
    Br J Radiol; 2004 Sep; 77(921):751-8. PubMed ID: 15447961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Empirical and theoretical investigation of the noise performance of indirect detection, active matrix flat-panel imagers (AMFPIs) for diagnostic radiology.
    Siewerdsen JH; Antonuk LE; el-Mohri Y; Yorkston J; Huang W; Boudry JM; Cunningham IA
    Med Phys; 1997 Jan; 24(1):71-89. PubMed ID: 9029542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Signal detectability in digital radiography: spatial domain figures of merit.
    Gagne RM; Boswell JS; Myers KJ
    Med Phys; 2003 Aug; 30(8):2180-93. PubMed ID: 12945984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Solid-state fluoroscopic imager for high-resolution angiography: physical characteristics of an 8 cm x 8 cm experimental prototype.
    Vedantham S; Karellas A; Suryanarayanan S; Onishi SK
    Med Phys; 2004 Jun; 31(6):1462-72. PubMed ID: 15259649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A novel method to assess the spatiotemporal image quality in fluoroscopy.
    Monnin P; Viry A; Damet J; Nowak M; Vitzthum V; Racine D
    Phys Med Biol; 2021 Dec; 66(24):. PubMed ID: 34808602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The contrast-detail behaviour of a photostimulable phosphor based computed radiography system.
    Marshall NW; Faulkner K; Busch HP; Lehmann KJ
    Phys Med Biol; 1994 Dec; 39(12):2289-303. PubMed ID: 15551554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Characterisation of the signal and noise transfer of CCD cameras for electron detection.
    Meyer RR; Kirkland AI
    Microsc Res Tech; 2000 May; 49(3):269-80. PubMed ID: 10816267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.