These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11419624)

  • 41. Physical imaging performance of a compact computed radiography acquisition device.
    Kengyelics SM; Launders JH; Cowen AR
    Med Phys; 1998 Mar; 25(3):354-60. PubMed ID: 9547503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Detective quantum efficiency of an amorphous selenium detector to megavoltage radiation.
    Mah D; Rawlinson JA; Rowlands JA
    Phys Med Biol; 1999 May; 44(5):1369-84. PubMed ID: 10368025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Physical performance measures of radiographic imaging systems.
    Workman A; Brettle DS
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 May; 26(3):139-46. PubMed ID: 9442599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Assessment of performance of a new digital image intensifier fluoroscopy system.
    Dimov A; Vassileva J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):123-6. PubMed ID: 18469348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Detection improvement in spatially filtered x-ray fluoroscopy image sequences.
    Jabri KN; Wilson DL
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 1999 Mar; 16(3):742-9. PubMed ID: 10069059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Experimental comparison of noise and resolution for 2k and 4k storage phosphor radiography systems.
    Flynn MJ; Samei E
    Med Phys; 1999 Aug; 26(8):1612-23. PubMed ID: 10501062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A comparison of mono- and poly-energetic x-ray beam performance for radiographic and fluoroscopic imaging.
    Boone JM; Seibert JA
    Med Phys; 1994 Dec; 21(12):1853-63. PubMed ID: 7700192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Determination of the detective quantum efficiency of a prototype, megavoltage indirect detection, active matrix flat-panel imager.
    El-Mohri Y; Jee KW; Antonuk LE; Maolinbay M; Zhao Q
    Med Phys; 2001 Dec; 28(12):2538-50. PubMed ID: 11797959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Electronic scanning-slit fluorography.
    Plenkovich D
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1989; 373():1-48. PubMed ID: 2488063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Dynamic flat panel detector versus image intensifier in cardiac imaging: dose and image quality.
    Vano E; Geiger B; Schreiner A; Back C; Beissel J
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Dec; 50(23):5731-42. PubMed ID: 16306664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The design and imaging characteristics of dynamic, solid-state, flat-panel x-ray image detectors for digital fluoroscopy and fluorography.
    Cowen AR; Davies AG; Sivananthan MU
    Clin Radiol; 2008 Oct; 63(10):1073-85. PubMed ID: 18774353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Image quality evaluation of a desktop computed radiography system.
    Fetterly KA; Hangiandreou NJ
    Med Phys; 2000 Dec; 27(12):2669-79. PubMed ID: 11190949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Parallel cascades: new ways to describe noise transfer in medical imaging systems.
    Yao J; Cunningham IA
    Med Phys; 2001 Oct; 28(10):2020-38. PubMed ID: 11695765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A small-signal approach to temporal modulation transfer functions with exposure-rate dependence and its application to fluoroscopic detective quantum efficiency.
    Friedman SN; Cunningham IA
    Med Phys; 2009 Aug; 36(8):3775-85. PubMed ID: 19746811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Image quality assessment in digital mammography: part I. Technical characterization of the systems.
    Marshall NW; Monnin P; Bosmans H; Bochud FO; Verdun FR
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Jul; 56(14):4201-20. PubMed ID: 21701051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Performance of a static-anode/flat-panel x-ray fluoroscopy system in a diagnostic strength magnetic field: a truly hybrid x-ray/MR imaging system.
    Fahrig R; Wen Z; Ganguly A; DeCrescenzo G; Rowlands JA; Stevens GM; Saunders RF; Pelc NJ
    Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1775-84. PubMed ID: 16013735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Digital x-ray imaging using amorphous selenium: reduction of aliasing.
    Ji WG; Zhao W; Rowlands JA
    Med Phys; 1998 Nov; 25(11):2148-62. PubMed ID: 9829239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. NPWE model observer as a validated alternative for contrast detail analysis of digital detectors in general radiography.
    Van Peteghem N; Bosmans H; Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 Nov; 61(21):N575-N591. PubMed ID: 27754987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Characterization of the effects of the FineView algorithm for full field digital mammography.
    Urbanczyk H; McDonagh E; Marshall NW; Castellano I
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Apr; 57(7):1987-2003. PubMed ID: 22429938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.