156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11419628)
1. Intensity modulated irradiation of a thorax phantom: comparisons between measurements, Monte Carlo calculations and pencil beam calculations.
Laub WU; Bakai A; Nüsslin F
Phys Med Biol; 2001 Jun; 46(6):1695-706. PubMed ID: 11419628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dose verification of an IMRT treatment planning system with the BEAM EGS4-based Monte Carlo code.
Francescon P; Cora S; Chiovati P
Med Phys; 2003 Feb; 30(2):144-57. PubMed ID: 12607832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Monte Carlo verification of IMRT dose distributions from a commercial treatment planning optimization system.
Ma CM; Pawlicki T; Jiang SB; Li JS; Deng J; Mok E; Kapur A; Xing L; Ma L; Boyer AL
Phys Med Biol; 2000 Sep; 45(9):2483-95. PubMed ID: 11008950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Underdosage of the upper-airway mucosa for small fields as used in intensity-modulated radiation therapy: a comparison between radiochromic film measurements, Monte Carlo simulations, and collapsed cone convolution calculations.
Martens C; Reynaert N; De Wagter C; Nilsson P; Coghe M; Palmans H; Thierens H; De Neve W
Med Phys; 2002 Jul; 29(7):1528-35. PubMed ID: 12148735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Monte carlo dose calculations in conventional thorax fields for 60Co photons.
Mesbahi A; Allahverdi M; Gheraati H
Radiat Med; 2005 Aug; 23(5):341-50. PubMed ID: 16342907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of patient dose calculation for lung IMRT: A comparison of Monte Carlo, convolution/superposition, and pencil beam computations.
Vanderstraeten B; Reynaert N; Paelinck L; Madani I; De Wagter C; De Gersem W; De Neve W; Thierens H
Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3149-58. PubMed ID: 17022207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Monte Carlo dose calculations in the treatment of a pelvis with implant and comparison with pencil-beam calculations.
Laub WU; Nüsslin F
Med Dosim; 2003; 28(4):229-33. PubMed ID: 14684187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Verification measurements and clinical evaluation of the iPlan RT Monte Carlo dose algorithm for 6 MV photon energy.
Petoukhova AL; van Wingerden K; Wiggenraad RG; van de Vaart PJ; van Egmond J; Franken EM; van Santvoort JP
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4601-14. PubMed ID: 20668337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of an electron Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm for treatment planning.
Chamberland E; Beaulieu L; Lachance B
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 May; 16(3):4636. PubMed ID: 26103470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Two-dimensional pencil beam scaling: an improved proton dose algorithm for heterogeneous media.
Szymanowski H; Oelfke U
Phys Med Biol; 2002 Sep; 47(18):3313-30. PubMed ID: 12375823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Monte Carlo evaluation of tissue inhomogeneity effects in the treatment of the head and neck.
Wang L; Yorke E; Chui CS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Aug; 50(5):1339-49. PubMed ID: 11483347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dose calculation accuracy of lung planning with a commercial IMRT treatment planning system.
McDermott PN; He T; DeYoung A
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2003; 4(4):341-51. PubMed ID: 14604424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inclusion of compensator-induced scatter and beam filtration in pencil beam dose calculations.
du Plessis FC; Willemse CA
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2896-904. PubMed ID: 16964866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Monte Carlo dose computation for IMRT optimization.
Laub W; Alber M; Birkner M; Nüsslin F
Phys Med Biol; 2000 Jul; 45(7):1741-54. PubMed ID: 10943916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Algorithms used in heterogeneous dose calculations show systematic differences as measured with the Radiological Physics Center's anthropomorphic thorax phantom used for RTOG credentialing.
Kry SF; Alvarez P; Molineu A; Amador C; Galvin J; Followill DS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Jan; 85(1):e95-100. PubMed ID: 23237006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. IMRT head and neck treatment planning with a commercially available Monte Carlo based planning system.
Boudreau C; Heath E; Seuntjens J; Ballivy O; Parker W
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):879-90. PubMed ID: 15798262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Monte Carlo simulation and dosimetric verification of radiotherapy beam modifiers.
Spezi E; Lewis DG; Smith CW
Phys Med Biol; 2001 Nov; 46(11):3007-29. PubMed ID: 11720360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.
Panettieri V; Barsoum P; Westermark M; Brualla L; Lax I
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of electron beam dose calculation accuracy between treatment planning systems using either a pencil beam or a Monte Carlo algorithm.
Ding GX; Cygler JE; Yu CW; Kalach NI; Daskalov G
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):622-33. PubMed ID: 16168854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Head-and-neck IMRT treatments assessed with a Monte Carlo dose calculation engine.
Seco J; Adams E; Bidmead M; Partridge M; Verhaegen F
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):817-30. PubMed ID: 15798257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
