These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11420019)

  • 1. Facial attractiveness and facial impairment ratings in children with craniofacial malformations.
    Okkerse JM; Beemer FA; Cordia-de Haan M; Heineman-de Boer JA; Mellenbergh GJ; Wolters WH
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2001 Jul; 38(4):386-92. PubMed ID: 11420019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Objective assessment of the contribution of dental esthetics and facial attractiveness in men via eye tracking.
    Baker RS; Fields HW; Beck FM; Firestone AR; Rosenstiel SF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Apr; 153(4):523-533. PubMed ID: 29602344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Software-based evaluation of human attractiveness: a pilot study.
    Patzelt SB; Schaible LK; Stampf S; Kohal RJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1176-81. PubMed ID: 25218031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Combined effects of severity of cleft impairment and facial attractiveness on social perception: an experimental study.
    Tobiasen JM; Hiebert JM
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1993 Jan; 30(1):82-6. PubMed ID: 8418877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Smile esthetics from patients' perspectives for faces of varying attractiveness.
    Chang CA; Fields HW; Beck FM; Springer NC; Firestone AR; Rosenstiel S; Christensen JC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):e171-80. PubMed ID: 21967955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of dental and background facial attractiveness on facial attractiveness and perceived integrity and social and intellectual qualities.
    Papio MA; Fields HW; Beck FM; Firestone AR; Rosenstiel SF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Oct; 156(4):464-474.e1. PubMed ID: 31582118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The virtual focus group: a modern methodology for facial attractiveness rating.
    Popenko NA; Devcic Z; Karimi K; Wong BJF
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2012 Sep; 130(3):455e-461e. PubMed ID: 22929271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of dentofacial appearance on the social attractiveness of young adults.
    Shaw WC; Rees G; Dawe M; Charles CR
    Am J Orthod; 1985 Jan; 87(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 3855347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of providers' and consumers' perceptions of facial-profile attractiveness.
    Maple JR; Vig KW; Beck FM; Larsen PE; Shanker S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):690-6; quiz 801. PubMed ID: 16360907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability of esthetic ratings of cleft impairment.
    Tobiasen JM; Hiebert JM
    Cleft Palate J; 1988 Jul; 25(3):313-7. PubMed ID: 3168276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Judgments of facial attractiveness as a combination of facial parts information over time: Social and aesthetic factors.
    Saegusa C; Watanabe K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Feb; 42(2):173-9. PubMed ID: 26460871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of scales of severity of facial cleft impairment.
    Tobiasen JM; Hiebert JM; Boraz RA
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1991 Oct; 28(4):419-24. PubMed ID: 1742313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computational models of facial attractiveness judgments.
    Bronstad PM; Langlois JH; Russell R
    Perception; 2008; 37(1):126-42. PubMed ID: 18399252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The validity and reliability of ratings of dental and facial attractiveness for epidemiologic use.
    Howells DJ; Shaw WC
    Am J Orthod; 1985 Nov; 88(5):402-8. PubMed ID: 3864374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The ranking of facial attractiveness.
    Roberts-Harry DP; Hathorn IS; Stephens CD
    Eur J Orthod; 1992 Dec; 14(6):483-8. PubMed ID: 1486934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of Objective 3-Dimensional Measures of Facial Shape and Symmetry on Perceptions of Facial Attractiveness.
    Hatch CD; Wehby GL; Nidey NL; Moreno Uribe LM
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Sep; 75(9):1958-1970. PubMed ID: 28577372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sex differences in judgments of physical attractiveness: a social relations analysis.
    Marcus DK; Miller RS
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2003 Mar; 29(3):325-35. PubMed ID: 15273010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Facial appearance and attachment in infants with orofacial clefts: a replication.
    Coy K; Speltz ML; Jones K
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2002 Jan; 39(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 11772172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Maxillary arch width and buccal corridor changes with orthodontic treatment. Part 2: attractiveness of the frontal facial smile in extraction and nonextraction outcomes.
    Meyer AH; Woods MG; Manton DJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Mar; 145(3):296-304. PubMed ID: 24582021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An objective system for measuring facial attractiveness.
    Bashour M
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 Sep; 118(3):757-74; discussion 775-6. PubMed ID: 16932187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.