These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11420624)

  • 1. A comparison of diagnostic accuracy of a newly developed photofluorographic panoramic system with conventional panoramic radiography.
    Nagata Y
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 May; 30(3):137-40. PubMed ID: 11420624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Panoramic radiography in dental diagnostics.
    Molander B
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1996; 119():1-26. PubMed ID: 8971997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of bitewing, periapical, unfiltered and filtered digital panoramic images for approximal caries detection in posterior teeth.
    Akarslan ZZ; Akdevelioğlu M; Güngör K; Erten H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Dec; 37(8):458-63. PubMed ID: 19033431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A novel panoramic machine for photofluorography.
    Ohba T; Nagata Y; Morimoto Y; Tanaka T; Nakamura T; Katayama H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Jan; 28(1):48-51. PubMed ID: 10202479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of a new digital panoramic system: a comparison with film.
    Ramesh A; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Mar; 30(2):98-100. PubMed ID: 11313729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic accuracy of direct digital dental radiography for the detection of periapical bone lesions: overall comparison between conventional and direct digital radiography.
    Kullendorff B; Nilsson M; Rohlin M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Sep; 82(3):344-50. PubMed ID: 8884837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison between Scanora panoramic radiography and bitewing radiography in the assessment of marginal bone tissue.
    Ivanauskaite D; Lindh C; Rangne K; Rohlin M
    Stomatologija; 2006; 8(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 16687909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A clinical evaluation of some factors affecting image quality in panoramic radiography.
    Kaeppler G; Axmann-Krcmar D; Reuter I; Meyle J; Gómez-Román G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Mar; 29(2):81-4. PubMed ID: 10808220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Observer performance in the assessment of periapical pathology: a comparison of panoramic with periapical radiography.
    Rohlin M; Kullendorff B; Ahlqwist M; Stenström B
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 Aug; 20(3):127-31. PubMed ID: 1807995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostic accuracy of in vitro panoramic radiographs depending on the exposure.
    Kaeppler G; Dietz K; Reinert S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Feb; 36(2):68-74. PubMed ID: 17403882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detailed tomography of periapical and periodontal lesions. Diagnostic accuracy compared with periapical radiography.
    Tammisalo T; Luostarinen T; Vähätalo K; Neva M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Apr; 25(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 9446979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of dose reduction on the detectability of standardized radiolucent lesions in digital panoramic radiography.
    Dula K; Sanderink G; van der Stelt PF; Mini R; Buser D
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Aug; 86(2):227-33. PubMed ID: 9720100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can dental students be taught to use dental radiographs for osteoporosis screening?
    Shintaku WH; Enciso R; Covington JS; Migliorati CA
    J Dent Educ; 2013 May; 77(5):598-603. PubMed ID: 23658405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of dose reduction on the detection of anatomical structures on panoramic radiographs.
    Kaeppler G; Dietz K; Reinert S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jul; 35(4):271-7. PubMed ID: 16798925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of the diagnostic utility of two image receptors for panoramic radiography.
    Carmichael FA; Hirschmann PN; Scaife B; Sheard L; Mackenzie A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 10654038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Observer performance based on marginal bone tissue visibility in Scanora panoramic radiography and posterior bitewing radiography.
    Ivanauskaite D; Lindh C; Rohlin M
    Stomatologija; 2008; 10(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 18493164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of a digital flat-panel versus screen-film, photofluorography and storage-phosphor systems by detection of simulated lung adenocarcinoma lesions using hard copy images.
    Ono K; Yoshitake T; Akahane K; Yamada Y; Maeda T; Kai M; Kusama T
    Br J Radiol; 2005 Oct; 78(934):922-7. PubMed ID: 16177015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparative diagnostic assessment of anterior tooth and bone status using panoramic and periapical radiography.
    Le T; Nassery K; Kahlert B; Heithersay G
    Aust Orthod J; 2011 Nov; 27(2):162-8. PubMed ID: 22372273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of panoramic radiography and panoramic digital subtraction radiography in the detection of simulated osteophytic lesions of the mandibular condyle.
    Masood F; Katz JO; Hardman PK; Glaros AG; Spencer P
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 May; 93(5):626-31. PubMed ID: 12075216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Panoramic radiography in the assessment of the marginal bone level.
    Akesson L
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1991; 78():1-129. PubMed ID: 1896925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.