113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11420907)
21. Ultrasound: assessment of the distraction osteogenesis wound in patients undergoing mandibular lengthening.
Troulis MJ; Coppe C; O'Neill MJ; Kaban LB
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Oct; 61(10):1144-9. PubMed ID: 14586848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Bilateral mandibular distraction in adult dogs with an epiperiosteal distractor.
Hasse AR; Pörksen M; Zimmermann CE
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Apr; 43(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 15749209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Callus formation enhanced by BMP-7 ex vivo gene therapy during distraction osteogenesis in rats.
Hu J; Qi MC; Zou SJ; Li JH; Luo E
J Orthop Res; 2007 Feb; 25(2):241-51. PubMed ID: 17089407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Mineralization and mechanical properties of the canine mandible distraction wound following acute molding.
Kunz C; Adolphs N; Büscher P; Hammer B; Rahn B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Sep; 35(9):822-7. PubMed ID: 16698236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Bone regeneration and docking site healing after bone transport distraction osteogenesis in the canine mandible.
Nagashima LK; Rondon-Newby M; Zakhary IE; Nagy WW; Zapata U; Dechow PC; Opperman LA; Elsalanty ME
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 70(2):429-39. PubMed ID: 21601342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. How does the rate of dentoalveolar distraction affect the bone regenerate produced?
Spencer AC; Campbell PM; Dechow P; Ellis ML; Buschang PH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):e211-21. PubMed ID: 22051499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Acceleration of callus maturation using rhOP-1 in mandibular distraction osteogenesis in a rat model.
Terheyden H; Wang H; Warnke PH; Springer I; Erxleben A; Ludwig K; Rueger DC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Oct; 32(5):528-33. PubMed ID: 14759113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effects of simvastatin on mandibular distraction osteogenesis.
Kiliç E; Ozeç I; Yeler H; Korkmaz A; Ayas B; Gümüş C
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Nov; 66(11):2233-8. PubMed ID: 18940485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The effect of ultrasound on osteogenesis in the vertically distracted edentulous mandible: a double-blind trial.
Schortinghuis J; Bronckers AL; Gravendeel J; Stegenga B; Raghoebar GM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Nov; 37(11):1014-21. PubMed ID: 18757179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Role of guided bone regeneration principle in preventing fibrous healing in distraction osteogenesis at high speed: experimental study in rabbit mandibles.
Elshahat A; Inoue N; Marti G; Safe I; Manson P; Vanderkolk C
J Craniofac Surg; 2004 Nov; 15(6):916-21. PubMed ID: 15547374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The effect of chitosan bead encapsulating calcium sulfate as an injectable bone substitute on consolidation in the mandibular distraction osteogenesis of a dog model.
Cho BC; Chung HY; Lee DG; Yang JD; Park JW; Roh KH; Kim GU; Lee DS; Kwon IC; Bae EH; Jang KH; Park RW; Kim IS
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Dec; 63(12):1753-64. PubMed ID: 16297697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis enhanced by bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in rats.
Qi M; Hu J; Zou S; Zhou H; Han L
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2006 Jul; 34(5):283-9. PubMed ID: 16777427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Osteodistraction of mandibles with a small bone defect at the planned osteotomy site: a histological pilot study in dogs.
Zandi M; Dehghan A; Saleh M; Seyed Hoseini SR
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):e204-9. PubMed ID: 24113296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effect of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 on mandibular distraction at different rates in a rabbit model.
Zheng LW; Cheung LK
Tissue Eng; 2006 Nov; 12(11):3181-8. PubMed ID: 17518632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Apoptosis in the regenerate produced by mandibular osteodistraction in the mature rat.
Liu ZJ; Anderson MW; Gu GM; King GJ
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2005 Feb; 8(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 15667644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Use of a new curvilinear distractor to repair mandibular defects in dogs.
Shang H; Lin X; Du J; He L; Liu Y
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Mar; 50(2):166-70. PubMed ID: 21470726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Nonvascular transport distraction osteogenesis in bone formation and regeneration. Is it an accidental phenomenon?
Guo P; Zeng JJ; Zhou N
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 43(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 25457741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of distracted mandibular bone using computed tomography scan and ultrasonography: technical note.
Selim H; Elbargothy N; Nabil Y; El-Hakim I
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Jul; 38(5):274-80. PubMed ID: 19474254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Local injection of nerve growth factor via a hydrogel enhances bone formation during mandibular distraction osteogenesis.
Cao J; Wang L; Lei DL; Liu YP; Du ZJ; Cui FZ
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Jan; 113(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 22677691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Experimental evaluation of acute molding of the regenerate in mandibular distraction osteogenesis in a rabbit model.
Candırlı C; Dolanmaz D; Etöz OA; Avunduk MC
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Nov; 110(5):554-9. PubMed ID: 20576452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
