These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Manipulating the behavior-altering effect of the motivating operation: examination of the influence on challenging behavior during leisure activities. O'Reilly MF; Sigafoos J; Lancioni G; Rispoli M; Lang R; Chan J; Machalicek W; Langthorne P Res Dev Disabil; 2008; 29(4):333-40. PubMed ID: 17629672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing preference assessments: selection- versus duration-based preference assessment procedures. Kodak T; Fisher WW; Kelley ME; Kisamore A Res Dev Disabil; 2009; 30(5):1068-77. PubMed ID: 19327964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of verbal and tangible stimulus preference assessments. Cohen-Almeida D; Graff RB; Ahearn WH J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(3):329-34. PubMed ID: 11051576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment. Roane HS; Vollmer TR; Ringdahl JE; Marcus BA J Appl Behav Anal; 1998; 31(4):605-20. PubMed ID: 9891397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Treatment efficacy of noncontingent reinforcement during brief and extended application. Lindberg JS; Iwata BA; Roscoe EM; Worsdell AS; Hanley GP J Appl Behav Anal; 2003; 36(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 12723863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A systematic evaluation of preferences identified through person-centered planning for people with profound multiple disabilities. Reid DH; Everson JM; Green CW J Appl Behav Anal; 1999; 32(4):467-77. PubMed ID: 10641301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating the predictive validity of a single stimulus engagement preference assessment. Hagopian LP; Rush KS; Lewin AB; Long ES J Appl Behav Anal; 2001; 34(4):475-85. PubMed ID: 11800186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validity and reliability of the Leisure Assessment Inventory. Hawkins BA; Ardovino P; Hsieh CM Ment Retard; 1998 Aug; 36(4):303-13. PubMed ID: 9713186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stability of preference and reinforcing efficacy of edible, leisure, and social attention stimuli. Butler C; Graff RB J Appl Behav Anal; 2021 Apr; 54(2):684-699. PubMed ID: 33469909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of verbal preference assessments in the presence and absence of the actual stimuli. Kuhn DE; DeLeon IG; Terlonge C; Goysovich R Res Dev Disabil; 2006; 27(6):645-56. PubMed ID: 16263239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]