These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11421319)

  • 1. Antecedent manipulations in a tangible condition: effects of stimulus preference on aggression.
    Mueller MM; Wilczynski SM; Moore JW; Fusilier I; Trahant D
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2001; 34(2):237-40. PubMed ID: 11421319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment and treatment of problem behavior maintained by escape from attention and access to tangible items.
    Hagopian LP; Wilson DM; Wilder DA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2001; 34(2):229-32. PubMed ID: 11421317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preference for unreliable reinforcement in children with mental retardation: the role of conditioned reinforcement.
    Lalli JS; Mauro BC; Mace FC
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(4):533-44. PubMed ID: 11214029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reinforcer choice as an antecedent versus consequence.
    Peterson C; Lerman DC; Nissen MA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2016 Jun; 49(2):286-93. PubMed ID: 26792252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Examination of an antecedent communication intervention to reduce tangibly maintained challenging behavior: a controlled analog analysis.
    O'Reilly M; Fragale C; Gainey S; Kang S; Koch H; Shubert J; Zein FE; Longino D; Chung M; Xu Z; White P; Lang R; Davis T; Rispoli M; Lancioni G; Didden R; Healy O; Kagohara D; van der Meer L; Sigafoos J
    Res Dev Disabil; 2012; 33(5):1462-8. PubMed ID: 22543058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reduction of aggression evoked by sounds using noncontingent reinforcement and time-out.
    Dupuis DL; Lerman DC; Tsami L; Shireman ML
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2015 Sep; 48(3):669-74. PubMed ID: 26118940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using pictures to assess reinforcers in individuals with developmental disabilities.
    Graff RB; Gibson L
    Behav Modif; 2003 Sep; 27(4):470-83. PubMed ID: 12971123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Obtained versus programmed reinforcement practical considerations in the treatment of escape-reinforced aggression.
    Johnson L; McComas J; Thompson A; Symons FJ
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2004; 37(2):239-42. PubMed ID: 15293645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of preference for varied versus constant reinforcers.
    Bowman LG; Piazza CC; Fisher WW; Hagopian LP; Kogan JS
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(3):451-8. PubMed ID: 9316258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An alternative method of thinning reinforcer delivery during differential reinforcement.
    Roane HS; Fisher WW; Sgro GM; Falcomata TS; Pabico RR
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2004; 37(2):213-8. PubMed ID: 15293640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of a brief multiple-stimulus preference assessment in a naturalistic context.
    Carr JE; Nicolson AC; Higbee TS
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(3):353-7. PubMed ID: 11051581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using videos to assess preference for novel stimuli in children with autism.
    Brodhead MT; Rispoli MJ
    Dev Neurorehabil; 2017 Nov; 20(8):560-564. PubMed ID: 27739912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of reinforcement choice on task responding in individuals with developmental disabilities.
    Lerman DC; Iwata BA; Rainville B; Adelinis JD; Crosland K; Kogan J
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(3):411-22. PubMed ID: 9316256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using a choice assessment to predict reinforcer effectiveness.
    Piazza CC; Fisher WW; Hagopian LP; Bowman LG; Toole L
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 8881340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reinforcement magnitude: an evaluation of preference and reinforcer efficacy.
    Trosclair-Lasserre NM; Lerman DC; Call NA; Addison LR; Kodak T
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2008; 41(2):203-20. PubMed ID: 18595284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of constant versus varied reinforcers on preference and resistance to change.
    Milo JS; Mace FC; Nevin JA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2010 May; 93(3):385-94. PubMed ID: 21119852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Putative behavioral history effects and aggression maintained by escape from therapists.
    Progar PR; North ST; Bruce SS; DiNovi BJ; Nau PA; Eberman EM; Bailey JR; Nussbaum CN
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2001; 34(1):69-72. PubMed ID: 11317990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Competing stimuli in the treatment of multiply controlled problem behavior during hygiene routines.
    Long ES; Hagopian LP; Deleon IG; Marhefka JM; Resau D
    Res Dev Disabil; 2005; 26(1):57-69. PubMed ID: 15590238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reinforcement of compliance with respiratory treatment in a child with cystic fibrosis.
    Hagopian LP; Thompson RH
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1999; 32(2):233-6. PubMed ID: 10396778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Including unfamiliar stimuli in preference assessments for young children with autism.
    Kenzer AL; Bishop MR; Wilke AE; Tarbox JR
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2013; 46(3):689-94. PubMed ID: 24114234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.