These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11422674)
1. The use of the transmandibular implant system in extreme atrophy of the mandible; a retrospective study of the results in two different hospital situations. Verhoeven JW; Cune MS; Van Kampen FM; Koole R J Oral Rehabil; 2001 Jun; 28(6):497-506. PubMed ID: 11422674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The transmandibular implant: a 5- and 15-year single-center study. Paton G; Fuss J; Goss AN J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Aug; 60(8):851-7. PubMed ID: 12149725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Case report: the transmandibular implant system. Tinsley D; Watson CJ; Russell JL; Hassall DC Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2001 Mar; 9(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 11695132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Implant-retained mandibular overdentures: 6-year results of a multicenter clinical trial on 3 different implant systems. Meijer HJ; Geertman ME; Raghoebar GM; Kwakman JM J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Nov; 59(11):1260-8; discussion 1269-70. PubMed ID: 11688021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The extremely resorbed mandible: a comparative prospective study of 2-year results with 3 treatment strategies. Stellingsma K; Raghoebar GM; Meijer HJ; Stegenga B Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(4):563-77. PubMed ID: 15346755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The extremely resorbed mandible, 10-year results of a randomized controlled trial on 3 treatment strategies. Stellingsma K; Raghoebar GM; Visser A; Vissink A; Meijer HJ Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Aug; 25(8):926-32. PubMed ID: 23638947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Functional and cosmetic reconstruction of the facial lower third associated with placement of the transmandibular implant system. Powers MP; Bosker H J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1996 Aug; 54(8):934-42. PubMed ID: 8765381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Management of a patient with a failed transmandibular implant. Bousdras VA; Aghabeigi B; Griffiths B Dent Update; 2006; 33(6):373-6. PubMed ID: 16922109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of ball and telescopic crown attachments in implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 5-year prospective study. Krennmair G; Seemann R; Weinländer M; Piehslinger E Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):598-606. PubMed ID: 21691608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reconstruction of the extremely atrophied mandible with iliac crest onlay grafts followed by two endosteal implants: a retrospective study with long-term follow-up. Boven GC; Meijer HJ; Vissink A; Raghoebar GM Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 May; 43(5):626-32. PubMed ID: 24411276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Implant-retained mandibular overdentures with Brånemark System MKII implants: a prospective comparative study between delayed and immediate loading. Chiapasco M; Abati S; Romeo E; Vogel G Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(4):537-46. PubMed ID: 11516001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Marginal Bone Response Around Immediate- and Delayed-Loading Implants Supporting a Locator-Retained Mandibular Overdenture: A Randomized Controlled Study. Schincaglia GP; Rubin S; Thacker S; Dhingra A; Trombelli L; Ioannidou E Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(2):448-58. PubMed ID: 27004292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A retrospective analysis of early and delayed loading of full-arch mandibular prostheses using three different implant systems: clinical results with up to 5 years of loading. Eliasson A; Blomqvist F; Wennerberg A; Johansson A Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Jun; 11(2):134-48. PubMed ID: 18384397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ten-year follow-up of dental implants used for immediate loading in the edentulous mandible: A prospective clinical study. Windael S; Vervaeke S; Wijnen L; Jacquet W; De Bruyn H; Collaert B Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Aug; 20(4):515-521. PubMed ID: 29791063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of narrow- vs. regular-diameter dental implants: a 3-year follow-up. A retrospective study. Zweers J; van Doornik A; Hogendorf EA; Quirynen M; Van der Weijden GA Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Feb; 26(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 24372952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mandibular overdentures: comparative evaluation of prosthodontic maintenance of three different implant systems during the first year of service. Watson GK; Payne AG; Purton DG; Thomson WM Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(3):259-66. PubMed ID: 12066489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of rehabilitation in edentulous patients treated with an immediately loaded complete fixed mandibular prosthesis supported by three implants. Rivaldo EG; Montagner A; Nary H; da Fontoura Frasca LC; Brånemark PI Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):695-702. PubMed ID: 22616065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The influence of healing type on marginal bone levels of implants supporting mandibular overdentures: a randomized clinical study. Mumcu E; Bilhan H; Geckili O Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(4):514-8. PubMed ID: 23257488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Short implants in maxillae and mandibles: a retrospective study with 1 to 8 years of follow-up. Anitua E; Orive G J Periodontol; 2010 Jun; 81(6):819-26. PubMed ID: 20450361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]