These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11422685)

  • 1. Multifactorial analysis of an MOD restored human premolar using auto-mesh finite element approach.
    Lin CL; Chang CH; Ko CC
    J Oral Rehabil; 2001 Jun; 28(6):576-85. PubMed ID: 11422685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Numerical investigation of the factors affecting interfacial stresses in an MOD restored tooth by auto-meshed finite element method.
    Lin CL; Chang CH; Wang CH; Ko CC; Lee HE
    J Oral Rehabil; 2001 Jun; 28(6):517-25. PubMed ID: 11422677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of cavity design preparation on stress values in maxillary premolar: a finite element analysis.
    Kantardzić I; Vasiljević D; Blazić L; Luzanin O
    Croat Med J; 2012 Dec; 53(6):568-76. PubMed ID: 23275322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of occlusal contact and cusp inclination on the biomechanical character of a maxillary premolar: a finite element analysis.
    Liu S; Liu Y; Xu J; Rong Q; Pan S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1238-45. PubMed ID: 24836532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of occlusal restoration on stresses around class V restoration interface: a finite-element study.
    Vasudeva G; Bogra P; Nikhil V; Singh V
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):295-302. PubMed ID: 21891903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of restoration volume on stresses in a mandibular molar: a finite element study.
    Wayne JS; Chande R; Porter HC; Janus C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):925-31. PubMed ID: 24726589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of the mechanical behavior of posterior teeth with amalgam and composite MOD restorations.
    Arola D; Galles LA; Sarubin MF
    J Dent; 2001 Jan; 29(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 11137640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Structural optimization of dental restorations using the principle of adaptive growth.
    Couegnat G; Fok SL; Cooper JE; Qualtrough AJ
    Dent Mater; 2006 Jan; 22(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 16061281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of cavity depth on stresses in a restored tooth.
    Goel VK; Khera SC; Gurusami S; Chen RC
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Feb; 67(2):174-83. PubMed ID: 1538322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficient 3D finite element analysis of dental restorative procedures using micro-CT data.
    Magne P
    Dent Mater; 2007 May; 23(5):539-48. PubMed ID: 16730058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of the indirect restoration design on the fracture resistance: a finite element study.
    Mei ML; Chen YM; Li H; Chu CH
    Biomed Eng Online; 2016 Jan; 15(1):3. PubMed ID: 26758615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of a restored maxillary second premolar tooth by using three-dimensional finite element method.
    Toparli M; Gökay N; Aksoy T
    J Oral Rehabil; 1999 Feb; 26(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 10080314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of failure risks in ceramic restorations for endodontically treated premolar with MOD preparation.
    Lin CL; Chang YH; Pai CA
    Dent Mater; 2011 May; 27(5):431-8. PubMed ID: 21227485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of the restorative procedure factors on stress values in premolar with MOD cavity: a finite element study.
    Kantardžić I; Vasiljević D; Lužanin O; Maravić T; Blažić L
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2018 Oct; 56(10):1875-1886. PubMed ID: 29633113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with Class II composite restorations.
    Reel DC; Mitchell RJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Feb; 61(2):177-80. PubMed ID: 2654362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of interfacial failure around a class V composite restoration analysed by the finite element method.
    Rees JS; Jacobsen PH
    J Oral Rehabil; 2000 Feb; 27(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 10672146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Numerical fatigue 3D-FE modeling of indirect composite-restored posterior teeth.
    Ausiello P; Franciosa P; Martorelli M; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2011 May; 27(5):423-30. PubMed ID: 21227484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Class I and Class II restorations of resin composite: an FE analysis of the influence of modulus of elasticity on stresses generated by occlusal loading.
    Asmussen E; Peutzfeldt A
    Dent Mater; 2008 May; 24(5):600-5. PubMed ID: 17767951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fracture strength and fracture patterns of root filled teeth restored with direct resin restorations.
    Taha NA; Palamara JE; Messer HH
    J Dent; 2011 Aug; 39(8):527-35. PubMed ID: 21620926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of the shape of the layers in photo-cured dental restorations on the shrinkage stress peaks-FEM study.
    Kowalczyk P
    Dent Mater; 2009 Dec; 25(12):e83-91. PubMed ID: 19786300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.