These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11423248)

  • 1. A review of two alternative ultrasound quality assurance programmes.
    Dudley NJ; Griffith K; Houldsworth G; Holloway M; Dunn MA
    Eur J Ultrasound; 2001 Mar; 12(3):233-45. PubMed ID: 11423248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Routine Ultrasound Quality Assurance in a Multi-Unit Radiology Department: A Retrospective Evaluation of Transducer Failures.
    Vitikainen AM; Peltonen JI; Vartiainen E
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1930-1937. PubMed ID: 28634042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality assurance in diagnostic ultrasound.
    Sipilä O; Mannila V; Vartiainen E
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):519-25. PubMed ID: 21144687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Objective performance testing and quality assurance of medical ultrasound equipment.
    Thijssen JM; Weijers G; de Korte CL
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 33(3):460-71. PubMed ID: 17275983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Blinded Comparison between an In-Air Reverberation Method and an Electronic Probe Tester in the Detection of Ultrasound Probe Faults.
    Dudley NJ; Woolley DJ
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Dec; 43(12):2954-2958. PubMed ID: 28967500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. BMUS guidelines for the regular quality assurance testing of ultrasound scanners by sonographers.
    Dudley N; Russell S; Ward B; Hoskins P;
    Ultrasound; 2014 Feb; 22(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 27433187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Early experience with automated B-mode quality assurance tests.
    Dudley NJ; Gibson NM
    Ultrasound; 2014 Feb; 22(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 27433188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality assurance of ultrasound imaging instruments by monitoring the monitor.
    Walker JB; Thorne GC; Halliwell M
    Phys Med Biol; 1993 Nov; 38(11):1601-9. PubMed ID: 8272435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implementation and validation of three automated methods for measuring ultrasound maximum depth of penetration: application to ultrasound quality control.
    Gorny KR; Tradup DJ; Hangiandreou NJ
    Med Phys; 2005 Aug; 32(8):2615-28. PubMed ID: 16193792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography for Liver Disease. A Critical Appraisal of the Many Actors on the Stage.
    Piscaglia F; Salvatore V; Mulazzani L; Cantisani V; Schiavone C
    Ultraschall Med; 2016 Feb; 37(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 26871407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality assurance in ultrasound screening for hepatocellular carcinoma using a standardized phantom and standard clinical images: a 3-year national investigation in Korea.
    Choi JI; Jung SE; Kim PN; Cha SH; Jun JK; Lee HY; Park EC
    J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Jun; 33(6):985-95. PubMed ID: 24866605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Functional properties of diagnostic ultrasound instruments. A concept of trial building blocks for implementing quality assurance].
    Trier HG
    Ultraschall Med; 1994 Oct; 15(5):223-32. PubMed ID: 7801092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigation of the suitability of tissue phantoms for testing the constancy of ultrasonic transducer arrays in quality assurance.
    Rosenfeld E; Wolter S; Kopp A; Liebscher E
    Ultraschall Med; 2012 Jun; 33(3):289-94. PubMed ID: 22576698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A quality assurance program for the on-board imagers.
    Yoo S; Kim GY; Hammoud R; Elder E; Pawlicki T; Guan H; Fox T; Luxton G; Yin FF; Munro P
    Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4431-47. PubMed ID: 17153422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A simple uniformity test for ultrasound phased arrays.
    Dudley NJ; Woolley DJ
    Phys Med; 2016 Sep; 32(9):1162-6. PubMed ID: 27546869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A review of Doppler ultrasound quality assurance protocols and test devices.
    Browne JE
    Phys Med; 2014 Nov; 30(7):742-51. PubMed ID: 25212384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Technical Note: The design, construction, and evaluation of a liquid-based single phantom solution for TG128 brachytherapy ultrasound QA.
    Leong B; Ostyn M; Oh S; Kim S
    Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):1024-1029. PubMed ID: 30472737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Technical quality assurance in diagnostic ultrasound in outpatient care in Germany].
    Pfandzelter R; Sander G; Balhar T; Langer M
    Ultraschall Med; 2012 Dec; 33(6):574-80. PubMed ID: 22872382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reproducibility of phantom-based quality assurance parameters in real-time ultrasound imaging.
    Sipilä O; Blomqvist P; Jauhiainen M; Kilpeläinen T; Malaska P; Mannila V; Vinnurva-Jussila T; Virsula S
    Acta Radiol; 2011 Jul; 52(6):665-9. PubMed ID: 21508202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A review of the recommendations governing quality assurance of ultrasound systems used for guidance in prostate brachytherapy.
    Doyle AJ; King DM; Browne JE
    Phys Med; 2017 Dec; 44():51-57. PubMed ID: 29254591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.