These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11423452)
1. Effect of digital image compression on screening for diabetic retinopathy. Newsom RS; Clover A; Costen MT; Sadler J; Newton J; Luff AJ; Canning CR Br J Ophthalmol; 2001 Jul; 85(7):799-802. PubMed ID: 11423452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of video display on the grading of diabetic retinopathy. Costen MT; Newsom RS; Parkin B; Marsh CS; Mehta RL; Luff AJ; Canning CR Eye (Lond); 2004 Feb; 18(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 14762410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Web-based grading of compressed stereoscopic digital photography versus standard slide film photography for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy. Rudnisky CJ; Tennant MT; Weis E; Ting A; Hinz BJ; Greve MD Ophthalmology; 2007 Sep; 114(9):1748-54. PubMed ID: 17368543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing diabetic retinopathy using two-field digital photography and the influence of JPEG-compression. Stellingwerf C; Hardus PL; Hooymans JM Doc Ophthalmol; 2004 May; 108(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 15573944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fred Hollows lecture: digital screening for eye disease. Constable IJ; Yogesan K; Eikelboom R; Barry C; Cuypers M Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2000 Jun; 28(3):129-32. PubMed ID: 10981779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is digital image compression acceptable within diabetic retinopathy screening? Basu A; Kamal AD; Illahi W; Khan M; Stavrou P; Ryder RE Diabet Med; 2003 Sep; 20(9):766-71. PubMed ID: 12925059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. JPEG compression of stereoscopic digital images for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy via teleophthalmology. Baker CF; Rudnisky CJ; Tennant MT; Sanghera P; Hinz BJ; De Leon AR; Greve MD Can J Ophthalmol; 2004 Dec; 39(7):746-54. PubMed ID: 15696764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An observational study to assess if automated diabetic retinopathy image assessment software can replace one or more steps of manual imaging grading and to determine their cost-effectiveness. Tufail A; Kapetanakis VV; Salas-Vega S; Egan C; Rudisill C; Owen CG; Lee A; Louw V; Anderson J; Liew G; Bolter L; Bailey C; Sadda S; Taylor P; Rudnicka AR Health Technol Assess; 2016 Dec; 20(92):1-72. PubMed ID: 27981917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Screening for diabetic retinopathy using digital colour photography and oral fluorescein angiography. Newsom R; Moate B; Casswell T Eye (Lond); 2000 Aug; 14 ( Pt 4)():579-82. PubMed ID: 11040903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can digitised colour 35 mm transparencies be used to diagnose diabetic retinopathy? George LD; Leverton C; Young S; Lusty J; Dunstan FD; Owens DR Diabet Med; 1997 Nov; 14(11):970-3. PubMed ID: 9400922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the effect of JPEG and JPEG2000 image compression on the detection of diabetic retinopathy. Conrath J; Erginay A; Giorgi R; Lecleire-Collet A; Vicaut E; Klein JC; Gaudric A; Massin P Eye (Lond); 2007 Apr; 21(4):487-93. PubMed ID: 16456597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of digital retinal images and 35 mm colour transparencies in detecting and grading diabetic retinopathy. George LD; Halliwell M; Hill R; Aldington SJ; Lusty J; Dunstan F; Owens DR Diabet Med; 1998 Mar; 15(3):250-3. PubMed ID: 9545127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of software manipulation (Photoshop) of digitised retinal images on the grading of diabetic retinopathy. George LD; Lusty J; Owens DR; Ollerton RL Br J Ophthalmol; 1999 Aug; 83(8):911-3. PubMed ID: 10413691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection of diabetic retinopathy: a comparison between red-free digital images and colour transparencies. von Wendt G; Summanen P; Hallnäs K; Algvere P; Heikkilä K; Seregard S Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2005 May; 243(5):427-32. PubMed ID: 15729542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of mydriasis and different field strategies on digital image screening of diabetic eye disease. Murgatroyd H; Ellingford A; Cox A; Binnie M; Ellis JD; MacEwen CJ; Leese GP Br J Ophthalmol; 2004 Jul; 88(7):920-4. PubMed ID: 15205238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic accuracy of diabetic retinopathy grading by an artificial intelligence-enabled algorithm compared with a human standard for wide-field true-colour confocal scanning and standard digital retinal images. Olvera-Barrios A; Heeren TF; Balaskas K; Chambers R; Bolter L; Egan C; Tufail A; Anderson J Br J Ophthalmol; 2021 Feb; 105(2):265-270. PubMed ID: 32376611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Digital image compression should be limited in diabetic retinopathy screening. Basu A J Telemed Telecare; 2006; 12(4):163-5. PubMed ID: 16774695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy and reliability of retinal photo grading for diabetic retinopathy: Remote graders from a developing country and standard retinal photo grader in Australia. Islam FMA PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0179310. PubMed ID: 28632764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparability of digital photography with the ETDRS film protocol for evaluation of diabetic retinopathy severity. Li HK; Danis RP; Hubbard LD; Florez-Arango JF; Esquivel A; Krupinski EA Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Jul; 52(7):4717-25. PubMed ID: 21345979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]