BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11423505)

  • 1. Use of an automated device for alternative site blood glucose monitoring.
    Fineberg SE; Bergenstal RM; Bernstein RM; Laffel LM; Schwartz SL
    Diabetes Care; 2001 Jul; 24(7):1217-20. PubMed ID: 11423505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Physiological influences on off-finger glucose testing.
    McGarraugh G; Price D; Schwartz S; Weinstein R
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2001; 3(3):367-76. PubMed ID: 11762515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cross-sectional investigation on the accuracy of alternate site glucose testing using the Soft-Sense glucose meter.
    Pfützner A; Hermanns N; Schröder S; Wegenstein M; Larbig M; Mondok A; Forst T; Haak T
    Swiss Med Wkly; 2002 Jun; 132(25-26):351-7. PubMed ID: 12422292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Alternate site blood glucose testing: do patients prefer it?
    Tieszen KL; New JP
    Diabet Med; 2003 Apr; 20(4):325-8. PubMed ID: 12675648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Alternative site blood glucose testing: a multicenter study.
    Fedele D; Corsi A; Noacco C; Prisco F; Squatrito S; Torre E; Iafusco D; Errico MK; Toniato R; Nicolucci A; Franciosi M; De Berardis G; Neri L
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2003; 5(6):983-9. PubMed ID: 14709201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Forearm blood glucose testing in diabetes mellitus.
    Greenhalgh S; Bradshaw S; Hall CM; Price DA
    Arch Dis Child; 2004 Jun; 89(6):516-8. PubMed ID: 15155393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance evaluation and labeling comprehension of a new blood glucose monitoring system with integrated information management.
    List SM; Starks N; Baum J; Greene C; Pardo S; Parkes JL; Schachner HC; Cuddihy R
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2011 Sep; 5(5):1144-53. PubMed ID: 22027308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multisite evaluation of a new diabetes self-test for glucose and glycated protein (fructosamine).
    Edelman SV; Callahan P; Deeb LC
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2000; 2(2):233-8. PubMed ID: 11469264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rapid changes in postprandial blood glucose produce concentration differences at finger, forearm, and thigh sampling sites.
    Ellison JM; Stegmann JM; Colner SL; Michael RH; Sharma MK; Ervin KR; Horwitz DL
    Diabetes Care; 2002 Jun; 25(6):961-4. PubMed ID: 12032099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of alternate site testing--comparing arm and finger blood glucose results in glucose dynamic states.
    Lock JP; Szuts EZ; Malomo KJ; Anagnostopoulos A; Rao S
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2002; 4(1):87-9. PubMed ID: 12017426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gingival crevicular blood for assessment of blood glucose in diabetic patients.
    Parker RC; Rapley JW; Isley W; Spencer P; Killoy WJ
    J Periodontol; 1993 Jul; 64(7):666-72. PubMed ID: 8366416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Investigation on the accuracy of the blood glucose monitoring device Prestige IQ.
    Larbig M; Forst T; Mondok A; Forst S; Pfützner A
    Diabetes Nutr Metab; 2003 Aug; 16(4):257-61. PubMed ID: 14768776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy and utility of a 10-test disk blood glucose meter.
    Kendall DM; Kaplan RA; Paulson CF; Parkes JL; Tideman AM
    Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2005 Jan; 67(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 15620431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The clinical performance and ease of use of a blood glucose meter that uses a 10-test disk.
    Garg SK; Carter JA; Mullen L; Folker AC; Parkes JL; Tideman AM
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2004 Aug; 6(4):495-502. PubMed ID: 15321005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical and technical evaluation of a new self-monitoring blood glucose meter: assessment of analytical and user error.
    Lehmann R; Kayrooz S; Greuter H; Spinas GA
    Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2001 Aug; 53(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 11403861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance of the DIDGET blood glucose monitoring system in children, teens, and young adults.
    Deeb LC; Parkes JL; Pardo S; Schachner HC; Viggiani MT; Wallace J; Bailey T
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2011 Sep; 5(5):1157-63. PubMed ID: 22027310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of the CONTOUR® blood glucose monitoring system.
    Harrison B; Leazenby C; Halldorsdottir S
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2011 Jul; 5(4):1009-13. PubMed ID: 21880245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Capillary blood sampling for self-monitoring of blood glucose.
    Yum SI; Roe J
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 1999; 1(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 11475301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. New features and performance of a next-generation SEVEN-day continuous glucose monitoring system with short lag time.
    Bailey T; Zisser H; Chang A
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2009 Dec; 11(12):749-55. PubMed ID: 20001675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Prospective Multicenter Evaluation of the Accuracy of a Novel Implanted Continuous Glucose Sensor: PRECISE II.
    Christiansen MP; Klaff LJ; Brazg R; Chang AR; Levy CJ; Lam D; Denham DS; Atiee G; Bode BW; Walters SJ; Kelley L; Bailey TS
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2018 Mar; 20(3):197-206. PubMed ID: 29381090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.