156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11423505)
21. Comparison of glucose levels in capillary blood samples obtained from a variety of body sites.
Peled N; Wong D; Gwalani SL
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2002; 4(1):35-44; discussion 45-7. PubMed ID: 12017418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Noninvasive, continuous, real-time glucose measurements compared to reference laboratory venous plasma glucose values.
Hadar E; Chen R; Toledano Y; Tenenbaum-Gavish K; Atzmon Y; Hod M
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Oct; 32(20):3393-3400. PubMed ID: 29635953
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Clinical evaluation of a novel test strip technology for blood glucose monitoring: accuracy at hypoglycaemic glucose levels.
Bellary S; Cameron H; Macleod K; Malecha M; Koria K; Raja P; Cabezudo JD; Ellison J
Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2012 Dec; 98(3):430-5. PubMed ID: 23063304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Palm glucose readings compared with fingertip readings under steady and dynamic glycemic conditions, using the OneTouch Ultra Blood Glucose Monitoring System.
Kempe KC; Budd D; Stern M; Ellison JM; Saari LA; Adiletto CA; Olin B; Price DA; Horwitz DL
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2005 Dec; 7(6):916-26. PubMed ID: 16386098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A comprehensive evaluation of strip performance in multiple blood glucose monitoring systems.
Katz LB; Macleod K; Grady M; Cameron H; Pfützner A; Setford S
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2015 May; 12(3):263-71. PubMed ID: 25702769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluation of OneTouch Verio(®), a new blood glucose self-monitoring system for patients with diabetes.
Littmann K; Petersen ER; Pussinen C; Danielson K; Djurisic S; Eilertsen H; Garabet L; Greibe E; Lauritzen T; Olsen DA; Othman S; Palimaru I; Westerlund J
Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2013; 73(4):286-92. PubMed ID: 23473019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Automated near-continuous glucose monitoring measured in plasma using mid-infrared spectroscopy.
Jax T; Heise T; Nosek L; Gable J; Lim G; Calentine C
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2011 Mar; 5(2):345-52. PubMed ID: 21527104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Performance analysis of the OneTouch UltraVue blood glucose monitoring system.
Chang A; Orth A; Le B; Menchavez P; Miller L
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2009 Sep; 3(5):1158-65. PubMed ID: 20144431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Numerical and clinical precision of continuous glucose monitoring in Colombian patients treated with insulin infusion pump with automated suspension in hypoglycemia.
Gómez AM; Marín Sánchez A; Muñoz OM; Colón Peña CA
Endocrinol Nutr; 2015 Dec; 62(10):485-92. PubMed ID: 26531841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Accuracy and Longevity of an Implantable Continuous Glucose Sensor in the PRECISE Study: A 180-Day, Prospective, Multicenter, Pivotal Trial.
Kropff J; Choudhary P; Neupane S; Barnard K; Bain SC; Kapitza C; Forst T; Link M; Dehennis A; DeVries JH
Diabetes Care; 2017 Jan; 40(1):63-68. PubMed ID: 27815290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Accuracy and user performance evaluation of a blood glucose monitoring system.
Caswell M; Frank J; Viggiani MT; Pardo S; Dunne N; Warchal-Windham ME; Morin R
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2015 Mar; 17(3):152-8. PubMed ID: 25494048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Whole-blood glucose testing at alternate sites: glucose values and hematocrit of capillary blood drawn from fingertip and forearm.
Lock JP; Szuts EZ; Malomo KJ; Anagnostopoulos A
Diabetes Care; 2002 Feb; 25(2):337-41. PubMed ID: 11815506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Device and Method for Noninvasive Glucose Assessment.
Segman YJ
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2018 Nov; 12(6):1159-1168. PubMed ID: 29575926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The FDA reevaluates alternative site testing for blood glucose.
Ginsberg BH
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2002; 4(3):347-9. PubMed ID: 12165174
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. A study of forearm versus finger stick glucose monitoring.
Lee DM; Weinert SE; Miller EE
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2002; 4(1):13-23; discussion 45-7. PubMed ID: 12017415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. System Accuracy Assessment of a Combined Invasive and Noninvasive Glucometer.
Pfützner A; Demircik F; Pfützner J; Kessler K; Strobl S; Spatz J; Pfützner AH; Lier A
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2020 May; 14(3):575-581. PubMed ID: 31640424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Brief report: Comparison of continuous glucose monitoring and finger-prick blood glucose levels in hospitalized patients administered basal-bolus insulin.
Burt MG; Roberts GW; Aguilar-Loza NR; Stranks SN
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2013 Mar; 15(3):241-5. PubMed ID: 23360391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Performance of a new blood glucose monitoring system in the hands of intended users.
Bailey TS; Wallace JF; Parkes JL; Pardo S; Yu J; Schachner HC; Simmons DA; Chu A
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2012 Sep; 14(9):783-9. PubMed ID: 22746838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Clinical evaluation of a continuous minimally invasive glucose flux sensor placed over ultrasonically permeated skin.
Chuang H; Taylor E; Davison TW
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2004 Feb; 6(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 15000766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The use of silicon microfabrication technology in painless blood glucose monitoring.
Smart WH; Subramanian K
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2000; 2(4):549-59. PubMed ID: 11469618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
