These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11424299)

  • 1. Design issues and sample size when exposure measurement is inaccurate.
    Rippin G
    Methods Inf Med; 2001 May; 40(2):137-40. PubMed ID: 11424299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statistical methods for epidemiologic studies of the health effects of air pollution.
    Navidi W; Thomas D; Langholz B; Stram D
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 1999 May; (86):1-50; discussion 51-6. PubMed ID: 10465799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accounting for response misclassification and covariate measurement error improves power and reduces bias in epidemiologic studies.
    Cheng D; Branscum AJ; Stamey JD
    Ann Epidemiol; 2010 Jul; 20(7):562-7. PubMed ID: 20538200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Power and sample size calculations for generalized regression models with covariate measurement error.
    Tosteson TD; Buzas JS; Demidenko E; Karagas M
    Stat Med; 2003 Apr; 22(7):1069-82. PubMed ID: 12652554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of sample size and bias on the reliability of estimates of error: a comparative study of Dahlberg's formula.
    Springate SD
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Apr; 34(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 21447784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Study design for epidemiologic studies with measurement error.
    Holford TR; Stack C
    Stat Methods Med Res; 1995 Dec; 4(4):339-58. PubMed ID: 8745130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The detection of gene-environment interaction for continuous traits: should we deal with measurement error by bigger studies or better measurement?
    Wong MY; Day NE; Luan JA; Chan KP; Wareham NJ
    Int J Epidemiol; 2003 Feb; 32(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 12690008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of multiple indicators on the power to detect inter-individual differences in change.
    von Oertzen T; Hertzog C; Lindenberger U; Ghisletta P
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Nov; 63(Pt 3):627-46. PubMed ID: 20211053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sample size determination for the non-randomised triangular model for sensitive questions in a survey.
    Tian GL; Tang ML; Zhenqiu Liu ; Ming Tan ; Tang NS
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2011 Jun; 20(3):159-73. PubMed ID: 19221169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Overview of important design issues for a National Human Exposure Assessment Survey.
    Callahan MA; Clickner RP; Whitmore RW; Kalton G; Sexton K
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1995; 5(3):257-82. PubMed ID: 8814772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimating sample size for epidemiologic studies: the impact of ignoring exposure measurement uncertainty.
    Devine OJ; Smith JM
    Stat Med; 1998 Jun; 17(12):1375-89. PubMed ID: 9682326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Sample selection in epidemiologic studies].
    Zieliński A
    Przegl Epidemiol; 2002; 56(3):489-98. PubMed ID: 12608099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fully parametric and semi-parametric regression models for common events with covariate measurement error in main study/validation study designs.
    Spiegelman D; Casella M
    Biometrics; 1997 Jun; 53(2):395-409. PubMed ID: 9192443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Blinded and unblinded internal pilot study designs for clinical trials with count data.
    Schneider S; Schmidli H; Friede T
    Biom J; 2013 Jul; 55(4):617-33. PubMed ID: 23703749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Classification bias in epidemiological studies].
    Zieliński A
    Przegl Epidemiol; 2008; 62(2):461-70. PubMed ID: 18807495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Combination of direct and indirect approaches for exposure assessment.
    Duan N; Mage DT
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1997; 7(4):439-70. PubMed ID: 9306231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Key elements in the statistical analysis of surveys.
    Berchtold A
    Int J Public Health; 2007; 52(2):117-9. PubMed ID: 18704291
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sample size calculations for paired or matched ordinal data.
    Julious SA; Campbell MJ
    Stat Med; 1998 Jul; 17(14):1635-42. PubMed ID: 9699235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sample Size Estimation for Random-effects Models: Balancing Precision and Feasibility in Panel Studies.
    Weichenthal S; Baumgartner J; Hanley JA
    Epidemiology; 2017 Nov; 28(6):817-826. PubMed ID: 28957035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Power and sample size calculations in case-control studies of gene-environment interactions: comments on different approaches.
    García-Closas M; Lubin JH
    Am J Epidemiol; 1999 Apr; 149(8):689-92. PubMed ID: 10206617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.