BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11424645)

  • 21. Learning to read and spell in Persian: a cross-sectional study from Grades 1 to 4.
    Rahbari N; Sénéchal M
    Dev Psychol; 2010 Nov; 46(6):1514-27. PubMed ID: 20677856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The development of the orthographic consistency effect in speech recognition: from sublexical to lexical involvement.
    Ventura P; Morais J; Kolinsky R
    Cognition; 2007 Dec; 105(3):547-76. PubMed ID: 17250820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Orthographic combinability and phonological consistency effects in reading Chinese phonograms: an event-related potential study.
    Hsu CH; Tsai JL; Lee CY; Tzeng OJ
    Brain Lang; 2009 Jan; 108(1):56-66. PubMed ID: 18951624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. From orthography to phonetics: ERP measures of grapheme-to-phoneme conversion mechanisms in reading.
    Proverbio AM; Vecchi L; Zani A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Mar; 16(2):301-17. PubMed ID: 15068599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Orthographic neighborhood effects in reading Chinese two-character words.
    Huang HW; Lee CY; Tsai JL; Lee CL; Hung DL; Tzeng OJ
    Neuroreport; 2006 Jul; 17(10):1061-5. PubMed ID: 16791104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Phonological codes are assembled before word fixation: evidence from boundary paradigm in sentence reading.
    Miellet S; Sparrow L
    Brain Lang; 2004; 90(1-3):299-310. PubMed ID: 15172547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The use of the orthographic lexicon in reading kana words.
    Yamada J; Imai H; Ikebe Y
    J Gen Psychol; 1990 Jul; 117(3):311-23. PubMed ID: 2213002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Sequential processing in hemispheric word recognition: the impact of initial letter discriminability on the OUP naming effect.
    Lindell AK; Nicholls ME; Kwantes PJ; Castles A
    Brain Lang; 2005 May; 93(2):160-72. PubMed ID: 15781304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Qualitative differences between the joint effects of stimulus quality and word frequency in reading aloud and lexical decision: extensions to Yap and Balota (2007).
    O'Malley S; Reynolds MG; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):451-8. PubMed ID: 17352625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. ERP correlates of the development of orthographical and phonological processing during Chinese sentence reading.
    Meng X; Jian J; Shu H; Tian X; Zhou X
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1219():91-102. PubMed ID: 18539265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Do readers obtain preview benefit from word N + 2? A test of serial attention shift versus distributed lexical processing models of eye movement control in reading.
    Rayner K; Juhasz BJ; Brown SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):230-45. PubMed ID: 17311490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Exposure to print and word recognition processes.
    Chateau D; Jared D
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Jan; 28(1):143-53. PubMed ID: 10714145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The cross-script length effect: further evidence challenging PDP models of reading aloud.
    Rastle K; Havelka J; Wydell TN; Coltheart M; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):238-46. PubMed ID: 19210093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Phonological and semantic information in adults' orthographic learning.
    Chalmers KA; Burt JS
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 May; 128(1):162-75. PubMed ID: 18234152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Orthographic neighborhood size effect in Chinese character naming: orthographic and phonological activations.
    Li QL; Bi HY; Wei TQ; Chen BG
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Jan; 136(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 20970102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. What does rapid automatized naming measure? A new RAN task compared to naming and lexical decision.
    Wile TL; Borowsky R
    Brain Lang; 2004; 90(1-3):47-62. PubMed ID: 15172524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Syllables and bigrams: orthographic redundancy and syllabic units affect visual word recognition at different processing levels.
    Conrad M; Carreiras M; Tamm S; Jacobs AM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Apr; 35(2):461-79. PubMed ID: 19331501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Measurements of auditory-verbal STM span in aphasia: effects of item, task, and lexical impairment.
    Martin N; Ayala J
    Brain Lang; 2004 Jun; 89(3):464-83. PubMed ID: 15120538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The neural bases of the pseudohomophone effect: Phonological constraints on lexico-semantic access in reading.
    Braun M; Hutzler F; Münte TF; Rotte M; Dambacher M; Richlan F; Jacobs AM
    Neuroscience; 2015 Jun; 295():151-63. PubMed ID: 25805695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Single- versus dual-process models of lexical decision performance: insights from response time distributional analysis.
    Yap MJ; Balota DA; Cortese MJ; Watson JM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Dec; 32(6):1324-44. PubMed ID: 17154775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.