These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11424653)

  • 21. Reducing color-color interference by optimizing selection for action.
    La Heij W; Kaptein NA; Kalff AC; de Lange L
    Psychol Res; 1995; 57(2):119-30. PubMed ID: 7708897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Attentional blink for color.
    Ross NE; Jolicoeur P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1999 Dec; 25(6):1483-94. PubMed ID: 10681214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The role of spatial switching in the attentional blink.
    Berthet V; Kouider S
    Span J Psychol; 2012 Mar; 15(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 22379692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Two attentional deficits in serial target search: the visual attentional blink and an amodal task-switch deficit.
    Potter MC; Chun MM; Banks BS; Muckenhoupt M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1998 Jul; 24(4):979-92. PubMed ID: 9699304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Revisiting within-modality and cross-modality attentional blinks: effects of target-distractor similarity.
    Arnell KM; Jenkins R
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Oct; 66(7):1147-61. PubMed ID: 15751472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The attentional blink and lag 1 sparing are nonspatial.
    Lunau R; Olivers CN
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):317-25. PubMed ID: 20139448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Negative attentional set in the attentional blink: control is not lost.
    Zhang D; Zhou X; Martens S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Nov; 73(8):2489-501. PubMed ID: 21901571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Intertrial repetition facilitates selection in time: common mechanisms underlie spatial and temporal search.
    Yashar A; Lamy D
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Feb; 21(2):243-51. PubMed ID: 20424053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The serial process in visual search.
    Gilden DL; Thornton TL; Marusich LR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Jun; 36(3):533-542. PubMed ID: 20515187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. T1 difficulty affects the AB: manipulating T1 word frequency and T1 orthographic neighbor frequency.
    Burt JS; Howard S; Falconer EK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Apr; 73(3):751-65. PubMed ID: 21264711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Strategies of flanker coprocessing in single and dual tasks.
    Hübner R; Lehle C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):103-23. PubMed ID: 17311482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Temporal selection is suppressed, delayed, and diffused during the attentional blink.
    Vul E; Nieuwenstein M; Kanwisher N
    Psychol Sci; 2008 Jan; 19(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 18181792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. How to keep attention from straying: get engaged!
    Folk CL; Ester EF; Troemel K
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Feb; 16(1):127-32. PubMed ID: 19145022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of similarity, difficulty, and nontarget presentation on the time course of visual attention.
    Ward R; Duncan J; Shapiro K
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 May; 59(4):593-600. PubMed ID: 9158333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The attentional blink: a review of data and theory.
    Dux PE; Marois R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Nov; 71(8):1683-700. PubMed ID: 19933555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Prior entry explains order reversals in the attentional blink.
    Olivers CN; Hilkenmeier F; Scharlau I
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jan; 73(1):53-67. PubMed ID: 21258909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The role of perceptual load in processing distractor faces.
    Lavie N; Ro T; Russell C
    Psychol Sci; 2003 Sep; 14(5):510-5. PubMed ID: 12930485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Top-down and bottom-up attentional control: on the nature of interference from a salient distractor.
    Kim MS; Cave KR
    Percept Psychophys; 1999 Aug; 61(6):1009-23. PubMed ID: 10497423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Serial and parallel attentive visual searches: evidence from cumulative distribution functions of response times.
    Sung K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1372-88. PubMed ID: 19045981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Attentional changes during implicit learning: signal validity protects a target stimulus from the attentional blink.
    Livesey EJ; Harris IM; Harris JA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):408-22. PubMed ID: 19271855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.