These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11425132)

  • 1. Using statistical decision theory to predict speech intelligibility. I. Model structure.
    Müsch H; Buus S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jun; 109(6):2896-909. PubMed ID: 11425132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using statistical decision theory to predict speech intelligibility. II. Measurement and prediction of consonant-discrimination performance.
    Müsch H; Buus S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jun; 109(6):2910-20. PubMed ID: 11425133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using statistical decision theory to predict speech intelligibility. III. Effect of audibility on speech recognition sensitivity.
    Müsch H; Buus S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Oct; 116(4 Pt 1):2223-33. PubMed ID: 15532654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modelling speech intelligibility in adverse conditions.
    Jørgensen S; Dau T
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():343-51. PubMed ID: 23716240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantifying the intelligibility of speech in noise for non-native listeners.
    van Wijngaarden SJ; Steeneken HJ; Houtgast T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Apr; 111(4):1906-16. PubMed ID: 12002873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing.
    Jørgensen S; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1475-87. PubMed ID: 21895088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Binaural prediction of speech intelligibility in reverberant rooms with multiple noise sources.
    Lavandier M; Jelfs S; Culling JF; Watkins AJ; Raimond AP; Makin SJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):218-31. PubMed ID: 22280586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Envelope and intensity based prediction of psychoacoustic masking and speech intelligibility.
    Biberger T; Ewert SD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Aug; 140(2):1023. PubMed ID: 27586734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intelligibility of conversational and clear speech in noise and reverberation for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Payton KL; Uchanski RM; Braida LD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Mar; 95(3):1581-92. PubMed ID: 8176061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A model for multitalker speech perception.
    Srinivasan S; Wang D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Nov; 124(5):3213-24. PubMed ID: 19045805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech to infants as hyperspeech: knowledge-driven processes in early word recognition.
    Fernald A
    Phonetica; 2000; 57(2-4):242-54. PubMed ID: 10992144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intelligibility measurements in speech disorders: a critical review of the literature.
    Barreto Sdos S; Ortiz KZ
    Pro Fono; 2008; 20(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 18852969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Revision and validation of a binaural model for speech intelligibility in noise.
    Jelfs S; Culling JF; Lavandier M
    Hear Res; 2011 May; 275(1-2):96-104. PubMed ID: 21156201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech intelligibility prediction in reverberation: Towards an integrated model of speech transmission, spatial unmasking, and binaural de-reverberation.
    Leclère T; Lavandier M; Culling JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3335-45. PubMed ID: 26093423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of noise and filtering on the intelligibility of speech produced during simultaneous communication.
    MacKenzie DJ; Schiavetti N; Whitehead RL; Metz DE
    J Commun Disord; 2004; 37(6):505-15. PubMed ID: 15450438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recognition memory in noise for speech of varying intelligibility.
    Gilbert RC; Chandrasekaran B; Smiljanic R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):389-99. PubMed ID: 24437779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of noise suppression on intelligibility. II: An attempt to validate physical metrics.
    Hilkhuysen G; Gaubitch N; Brookes M; Huckvale M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):439-50. PubMed ID: 24437784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modeling the effects of a single reflection on binaural speech intelligibility.
    Rennies J; Warzybok A; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1556-67. PubMed ID: 24606290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modeling speech intelligibility in quiet and noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Rhebergen KS; Lyzenga J; Dreschler WA; Festen JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Mar; 127(3):1570-83. PubMed ID: 20329857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.