These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11425137)

  • 21. Audiovisual temporal discrimination is less efficient with aging: an event-related potential study.
    Setti A; Finnigan S; Sobolewski R; McLaren L; Robertson IH; Reilly RB; Kenny RA; Newell FN
    Neuroreport; 2011 Aug; 22(11):554-8. PubMed ID: 21691233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of age and frequency disparity on gap discrimination.
    Lister J; Besing J; Koehnke J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jun; 111(6):2793-800. PubMed ID: 12083214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effects of aging and interaural delay on the detection of a break in the interaural correlation between two sounds.
    Li L; Huang J; Wu X; Qi JG; Schneider BA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):273-86. PubMed ID: 19194287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Interference and enhancement effects on interaural time discrimination and level discrimination in listeners with normal hearing and those with hearing loss.
    Smith-Olinde L; Besing J; Koehnke J
    Am J Audiol; 2004 Jun; 13(1):80-95. PubMed ID: 15248807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Duration discrimination of speech and tonal complex stimuli by normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bochner JH; Snell KB; MacKenzie DJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Aug; 84(2):493-500. PubMed ID: 3170942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. MMN evidence for asymmetry in detection of IOI shortening and lengthening at behavioral indifference tempo.
    Lai Y; Tian Y; Yao D
    Brain Res; 2011 Jan; 1367():170-80. PubMed ID: 21029729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Visual-auditory differences in duration discrimination depend on modality-specific, sensory-automatic temporal processing: Converging evidence for the validity of the Sensory-Automatic Timing Hypothesis.
    Rammsayer T; Pichelmann S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Nov; 71(11):2364-2377. PubMed ID: 30362412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Differential sensitivity to tonal frequency and to the rate of amplitude modulation of broadband noise by normally hearing listeners.
    Formby C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Jul; 78(1 Pt 1):70-7. PubMed ID: 4019909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Temporal order discrimination of tonal sequences by younger and older adults: the role of duration and rate.
    Shrivastav MN; Humes LE; Aylsworth L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jul; 124(1):462-71. PubMed ID: 18646990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Influence of temporal aspects in auditory temporal processing tests].
    Murphy CF; Schochat E
    Pro Fono; 2007; 19(3):259-66. PubMed ID: 17934601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effects of type of interval, sensory modality, base duration, and psychophysical task on the discrimination of brief time intervals.
    Rammsayer TH
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 May; 76(4):1185-96. PubMed ID: 24596081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Gap duration discrimination in listeners with cochlear hearing loss: effects of gap and marker duration, frequency separation, and mode of presentation.
    Grose JH; Hall JW; Buss E
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2001 Dec; 2(4):388-98. PubMed ID: 11833611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Processing of rapid auditory information in epileptic patients with left temporal lobe damage.
    Ehrlé N; Samson S; Baulac M
    Neuropsychologia; 2001; 39(5):525-31. PubMed ID: 11254935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of temporal position, proportional variance, and proportional duration on decision weights in temporal pattern discrimination.
    Sadralodabai T; Sorkin RD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Jan; 105(1):358-65. PubMed ID: 9921662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Assessment of auditory temporal-order thresholds - a comparison of different measurement procedures and the influences of age and gender.
    Fink M; Churan J; Wittmann M
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2005; 23(5-6):281-96. PubMed ID: 16477090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Sensitivity to the temporal structure of rapid sound sequences - An MEG study.
    Andreou LV; Griffiths TD; Chait M
    Neuroimage; 2015 Apr; 110():194-204. PubMed ID: 25659464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Discrimination of interaural temporal disparities by normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
    Smoski WJ; Trahiotis C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 May; 79(5):1541-7. PubMed ID: 3711453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of age and hearing loss on gap detection and the precedence effect: narrow-band stimuli.
    Lister JJ; Roberts RA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Apr; 48(2):482-93. PubMed ID: 15989406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Perceptual asymmetries in the discrimination of brief auditory time intervals.
    Grondin S; Voyer D; Bisson N
    Laterality; 2011 Sep; 16(5):513-27. PubMed ID: 21128161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.