238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11425142)
1. Providing low- and mid-frequency speech information to listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
Turner CW; Brus SL
J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jun; 109(6):2999-3006. PubMed ID: 11425142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using a vocoder-based frequency-lowering method and spectral enhancement to improve place-of-articulation perception for hearing-impaired listeners.
Kong YY; Mullangi A
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):300-12. PubMed ID: 23165224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. High-frequency audibility: benefits for hearing-impaired listeners.
Hogan CA; Turner CW
J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Jul; 104(1):432-41. PubMed ID: 9670535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stop-consonant recognition for normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. I: The contribution of selected frequency regions.
Dubno JR; Dirks DD; Ellison DE
J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jan; 85(1):347-54. PubMed ID: 2921417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of degree and configuration of hearing loss on the contribution of high- and low-frequency speech information to bilateral speech understanding.
Hornsby BW; Johnson EE; Picou E
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):543-55. PubMed ID: 21336138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Benefits of amplification for speech recognition in background noise.
Turner CW; Henry BA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Oct; 112(4):1675-80. PubMed ID: 12398472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of spectrally asynchronous delays on consonant voicing perception.
Ortmann AJ; Palmer CV; Pratt SR
J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Sep; 21(8):493-511. PubMed ID: 21034697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improving speech audibility with wide dynamic range compression in listeners with severe sensorineural loss.
Souza PE; Bishop RD
Ear Hear; 1999 Dec; 20(6):461-70. PubMed ID: 10613384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stop-consonant recognition for normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. II: Articulation index predictions.
Dubno JR; Dirks DD; Schaefer AB
J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jan; 85(1):355-64. PubMed ID: 2921418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of audibility on better-ear glimpsing as a function of frequency in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Rana B; Buchholz JM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Apr; 143(4):2195. PubMed ID: 29716302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Duration discrimination of speech and tonal complex stimuli by normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Bochner JH; Snell KB; MacKenzie DJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Aug; 84(2):493-500. PubMed ID: 3170942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of frequency selectivity and consonant recognition among hearing-impaired and masked normal-hearing listeners.
Dubno JR; Schaefer AB
J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Apr; 91(4 Pt 1):2110-21. PubMed ID: 1597602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Auditory filter characteristics and consonant recognition for hearing-impaired listeners.
Dubno JR; Dirks DD
J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Apr; 85(4):1666-75. PubMed ID: 2708682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Aided and unaided speech perception by older hearing impaired listeners.
Woods DL; Arbogast T; Doss Z; Younus M; Herron TJ; Yund EW
PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0114922. PubMed ID: 25730423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Proportional frequency compression of speech for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
Turner CW; Hurtig RR
J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Aug; 106(2):877-86. PubMed ID: 10462793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Factors governing speech reception benefits of adaptive linear filtering for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
Rankovic CM
J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Feb; 103(2):1043-57. PubMed ID: 9479758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Recognition of low-pass-filtered consonants in noise with normal and impaired high-frequency hearing.
Horwitz AR; Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB
J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jan; 111(1 Pt 1):409-16. PubMed ID: 11831814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Spectral cues to perception of /d, n, l/ by normal- and impaired-hearing listeners.
Revoile SG; Pickett JM; Kozma-Spytek L
J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Aug; 90(2 Pt 1):787-98. PubMed ID: 1939885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Labeling of /s/ and [see text] by listeners with normal and impaired hearing, revisited.
Hedrick MS; Younger MS
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2003 Jun; 46(3):636-48. PubMed ID: 14696991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The benefits of bimodal hearing: effect of frequency region and acoustic bandwidth.
Sheffield SW; Gifford RH
Audiol Neurootol; 2014; 19(3):151-63. PubMed ID: 24556850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
