These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11425143)

  • 1. Audio-visual enhancement of speech in noise.
    Girin L; Schwartz JL; Feng G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jun; 109(6):3007-20. PubMed ID: 11425143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Eye Can Hear Clearly Now: Inverse Effectiveness in Natural Audiovisual Speech Processing Relies on Long-Term Crossmodal Temporal Integration.
    Crosse MJ; Di Liberto GM; Lalor EC
    J Neurosci; 2016 Sep; 36(38):9888-95. PubMed ID: 27656026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Complementarity and synergy in bimodal speech: auditory, visual, and audio-visual identification of French oral vowels in noise.
    Robert-Ribes J; Schwartz JL; Lallouache T; Escudier P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Jun; 103(6):3677-89. PubMed ID: 9637049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Seeing to hear better: evidence for early audio-visual interactions in speech identification.
    Schwartz JL; Berthommier F; Savariaux C
    Cognition; 2004 Sep; 93(2):B69-78. PubMed ID: 15147940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correlating subword articulation with lip shapes for embedding aware audio-visual speech enhancement.
    Chen H; Du J; Hu Y; Dai LR; Yin BC; Lee CH
    Neural Netw; 2021 Nov; 143():171-182. PubMed ID: 34157642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Intermodal timing cues for audio-visual speech recognition].
    Hashimoto M; Kumashiro M
    J UOEH; 2004 Jun; 26(2):215-25. PubMed ID: 15244074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech enhancement based on neural networks improves speech intelligibility in noise for cochlear implant users.
    Goehring T; Bolner F; Monaghan JJ; van Dijk B; Zarowski A; Bleeck S
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():183-194. PubMed ID: 27913315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A corpus of audio-visual Lombard speech with frontal and profile views.
    Alghamdi N; Maddock S; Marxer R; Barker J; Brown GJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jun; 143(6):EL523. PubMed ID: 29960497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of audio-visual integration on the detection of masked speech and non-speech sounds.
    Eramudugolla R; Henderson R; Mattingley JB
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Feb; 75(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 21067852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of phonetic context on audio-visual intelligibility of French.
    Benoît C; Mohamadi T; Kandel S
    J Speech Hear Res; 1994 Oct; 37(5):1195-203. PubMed ID: 7823561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Audiovisual perception of congruent and incongruent Dutch front vowels.
    Valkenier B; Duyne JY; Andringa TC; Baskent D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Dec; 55(6):1788-801. PubMed ID: 22992710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A universal bias in adult vowel perception - By ear or by eye.
    Masapollo M; Polka L; Ménard L
    Cognition; 2017 Sep; 166():358-370. PubMed ID: 28601721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech identification in noise: Contribution of temporal, spectral, and visual speech cues.
    Kim J; Davis C; Groot C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Dec; 126(6):3246-57. PubMed ID: 20000938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neural indices of phonemic discrimination and sentence-level speech intelligibility in quiet and noise: A P3 study.
    Koerner TK; Zhang Y; Nelson PB; Wang B; Zou H
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():58-67. PubMed ID: 28441570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Audio-visual identification of place of articulation and voicing in white and babble noise.
    Alm M; Behne DM; Wang Y; Eg R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jul; 126(1):377-87. PubMed ID: 19603894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech-In-Noise Comprehension is Improved When Viewing a Deep-Neural-Network-Generated Talking Face.
    Shan T; Wenner CE; Xu C; Duan Z; Maddox RK
    Trends Hear; 2022; 26():23312165221136934. PubMed ID: 36384325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A corpus of noise-induced word misperceptions for Spanish.
    Tóth MA; García Lecumberri ML; Tang Y; Cooke M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):EL184-9. PubMed ID: 25698048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of auditory-visual vowel identification training on speech recognition under difficult listening conditions.
    Richie C; Kewley-Port D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Dec; 51(6):1607-19. PubMed ID: 18695021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recognition of plosive syllables in noise: comparison of an auditory model with human performance.
    Ainsworth WA; Meyer GF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Aug; 96(2 Pt 1):687-94. PubMed ID: 7930068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Binding and unbinding the auditory and visual streams in the McGurk effect.
    Nahorna O; Berthommier F; Schwartz JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1061-77. PubMed ID: 22894226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.