229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11425820)
1. Fresh embryo transfer is more effective than frozen for donor oocyte recipients but not for donors.
Check JH; Choe JK; Nazari A; Fox F; Swenson K
Hum Reprod; 2001 Jul; 16(7):1403-8. PubMed ID: 11425820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the mechanism for higher pregnancy rates in donor oocyte recipients by comparison of fresh with frozen embryo transfer pregnancy rates in a shared oocyte programme.
Check JH; O'Shaughnessy A; Lurie D; Fisher C; Adelson HG
Hum Reprod; 1995 Nov; 10(11):3022-7. PubMed ID: 8747065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Endometrial preparation for women undergoing embryo transfer with frozen embryos or embryos derived from donor oocytes.
Glujovsky D; Pesce R; Fiszbajn G; Sueldo C; Hart RJ; Ciapponi A
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2010 Jan; (1):CD006359. PubMed ID: 20091592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Endometrial preparation in oocyte recipients].
Grzegorczyk-Martin V; Mayenga JM; Kulski O; Belaid Y; Grefenstette I; Belaisch-Allart J
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2012 Sep; 40(9):507-10. PubMed ID: 22906698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The use of the donor oocyte program to evaluate embryo implantation.
Check JH
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1994 Sep; 734():198-208. PubMed ID: 7978918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Long-term evaluation of implantation of fresh and cryopreserved human embryos following ovarian stimulation with buserelin acetate-human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) or clomiphene citrate-HMG.
Van der Elst J; Van den Abbeel E; Camus M; Smitz J; Devroey P; Van Steirteghem A
Hum Reprod; 1996 Oct; 11(10):2097-106. PubMed ID: 8943509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Clinical effects of oocyte cryopreservation in assisted reproduction technology].
Wang W; Yan ZJ; Cai LB; Chai DC; Liu CZ; Mao YD; Liu JY
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Oct; 88(39):2755-8. PubMed ID: 19080449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Shared oocyte donation: society's benefits.
Moomjy M; Mangieri R; Beltramone F; Cholst I; Veeck L; Rosenwaks Z
Fertil Steril; 2000 Jun; 73(6):1165-9. PubMed ID: 10856476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Serum estradiol levels after 4 days of ovarian hyperstimulation in oocyte donors are predictive of embryo quality and clinical outcomes.
Peña JE; Chang PL; Thornton MH; Sauer MV
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2002; 54(4):207-12. PubMed ID: 12592063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How does vitrification affect oocyte viability in oocyte donation cycles? A prospective study to compare outcomes achieved with fresh versus vitrified sibling oocytes.
Solé M; Santaló J; Boada M; Clua E; Rodríguez I; Martínez F; Coroleu B; Barri PN; Veiga A
Hum Reprod; 2013 Aug; 28(8):2087-92. PubMed ID: 23744895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Supraphysiological estradiol levels do not affect oocyte and embryo quality in oocyte donation cycles.
Peña JE; Chang PL; Chan LK; Zeitoun K; Thornton MH; Sauer MV
Hum Reprod; 2002 Jan; 17(1):83-7. PubMed ID: 11756366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Flexibility in starting ovarian stimulation at different phases of the menstrual cycle for treatment of infertile women with the use of in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
Qin N; Chen Q; Hong Q; Cai R; Gao H; Wang Y; Sun L; Zhang S; Guo H; Fu Y; Ai A; Tian H; Lyu Q; Daya S; Kuang Y
Fertil Steril; 2016 Aug; 106(2):334-341.e1. PubMed ID: 27114329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of starting ovarian stimulation on day 2 versus day 15 of the menstrual cycle in the same oocyte donor and pregnancy rates among the corresponding recipients of vitrified oocytes.
Martínez F; Clua E; Devesa M; Rodríguez I; Arroyo G; González C; Solé M; Tur R; Coroleu B; Barri PN
Fertil Steril; 2014 Nov; 102(5):1307-11. PubMed ID: 25154677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of donor sperm in addition to oocyte donation after repeated implantation failure in normozoospermic patients does not improve live birth rates.
Blázquez A; García D; Rodríguez A; Vassena R; Vernaeve V
Hum Reprod; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2549-2553. PubMed ID: 27609983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of pregnancy outcomes in anonymous shared versus exclusive donor oocyte in vitro fertilization cycles.
Mullin CM; Fino ME; Talebian S; Keegan D; Grifo JA; Licciardi F
Fertil Steril; 2010 Feb; 93(2):574-8. PubMed ID: 19815192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A two- versus three-embryo transfer: the oocyte donation model.
Licciardi F; Berkeley AS; Krey L; Grifo J; Noyes N
Fertil Steril; 2001 Mar; 75(3):510-3. PubMed ID: 11239533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Conventional ovarian stimulation and single embryo transfer for IVF/ICSI. How many oocytes do we need to maximize cumulative live birth rates after utilization of all fresh and frozen embryos?
Drakopoulos P; Blockeel C; Stoop D; Camus M; de Vos M; Tournaye H; Polyzos NP
Hum Reprod; 2016 Feb; 31(2):370-6. PubMed ID: 26724797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Difference in birth weight of consecutive sibling singletons is not found in oocyte donation when comparing fresh versus frozen embryo replacements.
Galliano D; Garrido N; Serra-Serra V; Pellicer A
Fertil Steril; 2015 Dec; 104(6):1411-8.e1-3. PubMed ID: 26363384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Freeze-all, oocyte vitrification, or fresh embryo transfer? Lessons from an egg-sharing donation program.
Braga DP; Setti AS; Figueira RC; Azevedo Mde C; Iaconelli A; Lo Turco EG; Borges E
Fertil Steril; 2016 Sep; 106(3):615-22. PubMed ID: 27262501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cumulative live birth rates after one ART cycle including all subsequent frozen-thaw cycles in 1050 women: secondary outcome of an RCT comparing GnRH-antagonist and GnRH-agonist protocols.
Toftager M; Bogstad J; Løssl K; Prætorius L; Zedeler A; Bryndorf T; Nilas L; Pinborg A
Hum Reprod; 2017 Mar; 32(3):556-567. PubMed ID: 28130435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
