These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Legal abortion: the impending obsolescence of the trimester framework. Mangel CP Am J Law Med; 1988; 14(1):69-108. PubMed ID: 3068986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Abortion law today. Field MA J Leg Med; 1993 Mar; 14(1):3-24. PubMed ID: 8463750 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The 1983 abortion decisions: Virginia distinguished. Med Leg Bull; 1983; 32(4):1-7. PubMed ID: 6680764 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The Court and Webster: ethics, politics, and abortion--a panel discussion. Gomez CF; Howard AE; Pinkerton J; Childress JF Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 1990; 53(4):26-30. PubMed ID: 2247520 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The Supreme Court on abortion funding: the second time around. Horan DJ; Marzen TJ St Louis Univ Law J; 1981; 25(2):411-27. PubMed ID: 11655812 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. U.S. Court in New York rejects partial-birth abortion ban. Preston J N Y Times Web; 2004 Aug; ():A12. PubMed ID: 15540363 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Partial-birth abortion, Congress, and the Constitution. Annas GJ N Engl J Med; 1998 Jul; 339(4):279-83. PubMed ID: 9673308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The continuing need for late abortions. Grimes DA JAMA; 1998 Aug; 280(8):747-50. PubMed ID: 9728652 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Webster and the politics of abortion. Annas GJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(2):36-8. PubMed ID: 2703338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis. Peterfy A J Leg Med; 1995 Dec; 16(4):607-36. PubMed ID: 8568420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Abortion 1980: the debate continues. Healey JM Conn Med; 1980 Sep; 44(9):605. PubMed ID: 7408487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The law of human reproduction: an overview. Warren DG J Leg Med; 1982 Mar; 3(1):1-57. PubMed ID: 6979597 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The convergence of abortion regulation in Germany and the United States: a critique of Glendon's Rights Talk thesis. Werner U Loyola Los Angel Int Comp Law J; 1996 Jun; 18(3):571-602. PubMed ID: 11936151 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Justices to review federal ban on disputed abortion method; case may hinge on Alito, Court's newest member. Greenhouse L N Y Times Web; 2006 Feb; ():A1, A14. PubMed ID: 16514736 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Constitutionalizing Roe, Casey and Carhart: a legislative due-process anti-discrimination principle that gives constitutional content to the "undue burden" standard of review applied to abortion control legislation. Van Detta JA South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 2001; 10(2):211-92. PubMed ID: 16485363 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Physician assistant as abortion provider: lessons from Vermont, New York, and Montana. Schirmer JT Hastings Law J; 1997 Nov; 49(1):253-88. PubMed ID: 14758819 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The Supreme Court and abortion: 1. Upholding constitutional principles. Noonan JT Hastings Cent Rep; 1980 Dec; 10(6):14-6. PubMed ID: 7461954 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]