281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11427948)
1. Group sequential test strategies for superiority and non-inferiority hypotheses in active controlled clinical trials.
Wang SJ; Hung HM; Tsong Y; Cui L
Stat Med; 2001 Jul; 20(13):1903-12. PubMed ID: 11427948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Modified Haybittle-Peto group sequential designs for testing superiority and non-inferiority hypotheses in clinical trials.
Lai TL; Shih MC; Zhu G
Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1149-67. PubMed ID: 16189814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A hybrid Bayesian-frequentist approach to evaluate clinical trial designs for tests of superiority and non-inferiority.
Shao Y; Mukhi V; Goldberg JD
Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(4):504-19. PubMed ID: 17854052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. TACT method for non-inferiority testing in active controlled trials.
Wang SJ; Hung HM
Stat Med; 2003 Jan; 22(2):227-38. PubMed ID: 12520559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A new test of non-inferiority for anti-infective trials.
Phillips KF
Stat Med; 2003 Jan; 22(2):201-12. PubMed ID: 12520557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A two-stage sample size recalculation procedure for placebo- and active-controlled non-inferiority trials.
Schwartz TA; Denne JS
Stat Med; 2006 Oct; 25(19):3396-406. PubMed ID: 16900573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Some fundamental issues with non-inferiority testing in active controlled trials.
James Hung HM; Wang SJ; Tsong Y; Lawrence J; O'Neil RT
Stat Med; 2003 Jan; 22(2):213-25. PubMed ID: 12520558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Choosing the analysis population in non-inferiority studies: per protocol or intent-to-treat.
Matilde Sanchez M; Chen X
Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1169-81. PubMed ID: 16397861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A framework for two-stage adaptive procedures to simultaneously test non-inferiority and superiority.
Koyama T; Sampson AR; Gleser LJ
Stat Med; 2005 Aug; 24(16):2439-56. PubMed ID: 15977285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The assessment of non-inferiority in a gold standard design with censored, exponentially distributed endpoints.
Mielke M; Munk A; Schacht A
Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(25):5093-110. PubMed ID: 18570271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multiple-arm superiority and non-inferiority designs with various endpoints.
Chang M
Pharm Stat; 2007; 6(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 17323311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A unifying approach to non-inferiority, equivalence and superiority tests via multiple decision processes.
Hirotsu C
Pharm Stat; 2007; 6(3):193-203. PubMed ID: 17879327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A note on the conservativeness of the confidence interval approach for the selection of non-inferiority margin in the two-arm active-control trial.
Sankoh AJ
Stat Med; 2008 Aug; 27(19):3732-42. PubMed ID: 18407575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Simultaneous test for superiority and noninferiority hypotheses in active-controlled clinical trials.
Tsong Y; Zhang J
J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(2):247-57. PubMed ID: 17365221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rank-based tests for non-inferiority and equivalence hypotheses in multi-centre clinical trials using mixed models.
Rashid MM
Stat Med; 2003 Jan; 22(2):291-311. PubMed ID: 12520563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Strength of evidence of non-inferiority trials-The adjustment of the type I error rate in non-inferiority trials with the synthesis method.
Kang SH; Tsong Y
Stat Med; 2010 Jun; 29(14):1477-87. PubMed ID: 20535762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing non-inferiority of a new treatment in a three-arm clinical trial including a placebo.
Pigeot I; Schäfer J; Röhmel J; Hauschke D
Stat Med; 2003 Mar; 22(6):883-99. PubMed ID: 12627407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing non-inferiority: a combination approach.
Gao P; Ware JH
Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(3):392-406. PubMed ID: 17575568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Power and sample size computations in simultaneous tests for non-inferiority based on relative margins.
Dilba G; Bretz F; Hothorn LA; Guiard V
Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1131-47. PubMed ID: 16217842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Non-inferiority trials: the 'at least as good as' criterion.
Laster LL; Johnson MF
Stat Med; 2003 Jan; 22(2):187-200. PubMed ID: 12520556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
