These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11428428)

  • 1. The Memorandum of Good Practice: theory versus application.
    Sternberg KJ; Lamb ME; Davies GM; Westcott HL
    Child Abuse Negl; 2001 May; 25(5):669-81. PubMed ID: 11428428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing the effectiveness of the NICHD investigative interview protocol when interviewing French-speaking alleged victims of child sexual abuse in Quebec.
    Cyr M; Lamb ME
    Child Abuse Negl; 2009 May; 33(5):257-68. PubMed ID: 19481261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Investigative interviews of child witnesses in Sweden.
    Cederborg AC; Orbach Y; Sternberg KJ; Lamb ME
    Child Abuse Negl; 2000 Oct; 24(10):1355-61. PubMed ID: 11075701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of a structured investigative protocol enhances young children's responses to free-recall prompts in the course of forensic interviews.
    Sternberg KJ; Lamb ME; Orbach Y; Esplin PW; Mitchell S
    J Appl Psychol; 2001 Oct; 86(5):997-1005. PubMed ID: 11596815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of interviewer gender and child gender on the informativeness of alleged child sexual abuse victims in forensic interviews.
    Lamb ME; Garretson ME
    Law Hum Behav; 2003 Apr; 27(2):157-71. PubMed ID: 12733419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Open-ended initial invitations are particularly helpful in eliciting forensically relevant information from child witnesses.
    Danby MC; Sharman SJ
    Child Abuse Negl; 2023 Dec; 146():106505. PubMed ID: 37844459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing the value of structured protocols for forensic interviews of alleged child abuse victims.
    Orbach Y; Hershkowitz I; Lamb ME; Sternberg KJ; Esplin PW; Horowitz D
    Child Abuse Negl; 2000 Jun; 24(6):733-52. PubMed ID: 10888015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Enhancing children's narratives in investigative interviews.
    Orbach Y; Lamb ME
    Child Abuse Negl; 2000 Dec; 24(12):1631-48. PubMed ID: 11197041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of age and delay on the amount of information provided by alleged sex abuse victims in investigative interviews.
    Lamb ME; Sternberg KJ; Esplin PW
    Child Dev; 2000; 71(6):1586-96. PubMed ID: 11194258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differences between accounts provided by witnesses and alleged victims of child sexual abuse.
    Lamb ME; Sternberg KJ; Orbach Y; Hershkowitz I; Horowitz D
    Child Abuse Negl; 2003 Sep; 27(9):1019-31. PubMed ID: 14550329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of multipart prompts on children's testimonies in sexual abuse investigations.
    Katz C; Hershkowitz I
    Child Abuse Negl; 2012; 36(11-12):753-9. PubMed ID: 23069782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Age differences in young children's responses to open-ended invitations in the course of forensic interviews.
    Lamb ME; Sternberg KJ; Orbach Y; Esplin PW; Stewart H; Mitchell S
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 2003 Oct; 71(5):926-34. PubMed ID: 14516241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The relationship between within-interview contradictions and eliciting interviewer utterances.
    Orbach Y; Lamb ME
    Child Abuse Negl; 2001 Mar; 25(3):323-33. PubMed ID: 11414392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The NICHD Investigative Interview Protocol: A Meta-Analytic Review.
    Benia LR; Hauck-Filho N; Dillenburg M; Stein LM
    J Child Sex Abus; 2015; 24(3):259-79. PubMed ID: 25942285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Investigative interviews of alleged sexual abuse victims with and without anatomical dolls.
    Lamb ME; Hershkowitz I; Sternberg KJ; Boat B; Everson MD
    Child Abuse Negl; 1996 Dec; 20(12):1251-9. PubMed ID: 8985616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Talking past each other: Interviewer and child verbal exchanges in forensic interviews.
    Wolfman M; Brown D; Jose P
    Law Hum Behav; 2016 Apr; 40(2):107-17. PubMed ID: 26844909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Cutting Edge of Forensic Interviewing.
    Coulborn Faller K
    J Child Sex Abus; 2020; 29(2):129-137. PubMed ID: 32097109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Setting course: the case for the credentialing of forensic interviewers.
    Haney M; Vieth VI; Campos HM
    J Child Sex Abus; 2010 Nov; 19(6):709-27. PubMed ID: 21113836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dynamics of forensic interviews with suspected abuse victims who do not disclose abuse.
    Hershkowitz I; Orbach Y; Lamb ME; Sternberg KJ; Horowitz D
    Child Abuse Negl; 2006 Jul; 30(7):753-69. PubMed ID: 16846642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using a human figure drawing to elicit information from alleged victims of child sexual abuse.
    Aldridge J; Lamb ME; Sternberg KJ; Orbach Y; Esplin PW; Bowler L
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 2004 Apr; 72(2):304-16. PubMed ID: 15065963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.