These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11429942)

  • 1. The influence of bone mechanical properties and implant fixation upon bone loading around oral implants.
    Van Oosterwyck H; Duyck J; Vander Sloten J; Van der Perre G; De Cooman M; Lievens S; Puers R; Naert I
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1998 Dec; 9(6):407-18. PubMed ID: 11429942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of implant diameter, insertion depth, and loading angle on stress/strain fields in implant/jawbone systems: finite element analysis.
    Qian L; Todo M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):877-86. PubMed ID: 19865628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Finite element analysis of dental implant as orthodontic anchorage.
    Sarmah A; Mathur AK; Gupta V; Pai VS; Nandini S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Jul; 12(4):259-64. PubMed ID: 22186860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Finite element analysis of post dental implant fixation in drilled mandible sites.
    Pirjamalineisiani A; Sarafbidabad M; Jamshidi N; Esfahani FA
    Comput Biol Med; 2017 Feb; 81():159-166. PubMed ID: 28063377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Numeric simulation of time-dependent remodeling of bone around loaded oral implants.
    Eser A; Tonuk E; Akca K; Cehreli MC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):597-608. PubMed ID: 19885399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Three-dimensional numerical simulation of dental implants as orthodontic anchorage.
    Gallas MM; Abeleira MT; Fernández JR; Burguera M
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Feb; 27(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 15743858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stress and strain distribution in the bone surrounding a new design of dental implant: a comparison with a threaded Branemark type implant.
    Clift SE; Fisher J; Watson CJ
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 1993; 207(3):133-8. PubMed ID: 8117364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of optimal taper of immediately loaded wide-diameter implants: a finite element analysis.
    Atieh MA; Shahmiri RA
    J Oral Implantol; 2013 Apr; 39(2):123-32. PubMed ID: 21905902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Investigation of bone inelastic response in interaction phenomena with dental implants.
    Natali AN; Carniel EL; Pavan PG
    Dent Mater; 2008 Apr; 24(4):561-9. PubMed ID: 18207565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing the influence of crestal cortical bone and sinus floor cortical bone in posterior maxilla bi-cortical dental implantation: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Yan X; Zhang X; Chi W; Ai H; Wu L
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2015 May; 73(4):312-20. PubMed ID: 25330164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stress-absorbing elements in dental implants.
    van Rossen IP; Braak LH; de Putter C; de Groot K
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Aug; 64(2):198-205. PubMed ID: 2202819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stimulating effect of implant loading on surrounding bone. Comparison of three numerical models and validation by in vivo data.
    Mellal A; Wiskott HW; Botsis J; Scherrer SS; Belser UC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Apr; 15(2):239-48. PubMed ID: 15008937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of stress pattern generated through various thread designs of dental implants loaded in a condition of immediately after placement and on osseointegration--an FEA study.
    Chowdhary R; Halldin A; Jimbo R; Wennerberg A
    Implant Dent; 2013 Feb; 22(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 23287982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tooth-implant connection: some biomechanical aspects based on finite element analyses.
    Menicucci G; Mossolov A; Mozzati M; Lorenzetti M; Preti G
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2002 Jun; 13(3):334-41. PubMed ID: 12010166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Finite element stress analysis of the influence of staggered versus straight placement of dental implants.
    Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(5):722-30. PubMed ID: 11669255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Three-dimensional finite element analyses of four designs of a high-strength silicon nitride implant.
    Lin S; Shi S; LeGeros RZ; LeGeros JP
    Implant Dent; 2000; 9(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 11307234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Finite element analysis of non-axial versus axial loading of oral implants in the mandible of the dog.
    Barbier L; Vander Sloten J; Krzesinski G; Schepers E; Van der Perre G
    J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Nov; 25(11):847-58. PubMed ID: 9846905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review of the literature.
    Geng JP; Tan KB; Liu GR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):585-98. PubMed ID: 11404759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stress distribution in the single-unit osseointegrated dental implant: finite element analyses of axial and off-axial loading.
    O'Mahony A; Bowles Q; Woolsey G; Robinson SJ; Spencer P
    Implant Dent; 2000; 9(3):207-18. PubMed ID: 11307407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.