These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11430245)

  • 41. Facial aesthetics: babies prefer attractiveness to symmetry.
    Samuels CA; Butterworth G; Roberts T; Graupner L; Hole G
    Perception; 1994; 23(7):823-31. PubMed ID: 7845772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Computational models of facial attractiveness judgments.
    Bronstad PM; Langlois JH; Russell R
    Perception; 2008; 37(1):126-42. PubMed ID: 18399252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Judging Normality and Attractiveness in Faces: Direct Evidence of a More Refined Representation for Own-Race, Young Adult Faces.
    Zhou X; Short LA; Chan HS; Mondloch CJ
    Perception; 2016 Sep; 45(9):973-90. PubMed ID: 27335127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Shape analysis of female facial attractiveness.
    Valenzano DR; Mennucci A; Tartarelli G; Cellerino A
    Vision Res; 2006 Apr; 46(8-9):1282-91. PubMed ID: 16356527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Facial attractiveness: visual impact of symmetry increases significantly towards the midline.
    Springer IN; Wannicke B; Warnke PH; Zernial O; Wiltfang J; Russo PA; Terheyden H; Reinhardt A; Wolfart S
    Ann Plast Surg; 2007 Aug; 59(2):156-62. PubMed ID: 17667409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Facial attractiveness.
    Little AC
    Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci; 2014 Nov; 5(6):621-634. PubMed ID: 26308869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The Influence of Averageness on Adults' Perceptions of Attractiveness: The Effect of Early Visual Deprivation.
    Vingilis-Jaremko L; Maurer D; Rhodes G; Jeffery L
    Perception; 2016 Dec; 45(12):1399-1411. PubMed ID: 27488568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Male facial anthropometry and attractiveness.
    Soler C; Kekäläinen J; Núñez M; Sancho M; Núñez J; Yaber I; Gutiérrez R
    Perception; 2012; 41(10):1234-45. PubMed ID: 23469703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Locating attractiveness in the face space: faces are more attractive when closer to their group prototype.
    Potter T; Corneille O
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Jun; 15(3):615-22. PubMed ID: 18567264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Facial-Attractiveness Choices Are Predicted by Divisive Normalization.
    Furl N
    Psychol Sci; 2016 Oct; 27(10):1379-1387. PubMed ID: 27565534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Measured symmetry of facial 3D shape and perceived facial symmetry and attractiveness before and after orthognathic surgery.
    Ostwald J; Berssenbrügge P; Dirksen D; Runte C; Wermker K; Kleinheinz J; Jung S
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 May; 43(4):521-7. PubMed ID: 25841308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Facial aesthetics: babies prefer attractiveness to symmetry.
    Samuels CA; Butterworth G; Roberts T; Graupner L; Hole G
    Perception; 2013; 42(11):1244-52. PubMed ID: 24601036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Self-perceived attractiveness influences human female preferences for sexual dimorphism and symmetry in male faces.
    Little AC; Burt DM; Penton-Voak IS; Perrett DI
    Proc Biol Sci; 2001 Jan; 268(1462):39-44. PubMed ID: 12123296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Analyses of facial attractiveness on feminised and juvenilised faces.
    Ishi H; Jiro G; Kamachi M; Mukaida S; Akamatsu S
    Perception; 2004; 33(2):135-45. PubMed ID: 15109157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Frontal facial analysis of female celebrity attractiveness standards through artificial intelligence.
    Grillo R; Quinta Reis BA; Lima BC; Peral Ferreira Pinto LA; Melhem-Elias F
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2024 Jun; 52(6):722-726. PubMed ID: 38580557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Facial attractiveness ratings from video-clips and static images tell the same story.
    Rhodes G; Lie HC; Thevaraja N; Taylor L; Iredell N; Curran C; Tan SQ; Carnemolla P; Simmons LW
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(11):e26653. PubMed ID: 22096491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A cross-cultural study of sex-typicality and averageness: Correlation between frontal and lateral measures of human faces.
    Danel DP; Valentova JV; Sánchez OR; Leongómez JD; Varella MAC; Kleisner K
    Am J Hum Biol; 2018 Sep; 30(5):e23147. PubMed ID: 30328226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Morphological quantitative criteria and aesthetic evaluation of eight female Han face types.
    Zhao Q; Zhou R; Zhang X; Sun H; Lu X; Xia D; Song M; Liang Y
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2013 Apr; 37(2):445-53. PubMed ID: 23404449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Preferences for symmetry in human faces in two cultures: data from the UK and the Hadza, an isolated group of hunter-gatherers.
    Little AC; Apicella CL; Marlowe FW
    Proc Biol Sci; 2007 Dec; 274(1629):3113-7. PubMed ID: 17925281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Specialised higher-level mechanisms for facial-symmetry perception: evidence from orientation-tuning functions.
    Rhodes G; Peters M; Ewing LA
    Perception; 2007; 36(12):1804-12. PubMed ID: 18283930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.