These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11431936)
21. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems. Marshall NW Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Entrance surface dose and image quality: comparison of adult chest and abdominal X-ray examinations in general practitioner clinics, public and private hospitals in Malaysia. Hambali AS; Ng KH; Abdullah BJ; Wang HB; Jamal N; Spelic DC; Suleiman OH Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Jan; 133(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 19223292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Comparison of four digital and one conventional radiographic image systems for the chest in a patient study with subsequent system optimization]. Redlich U; Hoeschen C; Effenberger O; Fessel A; Preuss H; Reissberg S; Scherlach C; Döhring W Rofo; 2005 Feb; 177(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 15666237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Digital radiography of the thorax with selenium detector. Clinical results and optimization potential of the technique]. Procacci C; Minniti S; Caumo F; Moore F; Ternullo S; Predicatori F; Locatelli F; Pistolesi GF Radiol Med; 1998 Nov; 96(5):446-53. PubMed ID: 10051867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Computed radiography versus mobile direct radiography for bedside chest radiographs: impact of dose on image quality and reader agreement. De Boo DW; Weber M; Deurloo EE; Streekstra GJ; Freling NJ; Dongelmans DA; Schaefer-Prokop CM Clin Radiol; 2011 Sep; 66(9):826-32. PubMed ID: 21570679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Physical image quality comparison of four types of digital detector for chest radiology. Fernandez JM; Ordiales JM; Guibelalde E; Prieto C; Vano E Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):140-3. PubMed ID: 18283060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Investigating the use of an antiscatter grid in chest radiography for average adults with a computed radiography imaging system. Moore CS; Wood TJ; Avery G; Balcam S; Needler L; Smith A; Saunderson JR; Beavis AW Br J Radiol; 2015 Mar; 88(1047):20140613. PubMed ID: 25571914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Experimental investigations for dose reduction by optimizing the radiation quality for digital mammography with an a-Se detector]. Schulz-Wendtland R; Hermann KP; Wenkel E; Böhner C; Lell M; Dassel MS; Bautz WA Rofo; 2007 May; 179(5):487-91. PubMed ID: 17436182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Dose reduction in high-resolution MSCT examinations of the chest for early detection of pneumonia in immunocompromised patients]. Yamamura J; Wildberger JE; Nagel HD; Dichtl D; Adam G; Wedegärtner U Rofo; 2009 Jun; 181(6):549-55. PubMed ID: 19306239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Radiation exposure and image quality in chest CT examinations. Ravenel JG; Scalzetti EM; Huda W; Garrisi W AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Aug; 177(2):279-84. PubMed ID: 11461845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The effect of different adaptation strengths on image quality and radiation dose using Siemens Care Dose 4D. Söderberg M; Gunnarsson M Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):173-9. PubMed ID: 20231163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Experiences with computed radiography: can we afford the cost? Bragg DG; Murray KA; Tripp D AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Oct; 169(4):935-41. PubMed ID: 9308439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Reducing the absorbed dose in analogue radiography of infant chest images by improving the image quality, using image processing techniques. Karimian A; Yazdani S; Askari MA Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):176-9. PubMed ID: 21743073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effective dose efficiency: an application-specific metric of quality and dose for digital radiography. Samei E; Ranger NT; Dobbins JT; Ravin CE Phys Med Biol; 2011 Aug; 56(16):5099-118. PubMed ID: 21775791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Digital pelvic radiography: increasing distance to reduce dose. Heath R; England A; Ward A; Charnock P; Ward M; Evans P; Harding L Radiol Technol; 2011; 83(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 21908777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Radiation dose reduction in a neonatal intensive care unit in computed radiography. Frayre AS; Torres P; Gaona E; Rivera T; Franco J; Molina N Appl Radiat Isot; 2012 Dec; 71 Suppl():57-60. PubMed ID: 22608982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Image quality assessment and radiation doses in intraoral radiography. Yakoumakis EN; Tierris CE; Stefanou EP; Phanourakis IG; Proukakis CC Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Mar; 91(3):362-8. PubMed ID: 11250637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The influence of different technique factors on image quality of chest radiographs as evaluated by modified CEC image quality criteria. Lanhede B; Båth M; Kheddache S; Sund P; Björneld L; Widell M; Almén A; Besjakov J; Mattsson S; Tingberg A; Herrmann C; Panzer W; Zankl M; Månsson LG Br J Radiol; 2002 Jan; 75(889):38-49. PubMed ID: 11806957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]