These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11432659)

  • 21. Elongation and preload stress in dental implant abutment screws.
    Haack JE; Sakaguchi RL; Sun T; Coffey JP
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(5):529-36. PubMed ID: 7590997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Screw joint stability after the application of retorque in implant-supported dentures under simulated masticatory conditions.
    Farina AP; Spazzin AO; Consani RL; Mesquita MF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jun; 111(6):499-504. PubMed ID: 24423456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparison of preload values in gold and titanium dental implant retaining screws.
    Doolabh R; Dullabh HD; Sykes LM
    SADJ; 2014 Aug; 69(7):316-20. PubMed ID: 26548212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mechanical behavior and failure analysis of prosthetic retaining screws after long-term use in vivo. Part 3: Preload and tensile fracture load testing.
    Al Jabbari YS; Fournelle R; Ziebert G; Toth J; Iacopino AM
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Apr; 17(3):192-200. PubMed ID: 18205737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Load fatigue performance of implant-ceramic abutment combinations.
    Nguyen HQ; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):636-46. PubMed ID: 19885403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Accuracy of mechanical torque devices for implants used in Brazilian dental offices.
    Santos GC; Passos SP; Coelho Santos MJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(1):38-9. PubMed ID: 21210000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Influence of the surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with a density equivalent to maxillary bone: a laboratory study.
    Tabassum A; Meijer GJ; Wolke JG; Jansen JA
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Apr; 20(4):327-32. PubMed ID: 19298286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The dynamic natures of implant loading.
    Wang RF; Kang B; Lang LA; Razzoog ME
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):359-71. PubMed ID: 19463663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Accuracy of friction-style and spring-style mechanical torque limiting devices for dental implants.
    Vallee MC; Conrad HJ; Basu S; Seong WJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Aug; 100(2):86-92. PubMed ID: 18672124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Axial displacement of abutments into implants and implant replicas, with the tapered cone-screw internal connection, as a function of tightening torque.
    Dailey B; Jordan L; Blind O; Tavernier B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):251-6. PubMed ID: 19492640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Primary stability of turned and acid-etched screw-type implants: a removal torque and histomorphometric study in rabbits.
    Fernandes Ede L; Unikowski IL; Teixeira ER; da Costa NP; Shinkai RS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):886-92. PubMed ID: 18271369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of the precision of fit between the Procera custom abutment and various implant systems.
    Lang LA; Sierraalta M; Hoffensperger M; Wang RF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):652-8. PubMed ID: 14579952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cyclic loading of implant-supported prostheses: changes in component fit over time.
    Hecker DM; Eckert SE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):346-51. PubMed ID: 12690346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of different tightening forces before laser welding to the implant/framework fit.
    da Silveira-Júnior CD; Neves FD; Fernandes-Neto AJ; Prado CJ; Simamoto-Júnior PC
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jun; 18(4):337-41. PubMed ID: 19210612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of a new method to achieve optimal passivity of implant-supported superstructures.
    Goossens IC; Herbst D
    SADJ; 2003 Aug; 58(7):279-85, 287. PubMed ID: 14649041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An in vitro analysis of implant screw torque loss with external hex and internal connection implant systems.
    Piermatti J; Yousef H; Luke A; Mahevich R; Weiner S
    Implant Dent; 2006 Dec; 15(4):427-35. PubMed ID: 17172962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of torque maintenance of abutment and cylinder screws with Morse taper implants.
    Ferreira MB; Delben JA; Barão VA; Faverani LP; Dos Santos PH; Assunção WG
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 23(6):e631-4. PubMed ID: 23172504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Dynamic fatigue resistance of implant-abutment junction in an internally notched morse-taper oral implant: influence of abutment design.
    Cehreli MC; Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H; Sahin S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 15248881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Load fatigue performance of four implant-abutment interface designs: effect of torque level and implant system.
    Quek HC; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):253-62. PubMed ID: 18548921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Implant abutment deformation during prosthetic cylinder screw tightening: an in vitro study.
    Neto RT; Moura MS; Souza EA; Rubo JH
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):391-5. PubMed ID: 19639078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.