152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11433259)
1. Italian public votes out anti-GMO Greens.
Meldolesi A
Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Jul; 19(7):603-4. PubMed ID: 11433259
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. New Zealand GMO incident highlights lack of standardized tests.
Norrie C
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Sep; 20(9):861. PubMed ID: 12205493
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Democratization is more than lower prices.
Cayford J
Science; 2003 Jul; 301(5630):167; author reply 167. PubMed ID: 12855789
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Italian GMO ban could spread.
Meldolesi A
Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Nov; 18(11):1137-8. PubMed ID: 11062425
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. New Zealand GMO debacle undermines green lobby.
Fletcher L
Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Apr; 19(4):292. PubMed ID: 11283556
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Biotechnology. Japanese controversies over transgenic crop regulation.
Watanabe KN; Taeb M; Okusu H
Science; 2004 Sep; 305(5690):1572. PubMed ID: 15361611
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Organic farmers sue GMO producers.
Bouchie A
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Mar; 20(3):210. PubMed ID: 11875406
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. New Zealand's compromise calms GMO lobby.
Norrie C
Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Dec; 19(12):1092. PubMed ID: 11731764
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Italy performs GMO trial about-face.
Meldolesi A
Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Apr; 19(4):293. PubMed ID: 11283557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Co-existence of agricultural production systems.
Jank B; Rath J; Gaugitsch H
Trends Biotechnol; 2006 May; 24(5):198-200. PubMed ID: 16545877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Drugs in crops--the unpalatable truth.
Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Feb; 22(2):133. PubMed ID: 14755274
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Biotechnology and the European public.
Gaskell G; Allum N; Bauer M; Durant J; Allansdottir A; Bonfadelli H; Boy D; de Cheveigné S; Fjaestad B; Gutteling JM; Hampel J; Jelsøe E; Jesuino JC; Kohring M; Kronberger N; Midden C; Nielsen TH; Przestalski A; Rusanen T; Sakellaris G; Torgersen H; Twardowski T; Wagner W
Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Sep; 18(9):935-8. PubMed ID: 10973210
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. GM crops: science, politics and communication.
Arntzen CJ; Coghlan A; Johnson B; Peacock J; Rodemeyer M
Nat Rev Genet; 2003 Oct; 4(10):839-43. PubMed ID: 14526380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. New Zealand backs GM technologies.
Norrie C
Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Sep; 19(9):792. PubMed ID: 11533620
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Fatal flaws in agbiotech regulatory policies.
McHughen A
Nat Biotechnol; 2007 Jul; 25(7):725-7. PubMed ID: 17621292
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Plant biotechnology. Italian scientists blast GMO restrictions.
Frank L
Science; 2000 Dec; 290(5499):2046. PubMed ID: 11187815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Terminator technology temporarily terminated.
Niiler E
Nat Biotechnol; 1999 Nov; 17(11):1054. PubMed ID: 10545899
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Genetic engineering: unnatural selection.
Snow A
Nature; 2003 Aug; 424(6949):619. PubMed ID: 12904767
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. How important is genetic engineering to European seed firms?
Arundel A; Hocke M; Tait J
Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Jun; 18(6):578. PubMed ID: 10835548
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Bringing policy relevance and scientific discipline to environmental risk assessment for genetically modified crops.
Herman RA; Garcia-Alonso M; Layton R; Raybould A
Trends Biotechnol; 2013 Sep; 31(9):493-6. PubMed ID: 23973171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
