These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11433259)
21. Follow my leader. Miller HI Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Dec; 19(12):1103. PubMed ID: 11731770 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Open season? Moses V Nat Biotechnol; 2007 Nov; 25(11):1213; discussion 1213. PubMed ID: 17989668 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The numerology of idiocy. Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Apr; 20(4):319. PubMed ID: 11923817 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Consumer acceptance of biotechnology and the role of second generation technologies in the USA and Europe. Lusk JL; Rozan A Trends Biotechnol; 2005 Aug; 23(8):386-7. PubMed ID: 15953650 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Left in the dust of the campaign trail. Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Nov; 18(11):1119. PubMed ID: 11062387 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. US agbio controversies continue. Fox JL Nat Biotechnol; 1999 Jul; 17(7):628. PubMed ID: 10409343 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Auf Wiedersehen, agbiotech. Miller HI Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Sep; 26(9):974-5. PubMed ID: 18779798 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. China. Activists go on warpath against transgenic crops--and scientists. Stone R Science; 2011 Feb; 331(6020):1000-1. PubMed ID: 21350138 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Genetically modified crops. Safety research falls foul of German politics. Vogel G Science; 2005 Mar; 307(5716):1706. PubMed ID: 15774731 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Plant biotechnology in German media: A linguistic analysis of the public image of genetically modified organisms. Müller M; Freitag B; Köder F Biotechnol J; 2010 Jun; 5(6):541-4. PubMed ID: 20518055 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Canada. Monsanto wins split decision in patent fight over GM crop. Kondro W Science; 2004 May; 304(5675):1229. PubMed ID: 15166338 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. European Union in disarray over GM seeds. Meldolesi A Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Apr; 20(4):324-5. PubMed ID: 11923823 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Regulating innovative crop technologies in Canada: the case of regulating genetically modified crops. Smyth S; McHughen A Plant Biotechnol J; 2008 Apr; 6(3):213-25. PubMed ID: 18028290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Report recommends ban of US GM maize in Mexico. Fox JL Nat Biotechnol; 2005 Jan; 23(1):6. PubMed ID: 15637599 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. UNEP "buys support for Cartagena," say critics. Hodgson J Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Mar; 20(3):205. PubMed ID: 11875401 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. NAS asks for more scrutiny of GM crops. Stokstad E Science; 2002 Mar; 295(5560):1619-20. PubMed ID: 11872806 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]