These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11433626)

  • 1. Patient satisfaction measurement strategies: a comparison of phone and mail methods.
    Burroughs TE; Waterman BM; Cira JC; Desikan R; Claiborne Dunagan W
    Jt Comm J Qual Improv; 2001 Jul; 27(7):349-61. PubMed ID: 11433626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing inner-city patients' hospital experiences. A controlled trial of telephone interviews versus mailed surveys.
    Harris LE; Weinberger M; Tierney WM
    Med Care; 1997 Jan; 35(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 8998204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A randomized experiment investigating the suitability of speech-enabled IVR and Web modes for publicly reported surveys of patients' experience of hospital care.
    Elliott MN; Brown JA; Lehrman WG; Beckett MK; Hambarsoomian K; Giordano LA; Goldstein EH
    Med Care Res Rev; 2013 Apr; 70(2):165-84. PubMed ID: 23132892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of phone versus mail survey methods on the measurement of health-related quality of life and emotional and behavioural problems in adolescents.
    Erhart M; Wetzel RM; Krügel A; Ravens-Sieberer U
    BMC Public Health; 2009 Dec; 9():491. PubMed ID: 20042099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prospective comparison of endoscopy patient satisfaction surveys: e-mail versus standard mail versus telephone.
    Harewood GC; Yacavone RF; Locke GR; Wiersema MJ
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Dec; 96(12):3312-7. PubMed ID: 11774942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of a postal survey and mixed-mode survey using a questionnaire on patients' experiences with breast care.
    Zuidgeest M; Hendriks M; Koopman L; Spreeuwenberg P; Rademakers J
    J Med Internet Res; 2011 Sep; 13(3):e68. PubMed ID: 21946048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of mail and telephone in assessing patient experiences in receiving care from medical group practices.
    Hepner KA; Brown JA; Hays RD
    Eval Health Prof; 2005 Dec; 28(4):377-89. PubMed ID: 16272420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Utility of Web-based assessment of patient satisfaction with endoscopy.
    Harewood GC; Wiersema MJ; de Groen PC
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2003 May; 98(5):1016-21. PubMed ID: 12809822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing telephone and mail responses to the CAHPS survey instrument. Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study.
    Fowler FJ; Gallagher PM; Nederend S
    Med Care; 1999 Mar; 37(3 Suppl):MS41-9. PubMed ID: 10098558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using telephone interviews to reduce nonresponse bias to mail surveys of health plan members.
    Fowler FJ; Gallagher PM; Stringfellow VL; Zaslavsky AM; Thompson JW; Cleary PD
    Med Care; 2002 Mar; 40(3):190-200. PubMed ID: 11880792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do on-site patient satisfaction surveys bias results?
    Burroughs TE; Waterman BM; Gilin D; Adams D; McCollegan J; Cira J
    Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf; 2005 Mar; 31(3):158-66. PubMed ID: 15828599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of follow-up methodology and completeness on apparent clinical outcome of fundoplication.
    Ludemann R; Watson DI; Jamieson GG
    Am J Surg; 2003 Aug; 186(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 12885606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of administration mode on CAHPS survey response rates and results: A comparison of mail and web-based approaches.
    Fowler FJ; Cosenza C; Cripps LA; Edgman-Levitan S; Cleary PD
    Health Serv Res; 2019 Jun; 54(3):714-721. PubMed ID: 30656646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Why do people report better health by phone than by mail?
    Brewer NT; Hallman WK; Fiedler N; Kipen HM
    Med Care; 2004 Sep; 42(9):875-83. PubMed ID: 15319613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surveying minorities with limited-English proficiency: does data collection method affect data quality among Asian Americans?
    Ngo-Metzger Q; Kaplan SH; Sorkin DH; Clarridge BR; Phillips RS
    Med Care; 2004 Sep; 42(9):893-900. PubMed ID: 15319615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of patient satisfaction with telephone and mail interventions provided by a clinical pharmacy cardiac risk reduction service.
    Holsclaw SL; Olson KL; Hornak R; Denham AM
    J Manag Care Pharm; 2005 Jun; 11(5):403-9. PubMed ID: 15934799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Evaluation of inpatient satisfaction. Comparison of different survey methods].
    Labarère J; François P; Bertrand D; Fourny M; Olive F; Peyrin JC
    Presse Med; 2000 Jun; 29(20):1112-4. PubMed ID: 10901785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing the Effects of Participant Preference and Demographics in the Usage of Web-based Survey Questionnaires by Women Attending Screening Mammography in British Columbia.
    Mlikotic R; Parker B; Rajapakshe R
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 Mar; 18(3):e70. PubMed ID: 27005707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Patient satisfaction or acquiescence? Comparing mail and telephone survey results.
    Hall MF
    J Health Care Mark; 1995; 15(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 10142388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Equivalence of mail and telephone responses to the CAHPS Hospital Survey.
    de Vries H; Elliott MN; Hepner KA; Keller SD; Hays RD
    Health Serv Res; 2005 Dec; 40(6 Pt 2):2120-39. PubMed ID: 16316441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.