These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11433648)
21. Nat Hentoff on the babies Doe. McFadden JP; Hentoff N Hum Life Rev; 1984; 10(2):73-104. PubMed ID: 11651744 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Medicating committed psychiatric patients over their objections: balancing patients' interests and quality of mental health care. Hacker G Rutgers Law J; 1983; 14(3):685-739. PubMed ID: 11658759 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Ethics committees: group process concerns and the need for research. Hayes GJ Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1995; 4(1):83-91. PubMed ID: 7627372 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Minors and health care decisions: broadening the scope. Frader J Bioethics Forum; 1995; 11(4):13-6. PubMed ID: 11654285 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The views of the judiciary regarding life-sustaining medical treatment decisions. Hafemeister TL; Robinson DM Law Psychol Rev; 1994; 18():189-246. PubMed ID: 16523577 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Withdrawing treatment for the "wrong" reasons. Baumrucker SJ; Sheldon JE; Morris GM; Stolick M; Carter GT; Harrington D Am J Hosp Palliat Care; 2007 Dec-2008 Jan; 24(6):509-14. PubMed ID: 18182638 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Education of ethics committees. Thomasma DC Bioethics Forum; 1994; 10(4):12-8. PubMed ID: 11652873 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Disabling the pacemaker: the heart-rending decision every competent patient has a right to make. Manganello TD Health Care Law Mon; 2000 Jan; ():3-15. PubMed ID: 10788043 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The precarious role of the courts: surrogate health care decisionmaking. Fader JF MD Law Rev; 1994; 53(4):1193-219. PubMed ID: 12599351 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Research in critically ill patients. Lackner FX Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl; 1997; 111():160-2. PubMed ID: 9420996 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Futility, conscientious refusal, and who gets to decide. Davis JK J Med Philos; 2008 Aug; 33(4):356-73. PubMed ID: 18662950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Ethics committees and due process: nesting rights in a community of caring. Wolf SM MD Law Rev; 1991; 50(3):798-858. PubMed ID: 11651207 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The right of a minor in Israel to participate in the decision-making process concerning his or her medical treatment. Kaplan YS Fordham Int Law J; 2002 Jun; 25(5):1085-168. PubMed ID: 15212068 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Right to refuse life sustaining medical treatment and the noncompetent nonterminally ill patient: an analysis of abridgment and anarchy. Adamson EH Pepperdine Law Rev; 1990; 17(2):461-92. PubMed ID: 16047420 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The right to die: medico-legal implications of In re Quinlan. Hirsh HL; Donovan RE Rutgers Law Rev; 1977; 30(2):267-303. PubMed ID: 11661462 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Legal and civil rights of persons involuntarily detained. Effective 1974. California Wests Annot Calif Codes Calif; 1974; Article 7 Sections 5325-5328.9():. PubMed ID: 12041476 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Of triage, bean counting, advocacy, and ethical conflict at end-of-life. Szalados JE Crit Care Med; 2008 Jul; 36(7):2202-3. PubMed ID: 18594232 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]