BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11434112)

  • 1. Physical diagnosis and the technological imperative.
    Bryan CS
    J S C Med Assoc; 2001 Jun; 97(6):259-61. PubMed ID: 11434112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Daring to practice low-cost medicine in a high-tech era.
    Palfrey S
    N Engl J Med; 2011 Mar; 364(11):e21. PubMed ID: 21366468
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The uncritical use of high-tech medical imaging.
    Hillman BJ; Goldsmith JC
    N Engl J Med; 2010 Jul; 363(1):4-6. PubMed ID: 20573920
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Don't let high-tech tests beget low-quality care.
    Trobe JD
    Med Econ; 1988 Mar; 65(6):88-9, 93-5, 99 passim. PubMed ID: 10286466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Three barriers to innovative diagnostics.
    Billings PR
    Nat Biotechnol; 2006 Aug; 24(8):917-8. PubMed ID: 16900129
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Enhancing practice efficiency by examining patterns of care: top ten lists data mined from a private pediatric practice.
    Copenhaver J; Webster C
    J Med Pract Manage; 2001; 17(2):109-11. PubMed ID: 11680135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Doc, shouldn't we be getting some tests?
    Loprinzi CL; Hayes D; Smith T
    J Clin Oncol; 2003 May; 21(9 Suppl):108s-111s. PubMed ID: 12743213
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Health plans join up for the genomics revolution.
    Carroll J
    Manag Care; 2009 Feb; 18(2):21-2, 24-5. PubMed ID: 19264022
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Beware of technological imperatives and commercial interests that prevent best practices!
    Benner P
    Am J Crit Care; 2003 Sep; 12(5):469-71. PubMed ID: 14503431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Getting at the facts on imaging utilization growth.
    Moser JW
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Sep; 2(9):720-4. PubMed ID: 17411917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative effectiveness research.
    Demaria AN
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2009 Mar; 53(11):973-5. PubMed ID: 19281929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Invited commentary: making a difference in quality.
    Rhodes RS
    Surgery; 2001 Feb; 129(2):143-5. PubMed ID: 11174705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost awareness among Swedish physicians working at the emergency department.
    Schilling UM
    Eur J Emerg Med; 2009 Jun; 16(3):131-4. PubMed ID: 19282761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [A misleading panacea?].
    Junod AF
    Rev Med Suisse; 2006 Jan; 2(47):74. PubMed ID: 16465951
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The complete physical.
    Rathe R
    Am Fam Physician; 2003 Oct; 68(7):1439, 1443-4. PubMed ID: 14567495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. E-prescribing: why the fuss?
    Adler KG
    Fam Pract Manag; 2009; 16(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 19186736
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Teaching clinic lowers pharmacy costs. How to achieve more cost-effective prescribing.
    Patmas MA; O'Kane NJ; Reitzenstein J
    Physician Exec; 2003; 29(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 12555724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How physicians react to cost-effectiveness information.
    Asch DA
    LDI Issue Brief; 2003; 8(9):1-4. PubMed ID: 12956120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Physical diagnosis versus modern technology. A review.
    Fitzgerald FT
    West J Med; 1990 Apr; 152(4):377-82. PubMed ID: 2190412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Disease-specific drug education programs hit their target.
    Clin Resour Manag; 2002 May; 3(5):70-3, 76-7. PubMed ID: 12048769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.