322 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11434827)
1. Evaluation of decision rules for referring women for bone densitometry by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.
Cadarette SM; Jaglal SB; Murray TM; McIsaac WJ; Joseph L; Brown JP;
JAMA; 2001 Jul; 286(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 11434827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of decision rules for identifying low bone density in postmenopausal African-American women.
Wallace LS; Ballard JE; Holiday D; Turner LW; Keenum AJ; Pearman CM
J Natl Med Assoc; 2004 Mar; 96(3):290-6. PubMed ID: 15040510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The validity of decision rules for selecting women with primary osteoporosis for bone mineral density testing.
Cadarette SM; McIsaac WJ; Hawker GA; Jaakkimainen L; Culbert A; Zarifa G; Ola E; Jaglal SB
Osteoporos Int; 2004 May; 15(5):361-6. PubMed ID: 14730421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development and validation of the osteoporosis prescreening risk assessment (OPERA) tool to facilitate identification of women likely to have low bone density.
Salaffi F; Silveri F; Stancati A; Grassi W
Clin Rheumatol; 2005 Jun; 24(3):203-11. PubMed ID: 15549501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of Different Screening Tools for Predicting Femoral Neck Osteoporosis in Rural South Indian Postmenopausal Women.
Cherian KE; Kapoor N; Shetty S; Naik D; Thomas N; Paul TV
J Clin Densitom; 2018; 21(1):119-124. PubMed ID: 28958825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of the simple calculated osteoporosis risk estimation (SCORE) for patient selection for bone densitometry.
Cadarette SM; Jaglal SB; Murray TM
Osteoporos Int; 1999; 10(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 10501785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development and validation of the Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument to facilitate selection of women for bone densitometry.
Cadarette SM; Jaglal SB; Kreiger N; McIsaac WJ; Darlington GA; Tu JV
CMAJ; 2000 May; 162(9):1289-94. PubMed ID: 10813010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the simple calculated osteoporosis risk estimation (SCORE) in older Caucasian women: the Rancho Bernardo study.
Von Mühlen D; Visby Lunde A; Barrett-Connor E; Bettencourt R
Osteoporos Int; 1999; 10(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 10501784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Decision rules for selecting women for bone mineral density testing: application in postmenopausal women referred to a bone densitometry unit.
Martínez-Aguilà D; Gómez-Vaquero C; Rozadilla A; Romera M; Narváez J; Nolla JM
J Rheumatol; 2007 Jun; 34(6):1307-12. PubMed ID: 17552058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparisons of Different Screening Tools for Identifying Fracture/Osteoporosis Risk Among Community-Dwelling Older People.
Chen SJ; Chen YJ; Cheng CH; Hwang HF; Chen CY; Lin MR
Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 May; 95(20):e3415. PubMed ID: 27196447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Phalangeal densitometry compared with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry for assessment of bone mineral density in elderly women.
Dhainaut A; Rohde G; Hoff M; Syversen U; Haugeberg G
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2011 Dec; 20(12):1789-95. PubMed ID: 21970521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparative study of computed digital absorptiometry and conventional dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in postmenopausal women.
Fiter J; Nolla JM; Gómez-Vaquero C; Martínez-Aguilá D; Valverde J; Roig-Escofet D
Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(7):565-9. PubMed ID: 11527054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact on the population of different bone mineral density testing criteria and appropriateness of densitometries in the ESOSVAL cohort, Spain.
Hurtado I; Sanfélix-Gimeno G; Baixauli-Pérez C; Peiró S; Sanfélix-Genovés J
J Clin Endocrinol Metab; 2014 Jan; 99(1):142-50. PubMed ID: 24384018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Selection of women aged 50-64 yr for bone density measurement.
Leslie WD; Lix LM; Johansson H; Oden A; McCloskey E; Kanis JA;
J Clin Densitom; 2013; 16(4):570-8. PubMed ID: 23452870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of clinical prediction rules in detecting osteoporosis in a population-based sample of postmenopausal women.
Mauck KF; Cuddihy MT; Atkinson EJ; Melton LJ
Arch Intern Med; 2005 Mar; 165(5):530-6. PubMed ID: 15767529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Postmenopausal bone density referral decision rules: correlation with clinical fractures.
Wei GS; Jackson JL
Mil Med; 2004 Dec; 169(12):1000-4. PubMed ID: 15646195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Proximal Femur Hounsfield Units on CT Colonoscopy Correlate With Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry.
Christensen DL; Nappo KE; Wolfe JA; Wade SM; Brooks DI; Potter BK; Forsberg JA; Tintle SM
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Apr; 477(4):850-860. PubMed ID: 30811362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development and Validation of an Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Taiwan (OSTAi) Postmenopausal Women-A Sub-Study of the Taiwan OsteoPorosis Survey (TOPS).
Su FM; Liu DH; Chen JF; Yu SF; Chiu WC; Hsu CY; Ko CH; Tsai CC; Cheng TT
PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0130716. PubMed ID: 26086766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The utility of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, calcaneal quantitative ultrasound, and fracture risk indices (FRAX® and Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument) for the identification of women with distal forearm or hip fractures: A pilot study.
Esmaeilzadeh S; Cesme F; Oral A; Yaliman A; Sindel D
Endocr Res; 2016 Aug; 41(3):248-60. PubMed ID: 26864472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interest of a prescreening questionnaire to reduce the cost of bone densitometry.
Ben Sedrine W; Broers P; Devogelaer JP; Depresseux G; Kaufman JM; Goemaere S; Reginster JY
Osteoporos Int; 2002 May; 13(5):434-42. PubMed ID: 12086356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
