168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11435822)
1. Reevaluation of the 1997 TNM classification for renal cell carcinoma: T1 and T2 cutoff point at 4.5 rather than 7 cm. better correlates with clinical outcome.
Zisman A; Pantuck AJ; Chao D; Dorey F; Said JW; Gitlitz BJ; de Kernion JB; Figlin RA; Belldegrun AS
J Urol; 2001 Jul; 166(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 11435822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prognostic significance of the 1997 TNM classification of renal cell carcinoma.
Javidan J; Stricker HJ; Tamboli P; Amin MB; Peabody JO; Deshpande A; Menon M; Amin MB
J Urol; 1999 Oct; 162(4):1277-81. PubMed ID: 10492179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reassessment of the 1997 TNM classification system for renal cell carcinoma.
Elmore JM; Kadesky KT; Koeneman KS; Sagalowsky AI
Cancer; 2003 Dec; 98(11):2329-34. PubMed ID: 14635066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of tumor size on the clinical outcomes of patients with Robson State I renal cell carcinoma.
Kinouchi T; Saiki S; Meguro N; Maeda O; Kuroda M; Usami M; Kotake T
Cancer; 1999 Feb; 85(3):689-95. PubMed ID: 10091742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of a 4 cm. cutoff point for stratification of T1N0M0 renal cell carcinoma after radical nephrectomy.
Igarashi T; Tobe T; Nakatsu HO; Suzuki N; Murakami S; Hamano M; Maruoka M; Nagayama T; Matsuzaki O; Ito H
J Urol; 2001 Apr; 165(4):1103-6. PubMed ID: 11257647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Modified cancer TNM classification for localized renal cell carcinoma based on the prognostic analysis of 3748 cases from a single center.
Zhang J; Li X; Lin J; Liu Z; Tian Y; Wang Q
Can J Physiol Pharmacol; 2022 Jan; 100(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 34779659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prognostic impact of tumor size on pT2 renal cell carcinoma: an international multicenter experience.
Klatte T; Patard JJ; Goel RH; Kleid MD; Guille F; Lobel B; Abbou CC; De La Taille A; Tostain J; Cindolo L; Altieri V; Ficarra V; Artibani W; Prayer-Galetti T; Allhoff EP; Schips L; Zigeuner R; Figlin RA; Kabbinavar FF; Pantuck AJ; Belldegrun AS; Lam JS
J Urol; 2007 Jul; 178(1):35-40; discussion 40. PubMed ID: 17521678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. New cut-off point between T1 and T2 renal cell carcinoma - necessary for a better discriminatory power of the TNM classification.
Wunderlich H; Dreihaupt M; Schlichter A; Kosmehl H; Reichelt O; Schubert J
Urol Int; 2004; 72(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 14963352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reevaluation of TNM staging of renal cortical tumors: recurrence and survival for T1N0M0 and T3aN0M0 tumors are equivalent.
Gilbert SM; Murphy AM; Katz AE; Goluboff ET; Sawczuk IS; Olsson CA; Benson MC; McKiernan JM
Urology; 2006 Aug; 68(2):287-91. PubMed ID: 16904438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Current TNM classification of renal cell carcinoma evaluated: revising stage T3a.
Siemer S; Lehmann J; Loch A; Becker F; Stein U; Schneider G; Ziegler M; Stöckle M
J Urol; 2005 Jan; 173(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 15592020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of tumor size on the long-term survival of patients with early stage renal cell cancer.
Kuczyk M; Wegener G; Merseburger AS; Anastasiadis A; Machtens S; Zumbrägel A; Hartmann JT; Bokemeyer C; Jonas U; Stenzl A
World J Urol; 2005 Feb; 23(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 15729558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prognostic indicators for renal cell carcinoma: a multivariate analysis of 643 patients using the revised 1997 TNM staging criteria.
Tsui KH; Shvarts O; Smith RB; Figlin RA; deKernion JB; Belldegrun A
J Urol; 2000 Apr; 163(4):1090-5; quiz 1295. PubMed ID: 10737472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prognostic stratification of localized renal cell carcinoma by tumor size.
Bedke J; Pritsch M; Buse S; Jakobi H; Elsaesser KH; Pahernik S; Haferkamp A; Hohenfellner M
J Urol; 2008 Jul; 180(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 18485376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prognostic significance of tumour size in patients after tumour nephrectomy for localised renal cell carcinoma.
Steiner T; Knels R; Schubert J
Eur Urol; 2004 Sep; 46(3):327-30. PubMed ID: 15306102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficacy of nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma: analysis based on the new 1997 tumor-node-metastasis staging system.
Belldegrun A; Tsui KH; deKernion JB; Smith RB
J Clin Oncol; 1999 Sep; 17(9):2868-75. PubMed ID: 10561364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stage pT1 renal cell carcinoma: review of the prognostic significance of size.
Zucchi A; Mearini L; Mearini E; Costantini E
Urol Int; 2003; 70(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 12566815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does stage T3a renal cell carcinoma embrace a homogeneous group of patients?
Gofrit ON; Shapiro A; Pizov G; Landau EH; Katz R; Zorn KC; Pode D
J Urol; 2007 May; 177(5):1682-6. PubMed ID: 17437782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Preoperative prognostic nomogram (probability table) for renal cell carcinoma based on TNM classification.
Kanao K; Mizuno R; Kikuchi E; Miyajima A; Nakagawa K; Ohigashi T; Nakashima J; Oya M
J Urol; 2009 Feb; 181(2):480-5; discussion 485. PubMed ID: 19100568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pathologic staging of renal cell carcinoma: significance of tumor classification with the 1997 TNM staging system.
Gettman MT; Blute ML; Spotts B; Bryant SC; Zincke H
Cancer; 2001 Jan; 91(2):354-61. PubMed ID: 11180082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Outcome of isolated renal cell carcinoma fossa recurrence after nephrectomy.
Itano NB; Blute ML; Spotts B; Zincke H
J Urol; 2000 Aug; 164(2):322-5. PubMed ID: 10893575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
