259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11436731)
41. Object-based control of attention is sensitive to recent experience.
Lee H; Mozer MC; Kramer AF; Vecera SP
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):314-25. PubMed ID: 21967274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Inhibition of return and action affordances.
Morgan HM; Tipper SP
Exp Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 173(1):49-61. PubMed ID: 16491408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Cortical expressions of inhibition of return.
Prime DJ; Ward LM
Brain Res; 2006 Feb; 1072(1):161-74. PubMed ID: 16445889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Movement versus focusing of visual attention.
Shepherd M; Müller HJ
Percept Psychophys; 1989 Aug; 46(2):146-54. PubMed ID: 2762102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Eye gaze versus arrows as spatial cues: two qualitatively different modes of attentional selection.
Marotta A; Lupiáñez J; Martella D; Casagrande M
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):326-35. PubMed ID: 21688940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Facilitation and inhibition mechanisms of human visuospatial attention in a non-search task.
Facoetti A
Neurosci Lett; 2001 Jan; 298(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 11154832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Inhibition of return and attentional control settings.
Gibson BS; Amelio J
Percept Psychophys; 2000 Apr; 62(3):496-504. PubMed ID: 10909240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Orienting of attention without awareness is affected by measurement-induced attentional control settings.
Ivanoff J; Klein RM
J Vis; 2003; 3(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 12678623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Attentional spreading in object-based attention.
Richard AM; Lee H; Vecera SP
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):842-53. PubMed ID: 18665730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Age-related differences in object- and location-based inhibition of return of attention.
McCrae CS; Abrams RA
Psychol Aging; 2001 Sep; 16(3):437-49. PubMed ID: 11554522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. An apparent-motion confound causes the negative exogenous cuing effect at SOAs with larger numbers of target locations.
Chen P; Mordkoff JT
Am J Psychol; 2012; 125(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 22428426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Reflexive orienting to gaze is not luminance dependent.
Laidlaw KE; Pratt J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Jan; 72(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 20045878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Inhibition of return for the length of a line?
Francis L; Milliken B
Percept Psychophys; 2003 Nov; 65(8):1208-21. PubMed ID: 14710956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Neural networks underlying endogenous and exogenous visual-spatial orienting.
Mayer AR; Dorflinger JM; Rao SM; Seidenberg M
Neuroimage; 2004 Oct; 23(2):534-41. PubMed ID: 15488402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. The cued recognition task: dissociating the abrupt onset effect from the social and arrow cueing effect.
Xu B; Tanaka JW
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jan; 77(1):97-110. PubMed ID: 25190323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. A short-lived face alert during inhibition of return.
Weaver MD; Aronsen D; Lauwereyns J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Apr; 74(3):510-20. PubMed ID: 22205613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Why does the effect of short-SOA exogenous cuing on simple RT depend on the number of display locations?
Mordkoff JT; Halterman R; Chen P
Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Aug; 15(4):819-24. PubMed ID: 18792510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Capturing attention is not that simple: different mechanisms for stimulus-driven and contingent capture.
Liao HI; Yeh SL
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Nov; 75(8):1703-14. PubMed ID: 24037596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Different effects of exogenous cues in a visual detection and discrimination task: delayed attention withdrawal and/or speeded motor inhibition?
Van der Lubbe RH; Vogel RO; Postma A
J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1829-40. PubMed ID: 16356322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Spatial attention triggered by unimodal, crossmodal, and bimodal exogenous cues: a comparison of reflexive orienting mechanisms.
Santangelo V; Van der Lubbe RH; Belardinelli MO; Postma A
Exp Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 173(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 16489435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
