228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11437421)
1. Effect of the angle of the screw on the stability of the mandibular sagittal split ramus osteotomy: a study in sheep mandibles.
Uckan S; Schwimmer A; Kummer F; Greenberg AM
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Aug; 39(4):266-8. PubMed ID: 11437421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro biomechanical evaluation of the use of conventional and locking miniplate/screw systems for sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Ribeiro-Junior PD; Magro-Filho O; Shastri KA; Papageorge MB
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Apr; 68(4):724-30. PubMed ID: 19962812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of stability of absorbable and titanium plate and screw fixation for sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Dolanmaz D; Uckan S; Isik K; Saglam H
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Apr; 42(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 15013544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An in vitro comparison of an adjustable bone fixation system.
Van Sickels JE; Peterson GP; Holms S; Haug RH
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Nov; 63(11):1620-5. PubMed ID: 16243179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro comparison of biomechanical characteristics of sagittal split osteotomy fixation techniques.
Ozden B; Alkan A; Arici S; Erdem E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Sep; 35(9):837-41. PubMed ID: 16687240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of stability of 2.0 mm standard and 2.0 mm locking miniplate/screws for the fixation of sagittal split ramus osteotomy on sheep mandibles.
Oguz Y; Saglam H; Dolanmaz D; Uckan S
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 49(2):135-7. PubMed ID: 20226575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: advancement surgery.
Brasileiro BF; Grempel RG; Ambrosano GM; Passeri LA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):809-17. PubMed ID: 19304039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Stability of screw fixation following sagittal splitting osteotomy of the mandibular ramus].
Eba M
Meikai Daigaku Shigaku Zasshi; 1990; 19(3):356-76. PubMed ID: 2134896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative biomechanical and photoelastic evaluation of different fixation techniques of sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular advancement.
Sato FR; Asprino L; Consani S; de Moraes M
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jan; 68(1):160-6. PubMed ID: 20006171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Immediate mechanical stability of sagittal split ramus osteotomy fixed with resorbable compared with titanium bicortical screws in mandibles of sheep.
Cilasun U; Uckan S; Dolanmaz D; Saglam H
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Dec; 44(6):534-7. PubMed ID: 16423434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-dimensional finite element analysis used to compare methods of fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy: setback surgery-posterior loading.
Erkmen E; Simşek B; Yücel E; Kurt A
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Apr; 43(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 15749208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of stress distribution on fixation of bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy with resorbable plates and screws using the finite-element method.
Sarkarat F; Motamedi MH; Bohluli B; Moharamnejad N; Ansari S; Shahabi-Sirjani H
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jun; 70(6):1434-8. PubMed ID: 21820783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lag screw versus position screw techniques for rigid internal fixation of sagittal osteotomies: a comparison of stability.
Watzke IM; Tucker MR; Turvey TA
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1991; 6(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 1940536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro comparison of 1.5 mm vs. 2.0 mm screws for fixation in the sagittal split osteotomy.
Scaf de Molon R; de Ávila ÉD; Scartezini GR; Bonini Campos JA; Vaz LG; Real Gabrielli MF; Pereira Filho VA
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2011 Dec; 39(8):574-7. PubMed ID: 21227709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro comparison of screw versus plate fixation in the sagittal split osteotomy.
Foley WL; Beckman TW
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1992; 7(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 1291608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fixation of bimaxillary osteotomies with resorbable plates and screws: experience in 20 consecutive cases.
Edwards RC; Kiely KD; Eppley BL
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Mar; 59(3):271-6. PubMed ID: 11243608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stability of locking and conventional 2.0-mm miniplate/screw systems after sagittal split ramus osteotomy: finite element analysis.
Oguz Y; Uckan S; Ozden AU; Uckan E; Eser A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Aug; 108(2):174-7. PubMed ID: 19615655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stability of skeletal Class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures.
Costa F; Robiony M; Sembronio S; Polini F; Politi M
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001; 16(3):179-92. PubMed ID: 12387609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The use of an intermaxillary fixation screw for mandibular setback surgery.
Ueki K; Marukawa K; Shimada M; Nakagawa K; Yamamoto E
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Aug; 65(8):1562-8. PubMed ID: 17656284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Modification of the sagittal split osteotomy of the mandibular ramus: mobilizing vertical osteotomy of the internal ramus segment.
Ricard D; Ferri J
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1691-9. PubMed ID: 19615584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
