These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11438107)
1. Schooling affects the feeding success of Australian salmon (Arripis trutta) when preying on mysid swarms (Paramesopodopsis rufa). Foster EG; Ritz DA; Osborn JE; Swadling KM J Exp Mar Biol Ecol; 2001 Jun; 261(1):93-106. PubMed ID: 11438107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fish farms, parasites, and predators: implications for salmon population dynamics. Krkosek M; Connors BM; Ford H; Peacock S; Mages P; Ford JS; Morton A; Volpe JP; Hilborn R; Dill LM; Lewis MA Ecol Appl; 2011 Apr; 21(3):897-914. PubMed ID: 21639053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How to capture fish in a school? Effect of successive predator attacks on seabird feeding success. Thiebault A; Semeria M; Lett C; Tremblay Y J Anim Ecol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):157-67. PubMed ID: 26768335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Facilitation and Dominance in a Schooling Predator: Foraging Behavior of Florida Pompano, Trachinotus carolinus. Schrandt MN; Powers SP PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0130095. PubMed ID: 26068114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Satiation-dependent, intra-cohort variations in prey size selection of young roach (Rutilus rutilus). Mikheev VN; Wanzenböck J Oecologia; 1999 Dec; 121(4):499-505. PubMed ID: 28308359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of prey density on predators: conspicuousness and attack success are sensitive to spatial scale. Ioannou CC; Morrell LJ; Ruxton GD; Krause J Am Nat; 2009 Apr; 173(4):499-506. PubMed ID: 19231967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multi-predator assemblages, dive type, bathymetry and sex influence foraging success and efficiency in African penguins. Sutton G; Pichegru L; Botha JA; Kouzani AZ; Adams S; Bost CA; Arnould JPY PeerJ; 2020; 8():e9380. PubMed ID: 32655991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differences in prey selection and behaviour during self-feeding and chick provisioning in rhinoceros auklets. Davoren GK; Burger AE Anim Behav; 1999 Oct; 58(4):853-863. PubMed ID: 10512659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differential fitness returns in relation to spatial position in groups. Krause J Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 1994 May; 69(2):187-206. PubMed ID: 8054444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Benefits of Group Foraging Depend on Prey Type in a Small Marine Predator, the Little Penguin. Sutton GJ; Hoskins AJ; Arnould JP PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0144297. PubMed ID: 26674073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Individual-based energetic model suggests bottom up mechanisms for the impact of coastal hypoxia on Pacific harbor seal (Phoca vitulina richardii) foraging behavior. Steingass S; Horning M J Theor Biol; 2017 Mar; 416():190-198. PubMed ID: 28082128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of light on the feeding rates of pelagic and littoral mysid shrimps: a trade-off between feeding success and predation avoidance. Viherluoto M; Viitasalo M J Exp Mar Biol Ecol; 2001 Jul; 261(2):237-244. PubMed ID: 11399278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Behavioral and energetic costs of group membership in a coral reef fish. White JW; Warner RR Oecologia; 2007 Nov; 154(2):423-33. PubMed ID: 17713786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predator bioenergetics and the prey size spectrum: do foraging costs determine fish production? Giacomini HC; Shuter BJ; Lester NP J Theor Biol; 2013 Sep; 332():249-60. PubMed ID: 23685066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Turbidity interferes with foraging success of visual but not chemosensory predators. Lunt J; Smee DL PeerJ; 2015; 3():e1212. PubMed ID: 26401444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Eye fluke (Tylodelphys clavata) infection impairs visual ability and hampers foraging success in European perch. Vivas Muñoz JC; Bierbach D; Knopf K Parasitol Res; 2019 Sep; 118(9):2531-2541. PubMed ID: 31286263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The scaling of locomotor performance in predator-prey encounters: from fish to killer whales. Domenici P Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol; 2001 Dec; 131(1):169-82. PubMed ID: 11733175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Experience and social environment influence the ability of young brown trout to forage on live novel prey. Sundström LF; Johnsson JI Anim Behav; 2001 Jan; 61(1):249-255. PubMed ID: 11170714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of bottom trawling on fish foraging and feeding. Johnson AF; Gorelli G; Jenkins SR; Hiddink JG; Hinz H Proc Biol Sci; 2015 Jan; 282(1799):20142336. PubMed ID: 25621336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Changing handling times during feeding and consequences for prey size selection of 0+ zooplanktivorous fish. Wanzenböck J Oecologia; 1995 Nov; 104(3):372-378. PubMed ID: 28307594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]