351 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11438340)
1. Intrauterine insemination-ready versus conventional semen cryopreservation for donor insemination: a comparison of retrospective results and a prospective, randomized trial.
Wolf DP; Patton PE; Burry KA; Kaplan PF
Fertil Steril; 2001 Jul; 76(1):181-5. PubMed ID: 11438340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intrauterine insemination or intracervical insemination with cryopreserved donor sperm in the natural cycle: a cohort study.
Kop PA; van Wely M; Mol BW; de Melker AA; Janssens PM; Arends B; Curfs MH; Kortman M; Nap A; Rijnders E; Roovers JP; Ruis H; Simons AH; Repping S; van der Veen F; Mochtar MH
Hum Reprod; 2015 Mar; 30(3):603-7. PubMed ID: 25637621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A prospective randomized study of pregnancy rates following intrauterine and intracervical insemination using frozen donor sperm.
Byrd W; Bradshaw K; Carr B; Edman C; Odom J; Ackerman G
Fertil Steril; 1990 Mar; 53(3):521-7. PubMed ID: 2307249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Spermatozoal characteristics from fresh and frozen donor semen and their correlation with fertility outcome after intrauterine insemination.
Marshburn PB; McIntire D; Carr BR; Byrd W
Fertil Steril; 1992 Jul; 58(1):179-86. PubMed ID: 1624002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intrauterine insemination with frozen sperm increases pregnancy rates in donor insemination cycles under gonadotropin stimulation.
Matorras R; Gorostiaga A; Diez J; Corcóstegui B; Pijoan JI; Ramón O; Rodriguez-Escudero FJ
Fertil Steril; 1996 Mar; 65(3):620-5. PubMed ID: 8774298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of intracervical, intrauterine, and intratubal techniques for donor insemination.
Hurd WW; Randolph JF; Ansbacher R; Menge AC; Ohl DA; Brown AN
Fertil Steril; 1993 Feb; 59(2):339-42. PubMed ID: 8425628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Donor sperm insemination cycles: are two inseminations better than one?
Chavkin DE; Molinaro TA; Roe AH; Sammel MD; Dokras A
J Androl; 2012; 33(3):375-80. PubMed ID: 21636733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of intrauterine versus intracervical insemination in fertile single women.
Carroll N; Palmer JR
Fertil Steril; 2001 Apr; 75(4):656-60. PubMed ID: 11287014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Should an intrauterine insemination with donor semen be performed 1 or 2 days after the spontaneous LH rise? A prospective RCT.
Blockeel C; Knez J; Polyzos NP; De Vos M; Camus M; Tournaye H
Hum Reprod; 2014 Apr; 29(4):697-703. PubMed ID: 24549212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intrauterine insemination outperforms intracervical insemination in a randomized, controlled study with frozen, donor semen.
Patton PE; Burry KA; Thurmond A; Novy MJ; Wolf DP
Fertil Steril; 1992 Mar; 57(3):559-64. PubMed ID: 1740198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cervical insemination versus intra-uterine insemination of donor sperm for subfertility.
Besselink DE; Farquhar C; Kremer JA; Marjoribanks J; O'Brien P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2008 Apr; (2):CD000317. PubMed ID: 18425862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intrauterine insemination with frozen donor sperm: a prospective randomized trial comparing three different sperm preparation techniques.
Byrd W; Drobnis EZ; Kutteh WH; Marshburn P; Carr BR
Fertil Steril; 1994 Oct; 62(4):850-6. PubMed ID: 7926098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Single-donor and double-donor sperm intrauterine insemination cycles: does double intrauterine insemination increase clinical pregnancy rates?
Zarek SM; Hill MJ; Richter KS; Wu M; DeCherney AH; Osheroff JE; Levens ED
Fertil Steril; 2014 Sep; 102(3):739-43. PubMed ID: 24934490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intracervical insemination versus intrauterine insemination with cryopreserved donor sperm in the natural cycle: a randomized controlled trial.
Kop PAL; van Wely M; Nap A; Soufan AT; de Melker AA; Mol BWJ; Bernardus RE; De Brucker M; Janssens PMW; Pieters JJPM; Repping S; van der Veen F; Mochtar MH
Hum Reprod; 2022 May; 37(6):1175-1182. PubMed ID: 35459949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computer-Assisted Sperm Analysis (CASA) parameters and their evolution during preparation as predictors of pregnancy in intrauterine insemination with frozen-thawed donor semen cycles.
Fréour T; Jean M; Mirallié S; Dubourdieu S; Barrière P
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 Apr; 149(2):186-9. PubMed ID: 20074847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Infectious human papillomavirus virions in semen reduce clinical pregnancy rates in women undergoing intrauterine insemination.
Depuydt CE; Donders GGG; Verstraete L; Vanden Broeck D; Beert JFA; Salembier G; Bosmans E; Ombelet W
Fertil Steril; 2019 Jun; 111(6):1135-1144. PubMed ID: 31005311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An intrauterine insemination-ready cryopreservation method compared with sperm recovery after conventional freezing and post-thaw processing.
Larson JM; McKinney KA; Mixon BA; Burry KA; Wolf DP
Fertil Steril; 1997 Jul; 68(1):143-8. PubMed ID: 9207600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of bicarbonate and HEPES-buffered media on pregnancy rates after intrauterine insemination with cryopreserved donor sperm.
Byrd W; Ackerman GE; Bradshaw KD; Maddox MA; Svendsen BA; Carr BR
Fertil Steril; 1991 Sep; 56(3):540-6. PubMed ID: 1894034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of semen quality scores to predict pregnancy rates in couples undergoing intrauterine insemination with donor sperm.
Allamaneni SS; Bandaranayake I; Agarwal A
Fertil Steril; 2004 Sep; 82(3):606-11. PubMed ID: 15374703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A short versus a long time interval between semen collection and intrauterine insemination: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Statema-Lohmeijer CH; Schats R; Lissenberg-Witte BI; Kostelijk EH; Lambalk CB; Vergouw CG
Hum Reprod; 2023 May; 38(5):811-819. PubMed ID: 36892580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
