These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

59 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11438783)

  • 1. [Mammographic screening or clinical diagnosis? Proposal of a unified model].
    Di Maggio C; Fioretti P; La Grassa M; Liberati L; Pescarini L; Gennaro G
    Radiol Med; 2001 May; 101(5):326-33. PubMed ID: 11438783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Beyond diagnostics. A commitment to saving lives.
    Osborne J
    Adm Radiol; 1990 Jun; 9(6):27-9. PubMed ID: 10105302
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Establishment of an interventional radiology clinic to follow untreated abdominal aortic aneurysms.
    Bertino R; Pai D; Beach D; Moresco K; Brady T; Smouse B; Hassan S; Shadid A; Swischuk JL
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Apr; 3(4):291-5. PubMed ID: 17412062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The business of caring. The breast imaging service as model.
    Brazel MM
    Adm Radiol; 1988 Jul; 7(7):61-2, 65-6. PubMed ID: 10288810
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Overestimated cost savings by mammographic screening].
    Andersson I
    Lakartidningen; 1996 Aug; 93(32-33):2725. PubMed ID: 8801411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [An inquiry on mammography in Sweden: uneven regional distribution--8 counties have no resources for screening].
    Lennholm B
    Lakartidningen; 1989 Oct; 86(40):3379-80, 3384. PubMed ID: 2796528
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Decentralized mammography screening gives good results].
    Heinius J; Appelgren B; Einarsson E; von Palffy Z; Järhult J
    Lakartidningen; 1989 Oct; 86(40):3377-8. PubMed ID: 2796527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Swedish mammographic screening. Annual costs 106 millions crowns, 2,7 percent of participants are further examined].
    Lundgren B
    Lakartidningen; 1996 Jan; 93(3):126. PubMed ID: 8569321
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mammographic screening: does it work?
    Handler S
    Minn Med; 2003 Dec; 86(12):6-7. PubMed ID: 14719608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Mammography screening in Germany: how, when and why?].
    Bick U
    Rofo; 2006 Oct; 178(10):957-69. PubMed ID: 17021975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Breast cancer screening lacking effectiveness].
    Giard RW; Bonneux LG
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 Nov; 145(46):2205-8. PubMed ID: 11757241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A model-based comparison of breast cancer screening strategies: mammograms and clinical breast examinations.
    Shen Y; Parmigiani G
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 Feb; 14(2):529-32. PubMed ID: 15734983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Current problems in the organization of fluorography].
    Iukelis LI
    Probl Tuberk; 1987; (11):9-12. PubMed ID: 3438289
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost-effectiveness of mammography for older women.
    Finucane TE
    Ann Intern Med; 2004 May; 140(10):844; author reply 844. PubMed ID: 15148077
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Economic evaluation of the new national breast cancer screening programme in France: application to the Bouche-du-Rhone district].
    Giorgi R; Reynaud J; Wait S; Seradour B
    Bull Cancer; 2005 Nov; 92(11):995-1001. PubMed ID: 16316834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Breast cancer screening policies in developing countries: a cost-effectiveness analysis for India.
    Okonkwo QL; Draisma G; der Kinderen A; Brown ML; de Koning HJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Sep; 100(18):1290-300. PubMed ID: 18780864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hormone replacement therapy and mammographic screening.
    Marsden J
    J Br Menopause Soc; 2004 Jun; 10(2):75, 80. PubMed ID: 15207029
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Customer satisfaction analysis in women attending an organized mammographic screening. Pilot study at Trento].
    Della Sala W; Tognotti F; Pellegrini M; Bernardi D; Gentilini M; Piffer S
    Ann Ig; 2005; 17(5):433-40. PubMed ID: 16353680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Information systems in the management of the radiology department.
    Nanni M; Carnassale R; Napoli M; Campioni P; Marano P
    Rays; 2003; 28(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 14509180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Screening for breast cancer in England: past and future.
    Advisory Committee on Breast Cancer Screening
    J Med Screen; 2006; 13(2):59-61. PubMed ID: 16792825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.