BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11439427)

  • 1. Evaluation of an adjusted chi-square statistic as applied to observational studies involving clustered binary data.
    Jung SH; Ahn C; Donner A
    Stat Med; 2001 Jul; 20(14):2149-61. PubMed ID: 11439427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Application of an adjusted chi2 statistic to site-specific data in observational dental studies.
    Ahn C; Jung SH; Donner A
    J Clin Periodontol; 2002 Jan; 29(1):79-82. PubMed ID: 11846853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Chi-square test for R x C contingency tables with clustered data.
    Jung SH; Kang SH; Ahn C
    J Biopharm Stat; 2003 May; 13(2):241-51. PubMed ID: 12729392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A simple method for the analysis of clustered binary data.
    Rao JN; Scott AJ
    Biometrics; 1992 Jun; 48(2):577-85. PubMed ID: 1637980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment on homogeneity tests for kappa statistics under equal prevalence across studies in reliability.
    Nam JM
    Stat Med; 2006 May; 25(9):1521-31. PubMed ID: 16220477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Significance testing for correlated binary outcome data.
    Rosner B; Milton RC
    Biometrics; 1988 Jun; 44(2):505-12. PubMed ID: 3390508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantile-function based null distribution in resampling based multiple testing.
    van der Laan MJ; Hubbard AE
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2006; 5():Article14. PubMed ID: 17049025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Confidence intervals for the difference of marginal probabilities in clustered matched-pair binary data.
    Yang Z; Sun X; Hardin JW
    Pharm Stat; 2012; 11(5):386-93. PubMed ID: 22684766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of statistical methods for analysis of clustered binary observations.
    Heo M; Leon AC
    Stat Med; 2005 Mar; 24(6):911-23. PubMed ID: 15558576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Methods for the statistical analysis of binary data in split-cluster designs.
    Donner A; Klar N; Zou G
    Biometrics; 2004 Dec; 60(4):919-25. PubMed ID: 15606412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Imputation strategies for missing continuous outcomes in cluster randomized trials.
    Taljaard M; Donner A; Klar N
    Biom J; 2008 Jun; 50(3):329-45. PubMed ID: 18537126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The score test for independence in R x C contingency tables with missing data.
    Lipsitz SR; Fitzmaurice GM
    Biometrics; 1996 Jun; 52(2):751-62. PubMed ID: 8672711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Goodness of fit in polytomous items: Type I error rates and empirical power for three fit-indexes].
    Sueiro MJ; Abad FJ
    Psicothema; 2009 Nov; 21(4):639-45. PubMed ID: 19861112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of confidence interval methods for the intraclass correlation coefficient in cluster randomized trials.
    Ukoumunne OC
    Stat Med; 2002 Dec; 21(24):3757-74. PubMed ID: 12483765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Meta-analysis of community-based cluster randomization trials with binary outcomes.
    Darlington GA; Donner A
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(5):491-8. PubMed ID: 17942465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Score statistic to test for genetic correlation for proband-family design.
    el Galta R; van Duijn CM; van Houwelingen JC; Houwing-Duistermaat JJ
    Ann Hum Genet; 2005 Jul; 69(Pt 4):373-81. PubMed ID: 15996166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Wilcoxon signed rank test for paired comparisons of clustered data.
    Rosner B; Glynn RJ; Lee ML
    Biometrics; 2006 Mar; 62(1):185-92. PubMed ID: 16542245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sample size and power for McNemar's test with clustered data.
    Gönen M
    Stat Med; 2004 Jul; 23(14):2283-94. PubMed ID: 15236431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Power of tests for comparing trend curves with application to national immunization survey (NIS).
    Zhao Z
    Stat Med; 2011 Feb; 30(5):531-40. PubMed ID: 21287587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A nonparametric smoothing method for assessing GEE models with longitudinal binary data.
    Lin KC; Chen YJ; Shyr Y
    Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(22):4428-39. PubMed ID: 18613210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.