165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11439491)
1. A measured data set for evaluating electron-beam dose algorithms.
Boyd RA; Hogstrom KR; Antolak JA; Shiu AS
Med Phys; 2001 Jun; 28(6):950-8. PubMed ID: 11439491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Monte Carlo calculation of output factors for circular, rectangular, and square fields of electron accelerators (6-20 MeV).
Verhaegen F; Mubata C; Pettingell J; Bidmead AM; Rosenberg I; Mockridge D; Nahum AE
Med Phys; 2001 Jun; 28(6):938-49. PubMed ID: 11439490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Monte carlo electron source model validation for an Elekta Precise linac.
Ali OA; Willemse CA; Shaw W; O'Reilly FH; du Plessis FC
Med Phys; 2011 May; 38(5):2366-73. PubMed ID: 21776771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Experimental verification and clinical implementation of a commercial Monte Carlo electron beam dose calculation algorithm.
Fragoso M; Pillai S; Solberg TD; Chetty IJ
Med Phys; 2008 Mar; 35(3):1028-38. PubMed ID: 18404938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Modeling skin collimation using the electron pencil beam redefinition algorithm.
Chi PC; Hogstrom KR; Starkschall G; Antolak JA; Boyd RA
Med Phys; 2005 Nov; 32(11):3409-18. PubMed ID: 16370427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Using Monte Carlo methods to commission electron beams: a feasibility study.
Antolak JA; Bieda MR; Hogstrom KR
Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):771-86. PubMed ID: 12033573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Electron beam modeling and commissioning for Monte Carlo treatment planning.
Jiang SB; Kapur A; Ma CM
Med Phys; 2000 Jan; 27(1):180-91. PubMed ID: 10659756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the first commercial Monte Carlo dose calculation engine for electron beam treatment planning.
Cygler JE; Daskalov GM; Chan GH; Ding GX
Med Phys; 2004 Jan; 31(1):142-53. PubMed ID: 14761030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance of two commercial electron beam algorithms over regions close to the lung-mediastinum interface, against Monte Carlo simulation and point dosimetry in virtual and anthropomorphic phantoms.
Ojala J; Hyödynmaa S; Barańczyk R; Góra E; Waligórski MP
Phys Med; 2014 Mar; 30(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 23702438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Electron pencil-beam redefinition algorithm dose calculations in the presence of heterogeneities.
Boyd RA; Hogstrom KR; Starkschall G
Med Phys; 2001 Oct; 28(10):2096-104. PubMed ID: 11695771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Magnetic confinement of electron and photon radiotherapy dose: a Monte Carlo simulation with a nonuniform longitudinal magnetic field.
Chen Y; Bielajew AF; Litzenberg DW; Moran JM; Becchetti FD
Med Phys; 2005 Dec; 32(12):3810-8. PubMed ID: 16475781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Monte Carlo dose calculations in homogeneous media and at interfaces: a comparison between GEPTS, EGSnrc, MCNP, and measurements.
Chibani O; Li XA
Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):835-47. PubMed ID: 12033580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Benchmarking analytical calculations of proton doses in heterogeneous matter.
Ciangaru G; Polf JC; Bues M; Smith AR
Med Phys; 2005 Dec; 32(12):3511-23. PubMed ID: 16475750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accurate characterization of Monte Carlo calculated electron beams for radiotherapy.
Ma CM; Faddegon BA; Rogers DW; Mackie TR
Med Phys; 1997 Mar; 24(3):401-16. PubMed ID: 9089592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Superposition dose calculation incorporating Monte Carlo generated electron track kernels.
Keall PJ; Hoban PW
Med Phys; 1996 Apr; 23(4):479-85. PubMed ID: 9157258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Measurements of electron beam peak scatter factors.
Ding GX; Cygler JE
Med Phys; 1998 Feb; 25(2):251-3. PubMed ID: 9507489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Monte Carlo based beam model using a photon MLC for modulated electron radiotherapy.
Henzen D; Manser P; Frei D; Volken W; Neuenschwander H; Born EJ; Vetterli D; Chatelain C; Stampanoni MF; Fix MK
Med Phys; 2014 Feb; 41(2):021714. PubMed ID: 24506605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of electron beam dose calculation accuracy between treatment planning systems using either a pencil beam or a Monte Carlo algorithm.
Ding GX; Cygler JE; Yu CW; Kalach NI; Daskalov G
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):622-33. PubMed ID: 16168854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The use of an extra-focal electron source to model collimator-scattered electrons using the pencil-beam redefinition algorithm.
Boyd RA; Hogstrom KR; White RA; Antolak JA
Med Phys; 2002 Nov; 29(11):2571-83. PubMed ID: 12462724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mean energy, energy-range relationships and depth-scaling factors for clinical electron beams.
Ding GX; Rogers DW
Med Phys; 1996 Mar; 23(3):361-76. PubMed ID: 8815379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
