These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11440312)

  • 21. Digital signal processing hearing aids, personal FM systems, and interference: is there a problem?
    Bamford J; Hostler M; Pont G
    Ear Hear; 2005 Jun; 26(3):341-9. PubMed ID: 15937414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Electromagnetic interference of analog cellular telephones with pacemakers.
    Barbaro V; Bartolini P; Donato A; Militello C
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Oct; 19(10):1410-8. PubMed ID: 8904531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Efficacy of hearing-aid based telephone strategies for listeners with moderate-to-severe hearing loss.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jan; 24(1):59-70. PubMed ID: 23231817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Perceptual effects of noise reduction with respect to personal preference, speech intelligibility, and listening effort.
    Brons I; Houben R; Dreschler WA
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 22874643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of two digital hearing aids.
    Knebel SB; Bentler RA
    Ear Hear; 1998 Aug; 19(4):280-9. PubMed ID: 9728723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Hearing aid users benefit from induction loop when using digital cellular phones.
    Sorri M; Piiparinen P; Huttunen K; Haho M; Tobey E; Thibodeau L; Buckley K
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):119-32. PubMed ID: 12677109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of the electroacoustic characteristics of five hearing aids.
    Moore BC; Stone MA; Alcántara JI
    Br J Audiol; 2001 Oct; 35(5):307-25. PubMed ID: 11824533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Digital cellular telephone interaction with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.
    Fetter JG; Ivans V; Benditt DG; Collins J
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1998 Mar; 31(3):623-8. PubMed ID: 9502645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of release time on preferred gain and speech acoustics.
    Muller TF; Harris FP; Ellison JC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2004 Oct; 15(9):605-15. PubMed ID: 15575335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Amplification with digital noise reduction and the perception of annoying and aversive sounds.
    Palmer CV; Bentler R; Mueller HG
    Trends Amplif; 2006 Jun; 10(2):95-104. PubMed ID: 16959733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Probe microphone measurements: 20 years of progress.
    Mueller HG
    Trends Amplif; 2001 Jun; 5(2):35-68. PubMed ID: 25425897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Electromagnetic interference of digital and analog cellular telephones with implantable cardioverter defibrillators: in vitro and in vivo studies.
    Barbaro V; Bartolini P; Bellocci F; Caruso F; Donato A; Gabrielli D; Militello C; Montenero AS; Zecchi P
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Apr; 22(4 Pt 1):626-34. PubMed ID: 10234716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cellular phone interference with external cardiopulmonary monitoring devices.
    Tri JL; Hayes DL; Smith TT; Severson RP
    Mayo Clin Proc; 2001 Jan; 76(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 11155403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of performance across three directional hearing aids.
    Ricketts T; Dhar S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1999 Apr; 10(4):180-9. PubMed ID: 10941709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. In-vivo testing of digital cellular telephones in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.
    Chiladakis JA; Davlouros P; Agelopoulos G; Manolis AS
    Eur Heart J; 2001 Aug; 22(15):1337-42. PubMed ID: 11465966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparing loudness normalization (IHAFF) with speech intelligibility maximization (NAL-NL1) when implemented in a two-channel device.
    Keidser G; Grant F
    Ear Hear; 2001 Dec; 22(6):501-15. PubMed ID: 11770672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Feedback path variability modeling for robust hearing aids.
    Rafaely B; Roccasalva-Firenze M; Payne E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 May; 107(5 Pt 1):2665-73. PubMed ID: 10830388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cellular telephone interference with medical equipment.
    Tri JL; Severson RP; Firl AR; Hayes DL; Abenstein JP
    Mayo Clin Proc; 2005 Oct; 80(10):1286-90. PubMed ID: 16212140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Binaurality in middle ear implant recipients using contralateral digital hearing AIDS.
    Saliba I; Calmels MN; Wanna G; Iversenc G; James C; Deguine O; Fraysse B
    Otol Neurotol; 2005 Jul; 26(4):680-5. PubMed ID: 16015168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.