109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11441302)
1. [Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: costs and efficiency].
Golder WA
Onkologie; 2001 Apr; 24(2):185-8. PubMed ID: 11441302
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Analysis of Cost-effectiveness of screening for breast cancer with conventional mammography, digital and magnetic resonance imaging].
Peregrino AA; Vianna CM; de Almeida CE; Gonzáles GB; Machado SC; Costa e Silva FV; Rodrigues MP
Cien Saude Colet; 2012 Jan; 17(1):215-22. PubMed ID: 22218554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effectiveness of mammography, MRI, and ultrasonography for breast cancer screening.
Feig S
Radiol Clin North Am; 2010 Sep; 48(5):879-91. PubMed ID: 20868891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effectiveness of screening women with familial risk for breast cancer with magnetic resonance imaging.
Saadatmand S; Tilanus-Linthorst MM; Rutgers EJ; Hoogerbrugge N; Oosterwijk JC; Tollenaar RA; Hooning M; Loo CE; Obdeijn IM; Heijnsdijk EA; de Koning HJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Sep; 105(17):1314-21. PubMed ID: 23940285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Economic aspects of MR-mammography in dense breasts.
Kaiser CG; Reich C; Wasser K; Schönberg SO; Kaiser WA
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S69-71. PubMed ID: 23083609
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness of screening BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with breast magnetic resonance imaging.
Plevritis SK; Kurian AW; Sigal BM; Daniel BL; Ikeda DM; Stockdale FE; Garber AM
JAMA; 2006 May; 295(20):2374-84. PubMed ID: 16720823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mammography and beyond: building better breast cancer screening tests.
Wang L
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2003 Mar; 95(5):344-6. PubMed ID: 12618493
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Mammography screening in Germany: how, when and why?].
Bick U
Rofo; 2006 Oct; 178(10):957-69. PubMed ID: 17021975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost evaluation of breast cancer screening in France.
Lamarque JL; Pujol J; Cherifcheikh J; Laurent JC; Taourel P; Boulet P; Daurès JP; Séguret F; Guizard AV; Delande G; Negre M
Acad Radiol; 1998 Sep; 5 Suppl 2():S336-9. PubMed ID: 9750847
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of costs and benefits of breast cancer screening with mammography, ultrasonography, and MRI.
Feig S
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2011 Mar; 38(1):179-96, ix. PubMed ID: 21419333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Mammography screening. Senselessly squandered money?].
Rautenstrauch J
MMW Fortschr Med; 2000 Mar; 142(12):4-8. PubMed ID: 10804710
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. What are the benefits and costs of screening mammograms on Kentucky women aged 40-49?
Spratt JS; Gaines BM; Aaron WS; Cerrito P
J Surg Oncol; 1996 Oct; 63(2):71-6. PubMed ID: 8888797
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Cost-effectiveness analysis of breast cancer screening with mammography].
Iinuma T
Nihon Rinsho; 2007 Jun; 65 Suppl 6():226-8. PubMed ID: 17682158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Offering mammography is beneficial in the long run].
Cederblom S
Lakartidningen; 1995 Dec; 92(51-52):4865-8. PubMed ID: 8544497
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The use of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer screening.
Lee CH; Weinreb JC
J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Mar; 1(3):176-82. PubMed ID: 17411555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of screening programme on mortality from breast cancer. Investment in treatment would be more cost effective.
Baum M; Tobias JS
BMJ; 2000 Dec; 321(7275):1528. PubMed ID: 11118189
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Setting calculations aside.
Meyer CR
Minn Med; 2003 Dec; 86(12):2. PubMed ID: 14719607
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-effectiveness analysis of mammography screening in Hong Kong Chinese using state-transition Markov modelling.
Wong IO; Kuntz KM; Cowling BJ; Lam CL; Leung GM
Hong Kong Med J; 2010 Jun; 16 Suppl 3():38-41. PubMed ID: 20601733
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Induced costs of low-cost screening mammography.
Cyrlak D
Radiology; 1988 Sep; 168(3):661-3. PubMed ID: 3406395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Potential Cost Savings of Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography.
Patel BK; Gray RJ; Pockaj BA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jun; 208(6):W231-W237. PubMed ID: 28379734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
