These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11442114)

  • 1. Calibration of medium-resolution monochrome cathode ray tube displays for the purpose of board examinations.
    Evanoff MG; Roehrig H; Giffords RS; Capp MP; Rovinelli RJ; Hartmann WH; Merritt C
    J Digit Imaging; 2001 Jun; 14(2 Suppl 1):27-33. PubMed ID: 11442114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Variations in performance of LCDs are still evident after DICOM gray-scale standard display calibration.
    Lowe JM; Brennan PC; Evanoff MG; McEntee MF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jul; 195(1):181-7. PubMed ID: 20566814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. SoftCopy Display Quality Assurance Program at Texas Children's Hospital.
    Ly CK
    J Digit Imaging; 2002; 15 Suppl 1():33-40. PubMed ID: 12105695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quality-control issues on high-resolution diagnostic monitors.
    Parr LF; Anderson AL; Glennon BK; Fetherston P
    J Digit Imaging; 2001 Jun; 14(2 Suppl 1):22-6. PubMed ID: 11442103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implementing the DICOM Grayscale Standard Display Function for mixed hard- and soft-copy operations.
    Thompson SK; Willis CE; Krugh KT; Jeff Shepard S; McEnery KW
    J Digit Imaging; 2002; 15 Suppl 1():27-32. PubMed ID: 12105694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of grey-scale standard display function as a calibration tool for diagnostic liquid crystal display monitors using psychophysical analysis.
    Asai Y; Shintani Y; Yamaguchi M; Uemura M; Matsumoto M; Kanamori H
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2005 May; 43(3):319-24. PubMed ID: 16035218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Characterization of monochrome CRT display systems in the field.
    Roehrig H; Willis CE; Damento MA
    J Digit Imaging; 1999 Nov; 12(4):152-65. PubMed ID: 10587910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is the iPad suitable for image display at American Board of Radiology examinations?
    Toomey RJ; Rainford LA; Leong DL; Butler ML; Evanoff MG; Kavanagh EC; Ryan JT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Nov; 203(5):1028-33. PubMed ID: 25341141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cathode ray tube quality control and acceptance testing program: initial results for clinical PACS displays.
    Groth DS; Bernatz SN; Fetterly KA; Hangiandreou NJ
    Radiographics; 2001; 21(3):719-32. PubMed ID: 11353118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characterization of color CRT display systems for monochrome applications.
    Spekowius G
    J Digit Imaging; 1999 Aug; 12(3):102-13. PubMed ID: 10461573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimization of reading conditions for flat panel displays.
    Thomas JA; Chakrabarti K; Kaczmarek RV; Maslennikov A; Mitchell CA; Romanyukha A
    J Digit Imaging; 2006 Jun; 19(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 16437286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Practical assessment of the display performance of radiology workstations.
    Thompson DP; Koller CJ; Eatough JP
    Br J Radiol; 2007 Apr; 80(952):256-60. PubMed ID: 17038407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance tests and quality control of cathode ray tube displays.
    Roehrig H; Blume H; Ji TL; Browne M
    J Digit Imaging; 1990 Aug; 3(3):134-45. PubMed ID: 2085547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of a cathode-ray-tube and film for display of computed radiographic images.
    Cook LT; Cox GG; Insana MF; McFadden MA; Hall TJ; Gaborski RS; Lure FY
    Med Phys; 1998 Jul; 25(7 Pt 1):1132-8. PubMed ID: 9682198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality of 'commercial-off-the-shelf' (COTS) monitors displaying dental radiographs.
    McIlgorm DJ; Lawinski C; Ng S; McNulty JP
    Br Dent J; 2013 Dec; 215(11):E22. PubMed ID: 24309815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Angular dependence of the luminance and contrast in medical monochrome liquid crystal displays.
    Badano A; Flynn MJ; Martin S; Kanicki J
    Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2602-13. PubMed ID: 14596296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Image quality assurance of soft copy display systems.
    Seto E; Ursani A; Cafazzo JA; Rossos PG; Easty AC
    J Digit Imaging; 2005 Dec; 18(4):280-6. PubMed ID: 15988625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of PACS display systems.
    Aldrich JE; Rutledge JD
    J Digit Imaging; 2005 Dec; 18(4):287-95. PubMed ID: 16094505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of display performance for medical imaging systems: executive summary of AAPM TG18 report.
    Samei E; Badano A; Chakraborty D; Compton K; Cornelius C; Corrigan K; Flynn MJ; Hemminger B; Hangiandreou N; Johnson J; Moxley-Stevens DM; Pavlicek W; Roehrig H; Rutz L; Shepard J; Uzenoff RA; Wang J; Willis CE;
    Med Phys; 2005 Apr; 32(4):1205-25. PubMed ID: 15895604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Active matrix liquid crystal displays for clinical imaging: comparison with cathode ray tube displays.
    Pavlicek W; Owen JM; Peter MB
    J Digit Imaging; 2000 May; 13(2 Suppl 1):155-61. PubMed ID: 10847388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.