These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11442119)

  • 1. A comparison of image characteristics and convenience in panoramic radiography using charge-coupled device, storage phosphor, and film receptors.
    Farman AG; Farman TT
    J Digit Imaging; 2001 Jun; 14(2 Suppl 1):48-51. PubMed ID: 11442119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Temporomandibular joint pantomography using charge-coupled device, photostimulable phosphor, and film receptors: a comparison.
    Farman TT; Farman AG
    J Digit Imaging; 1999 May; 12(2 Suppl 1):9-13. PubMed ID: 10342155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The OP 100 Digipan: evaluation of the image layer, magnification factors, and dosimetry.
    Farman TT; Kelly MS; Farman AG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Feb; 83(2):281-7. PubMed ID: 9117762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the dynamic range of different X-ray photon detectors in intra-oral radiography. A comparison of image quality in film, charge-coupled device and storage phosphor systems.
    Borg E; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Apr; 25(2):82-8. PubMed ID: 9446978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Charge-coupled device panoramic radiography: effect of beam energy on radiation exposure.
    Farman TT; Farman AG; Kelly MS; Firriolo FJ; Yancey JM; Stewart AV
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Jan; 27(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 9482021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Panoramic dental radiography using a charge-coupled device receptor.
    Farman AG; Farman TT
    J Digit Imaging; 1998 Aug; 11(3 Suppl 1):166-8. PubMed ID: 9735460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The reduction of dose in paediatric panoramic radiography: the impact of collimator height and programme selection.
    Davis AT; Safi H; Maddison SM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(2):20140223. PubMed ID: 25352427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of panoramic image quality between a digital radiography storage phosphor system and a film-based system.
    Parissis N; Angelopoulos C; Mantegari S; Karamanis S; Masood F; Tsirlis A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Jan; 11(1):E009-16. PubMed ID: 20098961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dosimetry of digital panoramic imaging. Part I: Patient exposure.
    Gijbels F; Jacobs R; Bogaerts R; Debaveye D; Verlinden S; Sanderink G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):145-9. PubMed ID: 15897284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intraoral radiology in general dental practices - a comparison of digital and film-based X-ray systems with regard to radiation protection and dose reduction.
    Anissi HD; Geibel MA
    Rofo; 2014 Aug; 186(8):762-7. PubMed ID: 24648236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dosimetry of digital panoramic imaging. Part II: Occupational exposure.
    Gijbels F; Jacobs R; Debaveye D; Bogaerts R; Verlinden S; Sanderink G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):150-3. PubMed ID: 15897285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. GafChromic XR-QA film in testing panoramic dental radiography.
    Chu RY; Lam T; Liang Y
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2007 Apr; 8(2):110-3. PubMed ID: 17592467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Paediatric absorbed doses from rotational panoramic radiography.
    Hayakawa Y; Kobayashi N; Kuroyanagi K; Nishizawa K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Sep; 30(5):285-92. PubMed ID: 11571549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of spatial resolution between tomographic images and ghosts in rotational panoramic radiography: the effect of the first slit width.
    Wakoh M; Yamamoto K; Fujimori H; Kuroyanagi K
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1992 Nov; 33(4):197-203. PubMed ID: 1303325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. RVG-ui: a sensor to rival direct-exposure intra-oral x-ray film.
    Farman AG; Farman TT
    Int J Comput Dent; 1999 Jul; 2(3):183-96. PubMed ID: 11351483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical and in vitro film quality comparison of manual and automatic exposure control in panoramic radiography.
    Eraso FE; Ludlow JB; Platin E; Tyndall D; Phillips C
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Apr; 87(4):518-23. PubMed ID: 10225638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of the diagnostic utility of two image receptors for panoramic radiography.
    Carmichael FA; Hirschmann PN; Scaife B; Sheard L; Mackenzie A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 10654038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Digital panoramic and extraoral imaging.
    Dove SB; McDavid WD
    Dent Clin North Am; 1993 Oct; 37(4):541-51. PubMed ID: 8224331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Determination of the resolution of a digital system for panoramic radiography based on CCD technology.
    Mastoris M; Li G; Welander U; McDavid WD
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2004 Mar; 97(3):408-14. PubMed ID: 15024369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Techniques for measurement of dose width product in panoramic dental radiography.
    Doyle P; Martin CJ; Robertson J
    Br J Radiol; 2006 Feb; 79(938):142-7. PubMed ID: 16489195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.