125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11442122)
1. A use of a neural network to evaluate contrast enhancement curves in breast magnetic resonance images.
Vergnaghi D; Monti A; Setti E; Musumeci R
J Digit Imaging; 2001 Jun; 14(2 Suppl 1):58-9. PubMed ID: 11442122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automatic identification and classification of characteristic kinetic curves of breast lesions on DCE-MRI.
Chen W; Giger ML; Bick U; Newstead GM
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2878-87. PubMed ID: 16964864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Neural network approach to the segmentation and classification of dynamic magnetic resonance images of the breast: comparison with empiric and quantitative kinetic parameters.
Szabó BK; Aspelin P; Wiberg MK
Acad Radiol; 2004 Dec; 11(12):1344-54. PubMed ID: 15596372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Breast magnetic resonance imaging: a computer-based analysis of enhancement curves.
Setti E; Trecate G; Ferrari M; Mainardi L; Musumeci R
J Digit Imaging; 2001 Jun; 14(2 Suppl 1):226-8. PubMed ID: 11442107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Artificial Neural Networks for differential diagnosis of breast lesions in MR-Mammography: a systematic approach addressing the influence of network architecture on diagnostic performance using a large clinical database.
Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Dietzel A; Zoubi R; Gröschel T; Burmeister HP; Bogdan M; Kaiser WA
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1508-13. PubMed ID: 21459533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Breast disease: dynamic spiral MR imaging.
Daniel BL; Yen YF; Glover GH; Ikeda DM; Birdwell RL; Sawyer-Glover AM; Black JW; Plevritis SK; Jeffrey SS; Herfkens RJ
Radiology; 1998 Nov; 209(2):499-509. PubMed ID: 9807580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Primary breast abnormalities: selective pixel sampling on dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR images.
Mussurakis S; Gibbs P; Horsman A
Radiology; 1998 Feb; 206(2):465-73. PubMed ID: 9457201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Classification of signal-time curves obtained by dynamic magnetic resonance mammography: statistical comparison of quantitative methods.
Lucht RE; Delorme S; Hei J; Knopp MV; Weber MA; Griebel J; Brix G
Invest Radiol; 2005 Jul; 40(7):442-7. PubMed ID: 15973136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The diagnostic sensitivity of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and breast-specific gamma imaging in women with calcified and non-calcified DCIS.
Kim JS; Lee SM; Cha ES
Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):668-75. PubMed ID: 24043881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can breast MRI computer-aided detection (CAD) improve radiologist accuracy for lesions detected at MRI screening and recommended for biopsy in a high-risk population?
Arazi-Kleinman T; Causer PA; Jong RA; Hill K; Warner E
Clin Radiol; 2009 Dec; 64(12):1166-74. PubMed ID: 19913125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pharmacokinetic approach for dynamic breast MRI to indicate signal intensity time curves of benign and malignant lesions by using the tumor flow residence time.
Renz DM; Diekmann F; Schmitzberger FF; Pietsch H; Fallenberg EM; Durmus T; Huppertz A; Böttcher J; Bick U; Hamm B; Lawaczeck R
Invest Radiol; 2013 Feb; 48(2):69-78. PubMed ID: 23262793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Neural network-based segmentation of dynamic MR mammographic images.
Lucht R; Delorme S; Brix G
Magn Reson Imaging; 2002 Feb; 20(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 12034335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Application of artificial neural networks to the analysis of dynamic MR imaging features of the breast.
Szabó BK; Wiberg MK; Boné B; Aspelin P
Eur Radiol; 2004 Jul; 14(7):1217-25. PubMed ID: 15034745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the three-time-point method for diagnosis of breast lesions in contrast-enhanced MR mammography.
Hauth EA; Stockamp C; Maderwald S; Mühler A; Kimmig R; Jaeger H; Barkhausen J; Forsting M
Clin Imaging; 2006; 30(3):160-5. PubMed ID: 16632149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ductal carcinoma in situ: is there a role for MRI?
Zuiani C; Francescutti GE; Londero V; Zunnui I; Bazzocchi M
J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2002 Sep; 21(3 Suppl):89-95. PubMed ID: 12585661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improved artificial neural networks in prediction of malignancy of lesions in contrast-enhanced MR-mammography.
Vomweg TW; Buscema M; Kauczor HU; Teifke A; Intraligi M; Terzi S; Heussel CP; Achenbach T; Rieker O; Mayer D; Thelen M
Med Phys; 2003 Sep; 30(9):2350-9. PubMed ID: 14528957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Breast lesion detection and characterization at contrast-enhanced MR mammography: gadobenate dimeglumine versus gadopentetate dimeglumine.
Pediconi F; Catalano C; Occhiato R; Venditti F; Fraioli F; Napoli A; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
Radiology; 2005 Oct; 237(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 16126926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Morphology and contrast enhancement of ductal carcinoma in situ in dynamic 1.0 T MR mammography].
Sittek H; Kessler M; Heuck AF; Bredl T; Perlet C; Künzer I; Lebeau A; Untch M; Reiser M
Rofo; 1997 Sep; 167(3):247-51. PubMed ID: 9376552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Peripheral washout sign on contrast-enhanced MR images of the breast.
Sherif H; Mahfouz AE; Oellinger H; Hadijuana J; Blohmer JU; Taupitz M; Felix R; Hamm B
Radiology; 1997 Oct; 205(1):209-13. PubMed ID: 9314987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A mathematical theory of shape and neuro-fuzzy methodology-based diagnostic analysis: a comparative study on early detection and treatment planning of brain cancer.
Kar S; Majumder DD
Int J Clin Oncol; 2017 Aug; 22(4):667-681. PubMed ID: 28321787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
