382 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11442184)
1. Central corneal thickness, tonometry, and ocular dimensions in glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
Singh RP; Goldberg I; Graham SL; Sharma A; Mohsin M
J Glaucoma; 2001 Jun; 10(3):206-10. PubMed ID: 11442184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Correlation between intraocular pressure, central corneal thickness, stage of glaucoma, and demographic patient data: prospective analysis of biophysical parameters in tertiary glaucoma practice populations.
Kniestedt C; Lin S; Choe J; Nee M; Bostrom A; Stürmer J; Stamper RL
J Glaucoma; 2006 Apr; 15(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 16633220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of factors affecting the difference in intraocular pressure measurements between dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry.
Wang J; Cayer MM; Descovich D; Kamdeu-Fansi A; Harasymowycz PJ; Li G; Lesk MR
J Glaucoma; 2011 Oct; 20(8):482-7. PubMed ID: 21048515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Correlation between Central Corneal Thickness and Intraocular Pressure Measured by Goldmann Applanation Tonometry or Pascal Dynamic Contour Tonometry.
Katsimpris JM; Theoulakis PE; Vasilopoulos K; Skourtis G; Papadopoulos GE; Petropoulos IK
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2015 Apr; 232(4):414-8. PubMed ID: 25902089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative results of central corneal thickness measurements in primary open-angle glaucoma, pseudoexfoliation glaucoma, and ocular hypertension.
Gorezis S; Christos G; Stefaniotou M; Moustaklis K; Skyrlas A; Kitsos G
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2008; 39(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 18254346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. ICare Pro: Age Dependent Effect of Central Corneal Thickness on Intraocular Pressure in Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension Patients.
Hohberger B; Sommerfeld C; Lucio M; Bergua A
Curr Eye Res; 2020 Jun; 45(6):668-674. PubMed ID: 31905299
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis treatment.
Duch S; Serra A; Castanera J; Abos R; Quintana M
J Glaucoma; 2001 Aug; 10(4):261-5. PubMed ID: 11558808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry: Difference of Intraocular Pressure Values Between Eyes with and without Glaucomatous Damage in Thin Corneas].
Umurhan Akkan JC; Akkan F; Sezgin Akcay BI; Ayintap E; Tuncer K
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2015 Oct; 232(10):1190-7. PubMed ID: 26512850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correlation between diurnal variation of intraocular pressure, ocular pulse amplitude and corneal structural properties.
Villas-Bôas FS; Doi LM; Sousa AK; Melo LA
Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2009; 72(3):296-301. PubMed ID: 19668956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Distribution of central corneal thickness and its association with intraocular pressure: The Rotterdam Study.
Wolfs RC; Klaver CC; Vingerling JR; Grobbee DE; Hofman A; de Jong PT
Am J Ophthalmol; 1997 Jun; 123(6):767-72. PubMed ID: 9535620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relationship between corneal biomechanical properties, central corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure across the spectrum of glaucoma.
Kaushik S; Pandav SS; Banger A; Aggarwal K; Gupta A
Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 May; 153(5):840-849.e2. PubMed ID: 22310080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical comparison of contour and applanation tonometry and their relationship to pachymetry.
Kniestedt C; Lin S; Choe J; Bostrom A; Nee M; Stamper RL
Arch Ophthalmol; 2005 Nov; 123(11):1532-7. PubMed ID: 16286615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Clinical evaluation of the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer].
Detry-Morel M; Jamart J; Detry MB; Ledoux A; Pourjavan S
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2007 Mar; 30(3):260-70. PubMed ID: 17417152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Re: Central corneal thickness, tonometry, and ocular dimensions in glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
Stodtmeister R
J Glaucoma; 2002 Aug; 11(4):371-2; author reply 372. PubMed ID: 12169977
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Central corneal thickness and its association with ocular and general parameters in Indians: the Central India Eye and Medical Study.
Nangia V; Jonas JB; Sinha A; Matin A; Kulkarni M
Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):705-10. PubMed ID: 20045561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Evaluation of the Ocular Response Analyzer in ocular hypertension, glaucoma, and normal populations. Prospective study on 329 eyes].
Streho M; Dariel R; Giraud JM; Verret C; Fenolland JR; Crochelet O; May F; Maurin JF; Renard JP
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2008 Dec; 31(10):953-60. PubMed ID: 19107070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Primary open angle glaucoma in cornea plana masked by false normal applanation tonometry (Goldman) - a case report].
Hafner A; Seitz B
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2001 Sep; 218(9):621-5. PubMed ID: 11590471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Central corneal thickness measurements in patients with normal tension glaucoma, primary open angle glaucoma, pseudoexfoliation glaucoma, or ocular hypertension.
Ventura AC; Böhnke M; Mojon DS
Br J Ophthalmol; 2001 Jul; 85(7):792-5. PubMed ID: 11423450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ocular response analyser to assess hysteresis and corneal resistance factor in low tension, open angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
Shah S; Laiquzzaman M; Mantry S; Cunliffe I
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2008 Aug; 36(6):508-13. PubMed ID: 18954311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The relationship between central corneal thickness and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
Lleó A; Marcos A; Calatayud M; Alonso L; Rahhal SM; Sanchis-Gimeno JA
Clin Exp Optom; 2003 Mar; 86(2):104-8. PubMed ID: 12643806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
